| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, me <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Chrome's set of extensions is growing rather large, and at least |
| 3 |
> contains most of what anyone would need, a bit short of 'want', but |
| 4 |
> covers needs fairly well. If you don't like chrome's interface I'll |
| 5 |
> not argue, but if the extensions are the one thing stopping you from |
| 6 |
> giving it a real try... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Not quite NoScript, but aims to do the job: |
| 9 |
> https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn?hl=en |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Flashblock: |
| 12 |
> https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoiabjplobcaignabnl?hl=en |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Adblock: |
| 15 |
> https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom?hl=en |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> The biggest reason I've taken to using chrome, though, is that it |
| 18 |
> seems (purely subjective) to render pages far faster than anything |
| 19 |
> else I've used, though I've not run opera or safari in a very long |
| 20 |
> time. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
thx 4 sharing |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
@ghosTM55 |
| 26 |
Mechanism, not policy |
Archives