| 1 |
Shaochun Wang schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote: |
| 3 |
>> As fas as I understand it, this messages means, that the start of |
| 4 |
>> net.eth0 is backgrounding, because it can take some ticks. The next |
| 5 |
>> init-prozess is starting immediately afterward, before net.eth0 is up. |
| 6 |
>> If a init-process is started, before net.eth0 is up (in your case sshd), |
| 7 |
>> than it will go in the background, too, and waits, until net.eth0 is up |
| 8 |
>> and then it will start. Going in the background and waiting generates |
| 9 |
>> the "schedule" message. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Since I put this stuff together on my own, I do not know, if it is |
| 12 |
>> correct. Can anyone confirm this? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Cheers |
| 15 |
>> Marc |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> -- |
| 18 |
>> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 19 |
> I think you are right, but how to disable the anonying message? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Hmm, i do not think, that this should be disabled. It tells you: "Well, |
| 23 |
I started sshd, but it will only run, when net.eth0 comes up!" So if |
| 24 |
sshd does not start, you know there is a problem with net.eth0 and not |
| 25 |
sshd. Or so I hope... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
At first I was irritated, too, but now I just do not care. For me, this |
| 28 |
message is as good as "service foo has been started..." |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Cheers |
| 31 |
Marc |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives