| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Alan Mackenzie |
| 2 |
did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi, Gentoo. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days, |
| 7 |
> unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs |
| 8 |
> developer; the number of emails on both lists combined is just more than |
| 9 |
> I can handle comfortably. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I've counted 28 questions I've asked since late 2009, and every single |
| 12 |
> one of them bar two got good answers too. One of those two I answered |
| 13 |
> myself just after posting the email ;-), and the other is currently a |
| 14 |
> bug report. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'd like to say THANK YOU to everybody who helped me get a well running |
| 17 |
> Gentoo system and patiently taught me about it, but in particular to |
| 18 |
> Alan McKinnon because he's got such a splendid name. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Aw shucks, now you made me blush :-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I know what you mean about the quality of user around here - no other list I'm |
| 23 |
on anywhere else comes close. I know I whinge a lot about the many wonderful |
| 24 |
ways Gentoo can break, but I keep coming back. Part of it is the ease of |
| 25 |
changing things around and trying new versions, but mostly it's because of the |
| 26 |
folks here. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives