| 1 |
>> > 4. Should I be comfortable running the entire sync operation every |
| 2 |
>> > night, or am I jeopardizing the longevity of my HDs? |
| 3 |
>> > |
| 4 |
>> This is a joke. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I should apologize and explain this better. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> If you bought a fancy expensive hard drive then it's probably designed |
| 9 |
> for extremely heavy use and comes with nice coverage by the guy that |
| 10 |
> sold it to you. But since you ask this question I'll assume that it's |
| 11 |
> not the case. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ok so you bought a relatively cheap heard drive. But the question seems |
| 14 |
> irrelevant. Because these are cheap, mass-produced hard drives you |
| 15 |
> could do absolutely nothing with them and they could still die tomorrow. |
| 16 |
> That's the price you pay for cheaper drives. Cheap hard drives are like |
| 17 |
> life. Life is cheap. You could take all kinds of precautions and still |
| 18 |
> die tomorrow. But your drive is cheap and easily replaced (esp. if it's |
| 19 |
> still under warranty). Your data on the other hand is not. I'd rather |
| 20 |
> have a dead drive with the data backed up than a dead drive with no |
| 21 |
> backup. Drives are so cheap nowadays it's a non-issue. I'm actually |
| 22 |
> hoping my 2-year old drive dies soon because it will give me an excuse |
| 23 |
> to go out and buy a *bigger* one for the same price. But I feel |
| 24 |
> comfortable with that because I keep backups. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thank you for the clarification. Which are the "fancy expensive" hard drives? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- Grant |
Archives