| 1 |
On Sunday 27 June 2010 12:15:50 Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> is there yet a way to get the portage tree directly via git ? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> IMHO this should be more traffic efficient than rsync in the |
| 6 |
> long run (especially when syncing often). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I sometimes wonder whether I should file a feature request on rsync, to |
| 9 |
make it offer a mode in which only directories in which it does something |
| 10 |
are listed on stdout. I shudder to think of the CPU cycles that are |
| 11 |
wasted daily on scrolling all those directory names up the screen during |
| 12 |
an emerge --sync. 21293 of them on this box today, altogether. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rgds |
| 16 |
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23. |
Archives