Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:00:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJnEOsjdaaqnaYx6ySb1HpNkfyPTGUHzsMkBHkewFqqrgfb78Q@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag? by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | 2011/7/4 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>: |
| 2 | > After syncing, some heavy packages wanted to rebuild because of the |
| 3 | > "hardened" USE flag. (I don't use the hardened profile, but they wanted to |
| 4 | > rebuild anyway.) Really heavy stuff including libreoffice and firefox-5. |
| 5 | > It took a few hours. Then, next resync, and the same packages want to |
| 6 | > rebuild again because of the "hardened" USE flag :-/ |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Anyone else getting this? These are big packages needing hours to get |
| 9 | > built. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Everyone will get this. The culprit is a change in the |
| 12 | pax-utils.eclass [1]. Which adds USE="hardened to every consumer" of |
| 13 | the eclass. It changes nothing for non hardened users but forces a |
| 14 | rebuild of the affected packages. This unfortunate change was reverted |
| 15 | [2] shortly afterwards, so everybody who did the recompile including |
| 16 | me :) has to do it again. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/pax-utils.eclass?r1=1.11&r2=1.12 |
| 19 | [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/pax-utils.eclass?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | Regards, |
| 23 | Daniel |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag? | Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net> |