1 |
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:57:53 Paul Varner wrote: |
2 |
> > But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses |
3 |
> > with --package-names because of the lack of support for the |
4 |
> > =category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still |
5 |
> > supports.. :) |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Hey, I'm proud of that horrible hack! |
8 |
|
9 |
Didn't say you shouldn't be. It was necessary when you made it. |
10 |
|
11 |
> However, on that note, I can't wait to get rid of it and use the |
12 |
> =category/package-version:slot syntax. I've been strongly thinking of |
13 |
> doing it in 0.2.4 which is in the pre-release cycle right now. |
14 |
|
15 |
The equal sign was a mistake. I've actually been meaning to poke you about |
16 |
that. At the same time you should drop the --emptytree parsing and just |
17 |
use --deep directly. With the circular deps in the tree now that gets much |
18 |
better results. |
19 |
|
20 |
:) |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Bo Andresen |