| 1 |
Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 2 |
> Joksim schreef: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Hello, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>I'm having hard time unmasking and installing app-arch/rpm-4.2.1. I have |
| 7 |
>>tried with: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>package.keywords and with package.unmask |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>=app-arch/rpm-4.2.1 |
| 12 |
>>app-arch/rpm ~86 |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>>but with no luck. What am I doing wrong. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> RPM-4.2.1 is neither package masked nor arch masked for x86. It is |
| 18 |
> removed from/not available to the x86 tree, as well as several others |
| 19 |
> (amd64, ppc64, ppc macos). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> eix rpm |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> * app-arch/rpm |
| 25 |
> Available versions: 4.0.4-r5 4.2 4.2-r1 -4.2.1 |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> That's what that "-" means before the version number. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> You can still install it though- if you really want; I would strongly |
| 30 |
> suggest checking the ChangeLog and b.g.o to find out what's going on, |
| 31 |
> since a package being made unavailable to any part of the Portage tree |
| 32 |
> indicates serious issues-- by adding the following to |
| 33 |
> /etc/portage/package.keywords: |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> app-arch/rpm -x86 (or -amd64 or -ppc64, or -ppc macos, depending on what |
| 36 |
> you're using) |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> But I wouldn't expect it to compile, or be worth the trouble it's likely |
| 39 |
> to cause you, all things considered. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Yes, I'm trying to install rpm on vserver and dev-libs/beecrypt depends |
| 42 |
on rpm-4.2.1. I have filled a bug: |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121046 |
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives