1 |
Top-posting because my question is about something in the linked threads... |
2 |
|
3 |
In one comment was said the following: |
4 |
|
5 |
>> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I |
6 |
>> can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy |
7 |
>> to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This already went before the Council, and the decision was that |
10 |
> INSTALL_MASK IS the working solution for opting out. If somebody |
11 |
> wants to come up with a better one and propose it they're of course |
12 |
> welcome to, but in the meantime, INSTALL_MASK is the official |
13 |
> solution. |
14 |
|
15 |
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd completely |
16 |
documented? Googling only finds references to this discussion? |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
|
20 |
Charles |
21 |
|
22 |
On 2013-07-30 6:40 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
23 |
> There is going to be resistance. Two months ago there was a huge |
24 |
> thread in gentoo-dev, because a package maintaner complained that his |
25 |
> co-maintainer added a systemd unit to the package: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85792 |
28 |
> |
29 |
> In the end, the maintainer rage-quit: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2551 |
32 |
> |
33 |
> However, this is the extreme behaviour: most developers (and rational |
34 |
> people) agree to adding systemd unit files to all packages, and we |
35 |
> have much better coverage now that some months ago. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> If users cooperate opening bugs adding systemd unit files (after |
38 |
> testing them in their machines), the coverage is going to grow even |
39 |
> faster. |