1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
2 |
> From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:iaindb@××××××××××××.au] |
3 |
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM |
4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, |
8 |
> but what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info, |
9 |
> and one of them is very deficient (in grub's case, man). The |
10 |
> description is different, less informative, and quite |
11 |
> misleading. Instead, is should say either nothing but "refer |
12 |
> to info pages"; or it should be the same as the info pages... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> would anyone agree? |
15 |
|
16 |
That is exactly what a number of packages do I think.
|
17 |
I have seen many of them that the man page and the
|
18 |
info page were identicle. More often though it looked
|
19 |
like they made a decent man page, and coppied it to info.
|
20 |
|
21 |
:-)
|
22 |
|
23 |
éí¢‹¬z¸žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |