| 1 |
A. Khattri <ajai <at> bway.net> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Are there people on the list who are using QOS, i need it to preserve |
| 4 |
> > 4MB for IP telephonie on a 100Mbit line. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Packet_Shaping |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Hey, this looks very cool. Have you implemented this with success? |
| 9 |
HTB (Hierarchial Token Buckets) are new to 2.6 and very, very cool. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Have you extended this over a wide area network, or across 2 networks |
| 12 |
connected by a VPN? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
My need is to use something like this over a wide area Frame Relay |
| 15 |
network, full of cisco and other routers. No Internet connections, |
| 16 |
but lots of diffent machine generated traffic to manage. |
| 17 |
Is this transparent to the cisco and other router configurations |
| 18 |
in a WAN deployment, or are there modifications I need to make to |
| 19 |
the cisco router configs to get this working over a private, |
| 20 |
frame relay cloud? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I guess in my case it may be easier to run internal router cards, |
| 23 |
use something like this for QOS for the applications communicating |
| 24 |
across the frame relay cloud. I have a sangoma card so I could |
| 25 |
test this on a tail circuit. What do you use to visualize the |
| 26 |
diffent types data traffic? MRTG? JFFNMS? CACTI? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Comments and ideas are most welcome. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
James |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives