| 1 |
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:06 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Why not post the details of it? All an initramfs is is an init script |
| 4 |
> > and a few binaries. Extract the init script, the initramfs file is a |
| 5 |
> > plain cpio archive, and post it here. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I did post it a week or so ago in another thread. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The init script? I didn't see it, which thread? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Yea, I know all that. They are breaking one thing to fix something else |
| 12 |
> so that they don't have to deal with fixing what they broke. I got that |
| 13 |
> a long time ago. ;-) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm coming round to the point of view that the breakage predates udev by |
| 16 |
many years. The whole idea of having four directories for binaries and |
| 17 |
two for libraries is an inelegance that I have come to accept over the |
| 18 |
years but only because it is "the way we have always done it" |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 25 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 26 |
A: Top-posting. |
| 27 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? |
Archives