1 |
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:31:38 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Because the behaviour changed to something that is the exact opposite |
4 |
> without any warning. Portage always used to tell what it will do. Now, |
5 |
> simply by leaving the relevant options at the default, it tells me |
6 |
> what it should do. How much more contrary to reasonable expectation |
7 |
> can you get? |
8 |
|
9 |
It's not the exact opposite. Portage is still telling you what it needs, |
10 |
but all in one go, not one problem at a time. |
11 |
|
12 |
> Imagine if tcpwrappers did this. Imagine that hosts.deny was dropped |
13 |
> and hosts.allow retained, also imagine that the desired config file |
14 |
> name becomes hosts.tcpd but it will use hosts.allow if hosts.tcpd is |
15 |
> not found. Now also imagine that the default interpretation of |
16 |
> hosts.tcpd is now default deny, explicit allow. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> All your rules now suddenly invert. Chaos ensues. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Sure, it's a contrived example, |
21 |
|
22 |
Not only contrived, but irrelevant. Because tcpwrappers actually does |
23 |
something. If your USE flags are unsuitable, portage actually does |
24 |
nothing. All that's changed is how it tells you why it has done nothing. |
25 |
|
26 |
> Few people will argue against the existence of the new unmask options. |
27 |
> Folk who want it can use it. Just don't make it the default in such a |
28 |
> way that it catches old time users by surprise. |
29 |
|
30 |
I must admit, although I read about the new option, probably in an elog |
31 |
message, I was surprised the first time it kicked in when I hadn't turned |
32 |
it on. Although it was not a bad surprised and I then recalled that the |
33 |
message had explained that this was now the default behaviour. |
34 |
|
35 |
One of the unwritten rules of Gentoo is that if you don't read elog |
36 |
messages, you can expect to get burned. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Neil Bothwick |
41 |
|
42 |
What do you do when you see an endangered animal eating an endangered |
43 |
plant? |