Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: me <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:19:32
Message-Id: AANLkTikPdsT04CiDu8qyic=t4drq8wsat5d3zC=hzFoz@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB by Dale
1 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Dale wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Well, at least we know there is a problem and it isn't just us.   If you
5 >> find something, let us know.   I would hate to know I had to try to watch a
6 >> DVD right now.  I doubt it would even start up.  o_O
7 >>
8 >> BTW, hal is disabled on xorg here.  It's enabled on other things but not
9 >> xorg.
10 >>
11 >> Dale
12 >>
13 >> :-)  :-)
14 >>
15 >
16 > I have a update.  Check this out:
17 >
18 > root@smoker / # glxgears
19 > Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
20 > approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
21 > 1380 frames in 5.0 seconds = 275.147 FPS
22 > 242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.345 FPS
23 > 241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.191 FPS
24 > 246 frames in 5.0 seconds = 49.056 FPS
25 > 240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.902 FPS
26 > 238 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.453 FPS
27 > 238 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.566 FPS
28 > 240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.839 FPS
29 > 244 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.577 FPS
30 > 242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.257 FPS
31 > 241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.196 FPS
32 > 242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.380 FPS
33 > 238 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.573 FPS
34 > 238 frames in 5.0 seconds = 47.596 FPS
35 > 241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 48.168 FPS
36 > XIO:  fatal IO error 22 (Invalid argument) on X server ":0.0"
37 >      after 900 requests (900 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
38 > root@smoker / #
39 >
40 >
41 > What did I do you ask?  Well, I did this:
42 >
43 > root@smoker / # eselect opengl list
44 > Available OpenGL implementations:
45 >  [1]   nvidia *
46 >  [2]   xorg-x11
47 > root@smoker / # eselect opengl set 1
48 > Switching to nvidia OpenGL interface... done
49 > root@smoker / #
50 >
51 > Yea, it SAID it was already set but I told it to set it again anyway.  Now I
52 > get some good frame rates again.  Excuse me while I go watch some videos I
53 > been wanting to watch but got tired of the spit and sputter.  lol
54 >
55 > YEPPIE ! ! !   It breathes again.
56 >
57 > Dale
58 >
59 > :-)  :-)
60 >
61 > P. S.  Bonus points if someone can explain why that worked.  o_O
62
63 It's been a while since I last had X + accelerated 3D on any of my
64 systems here (my gaming box's running W7), but it would be my guess
65 that, while Nvidia's libraries *were* configured as the GL
66 implementation to be used, in the process of the last driver upgrade
67 they got overwritten with upgraded versions, running things that
68 should have referenced them failed and defaulted to mesa's libraries,
69 and you got stuck with CPU based 3D rendering. Upon using eselect to
70 set it to Nvidia's again, however, you refreshed the links to the
71 proper, updated, libraries and things started using the GPU again.
72
73 This is, of course, entirely a guess, and is at least moderately
74 broken by this from glxinfo:
75
76 server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
77
78 Still... it's the best guess I have at 1:17 AM here, my time.
79
80 --
81 Poison [BLX]
82 Joshua M. Murphy