Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)?

There is a very small web server called "thttpd" which is very
lightweight and lets start serving files very quickly.
  It runs on my home router machine with an old Pentium CPU and several
megabytes of RAM and seems to consume about 500 kb of it.

  Regards,
    Vladimir

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:36:22 -0500
Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:

> Isn't there a kernelland HTTP server? ISTR seeing the option. I don't
> know anything about it, though.
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, microcai
> <microcai@×××××××××××××.org> wrote:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/
> >
> > run with systemd or xinetd
> >
> >
> >
> > 于 2011年11月14日 18:05, J. Roeleveld 写道:
> >> On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>>> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the
> >>>> 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS?
> >>>>
> >>>> So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of
> >>>> NFS-sharing vs
> >>>> HTTP-sharing? The scenario is back-end LAN at the office, thus, a
> >>>> trusted
> >>>> network by definition.
> >>>
> >>> NFS doesn't like when it looses connection to the server. The only
> >>> problems I had ever with NFS were because I forgot to unmout it
> >>> before a server restart or when I  took a computer (laptop) off
> >>> to another network...
> >>
> >> NFS-shares can work, but these need to be umounted before network
> >> goes. If server goes, problems can occur there as well.
> >> But that is true with any server/client filesharing. (CIFS/Samba,
> >> for instance)
> >>
> >>> Otherwise it works well, esp. when mounted ro on the clients,
> >>> however for distfiles it might make sense to allow the clients
> >>> download and save tarballs that are not there yet ;), though I
> >>> never used it with many computer emerging/downloading same same
> >>> stuff, so can't say if locking etc works correctly...
> >>
> >> Locking works correctly, have had 5 machines share the same
> >> NFS-shared distfiles and all downloading the source-files.
> >>
> >>> And with NFS the clients won't duplicate the files in their own
> >>> distfiles directories ;)
> >>
> >> Big plus, for me :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Joost
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> :wq
>
>


----- 
 <v_2e@×××.net>