Re: [gentoo-user] Portage, network less install and Apache, MySQL, PHP

[Daniel da Veiga]

Thank you, will try that on monday and see how it goes...

On 10/1/05, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales
<raphael.melo21@×××××.com> wrote:
> Answer to 1:
> Yes, if you download a portage-<timestamp>.tar.bz2 file and uncompress
> it on /usr/portage, it has the same effect as emerge --sync. Actually,
> to be more precise, the same effect as emerge-webrsync. Unforunately,
> this consumes more bandwidth, since it downloads ebuilds you don't
> need to update as well. But, in a proxy enviroment that doesn't allow
> rsync, it is the only choice you have.
>
> Answer to 2:
> Portage doesn't really care how you download the source packages, as
> long as they have the same md5sum. So, if you download them separetely
> and move them to /usr/portage/distfiles, you should be fine.
> Answer to 3:
> See 1 and 2. :)
>
> 2005/9/30, Daniel da Veiga <danieldaveiga@×××××.com>:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I just managed to install (network less Universal CD install) Gentoo
> > on my Pentium 100 with 48MB of RAM (yeah, it was hard, but I got the
> > fastest system this poor hardware ever had), its working fine with
> > minimal on everything, but as I have limited network access (proxy), I
> > can't update, neither the usual emerge --sync nor emerge-webrsync
> > works, the RSYNC is blocked for sure, and I suppose webrsync is trying
> > to download something (all downloads are filtered, except for some
> > extensions, but tar.bz2 and tar.gz are filtered).
> >
> > I scheduled the download of the last portage tree (snapshot) and MySQL
> > and Apache latest versions and its dependencies, but I'm pretty sure I
> > won't be able to install them, because when calculating dependencies,
> > emerge fails (too old for the latest versions, and they're masked).
> >
> > So, I ask:
> >
> > 1) If I get the latest snapshot, will it be like an "emerge --sync"?
> > 2) If I download all packages and dependencies, will I be able to
> > install the masked version after pretending the "sync" with the
> > snapshot?
> > 3) Has anyone tried this?
> >
> > If I manage to install it, I'll get like 4 new servers using
> > replication with hardware that would be trash nowadays (that's good
> > for business).
> >
> > Thanks for all answers,
> >
> > --
> > Daniel da Veiga
> > Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1
> > GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
> > PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
>
>


--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

-- 
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list