1 |
From the dev mailing list: |
2 |
|
3 |
# Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> (21 Aug 2016) |
4 |
# Dead for a long time in favour of hopm, bug #473754. |
5 |
# Removal in a month. |
6 |
net-misc/bopm |
7 |
|
8 |
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> On 08/25/2016 07:29 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
11 |
> > I still use bopm, and it built fine last time I emerged it. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > If hopm isn't in the tree yet, why was bopm still pmasked for removal? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Reason for asking is I'm curious about removal procedures. I was under |
16 |
> > the impression that replacement packages get added to the tree before |
17 |
> > their obsolete predecessors get pmasked for booting out. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > And if that's not the case, should it be? |
20 |
> That's a good question, best answered by the developer who chose to have |
21 |
> the package removed. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
25 |
> OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
26 |
> fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |