Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60%
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:05:13
Message-Id: 53AA587F.8090300@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% by "J. Roeleveld"
1 J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 > On 25 June 2014 01:09:03 CEST, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> Howdy,
4 >>
5 >> I run this test every once in a while. How bad is this:
6 >>
7 >> root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdc
8 >> smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.14.0-gentoo] (local
9 >> build)
10 >> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke,
11 >> www.smartmontools.org
12 >>
13 >> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
14 >> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
15 >> Num Test_Description Status Remaining
16 >> LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
17 >> # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60%
18 >> 16365 2905482560
19 >> # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60%
20 >> 16352 2905482560
21 >> # 3 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
22 >> 8044 -
23 >> # 4 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
24 >> 3121 -
25 >>
26 >> And better yet, is there any way to tell it to not use that part and
27 >> finish the test? It seems it stopped when it got to that, or I think
28 >> it
29 >> did.
30 >>
31 >> Thoughts?
32 >>
33 >> Dale
34 >>
35 >> :-) :-)
36 > Dale,
37 >
38 > Not sure how to get it to go past. Think that is in the firmware of the disk.
39 >
40 > I would start with making a backup first.
41 >
42 > --
43 > Joost
44
45 That's a 3TB drive. I don't have anything big enough to back it up to.
46 Is there anyway to find out if this error is really serious or just a
47 run of the mill type error? I would think that if it was a run of the
48 mill error the drive would handle the error itself and I wouldn't even
49 see it. Something like marking the area as bad and just not trying to
50 use it anymore, even for the test.
51
52 Thanks. Any advice is appreciated. I need a hard drive guru. ;-)
53
54 Here is additional info:
55
56 root@fireball / # hdparm -i /dev/sdc
57
58 /dev/sdc:
59
60 Model=ST3000DM001-9YN166, FwRev=CC4C, SerialNo=Z1F0PKT5
61 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
62 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
63 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=unknown, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
64 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=5860533168
65 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
66 PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
67 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
68 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
69 AdvancedPM=yes: unknown setting WriteCache=enabled
70 Drive conforms to: unknown: ATA/ATAPI-4,5,6,7
71
72 * signifies the current active mode
73
74 root@fireball / #
75
76
77
78 Dale
79
80 :-) :-)
81
82 --
83 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% thegeezer <thegeezer@×××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>