Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage no longer in world?
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:59:06
Message-Id: 1312199833.27562.9.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] portage no longer in world? by Joost Roeleveld
1 On Monday, August 1 at 12:41 (+0200), Joost Roeleveld said:
2
3 > On Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:02:22 AM Florian Philipp wrote:
4 > > @system used to contain portage. It doesn't by default, anymore. If
5 > you
6 > > do `emerge -pv --depclean`, portage should try to remove itself.
7 > Just
8 > > add it to @world by doing `emerge --noreplace portage`
9 >
10 > It doesn't try this on my system
11
12 Yeah, I don't think that statement was entirely accurate. Deplean
13 "normally" will not try to remove portage, because it satisfies the
14 virtual/package-manager requirement, which is in @system.
15
16 If, however, you have portage and another package satisfying
17 virtual/package-manager installed, and the other package was in your
18 world file, but portage wasn't then depclean *would* remove portage.
19 This is the recent behavior change, which is why some people were
20 surprised suddenly when nano or less or
21 insert_your_favorite_virtual_here was suddenly wanting to get unmerged
22 by --depclean.