Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

[Dale]

Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where multipart/alternative went through.
>
> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by default, and might design an email client to not support multipart/alternative at all in composed messages.
>
> Tom
>

Someone pointed out that it likely did that with that message because
the message I was replying to was HTML.  It seems that if I reply to a
HTML message, it ignores my settings.  I think it should obey the
settings regardless myself as settings should override what it is
replying too. 

At least I know that messages by default are being sent correctly.  That
should correct the vast majority of them. 

Thanks again to all.

Dale

:-)  :-)