| 1 |
200206 Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, |
| 4 |
> so your links above look correct as far as I can tell. |
| 5 |
> Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference |
| 6 |
> are 2 distinct packages. The OP presumably has the latter. |
| 7 |
> Both of them existing may be the real bug here. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
FWIW my own set-up seems to support that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
872: ~> ls -l /usr/lib64/liblapack.* |
| 12 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.3 |
| 13 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 -> liblapack.so.3.8.0 |
| 14 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6637008 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.8.0 |
| 15 |
873: ~> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
When I checked earlier today, there were broken symlinks to lapack-reference , |
| 18 |
but deleting them made no difference : the pkg isn't installed. |
| 19 |
Octave opens & calculates '1+1' without any problems. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
So the solution to the OP's problem mb simply to unmerge lapack-reference . |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
========================,,============================================ |
| 25 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
| 26 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
| 27 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
Archives