Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthias Fechner <idefix@×××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Monitor SATA with smart? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:51:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070418124247.GB14202@server.idefix.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Monitor SATA with smart? by Alexander Skwar |
||
| 1 | Hello Alexander, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | * Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> [18-04-07 12:35]: |
| 4 | > Keep in mind though, that SMART doesn't give you reliable information, |
| 5 | > though. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Message-ID: <544vb6F1v7oqgU1@××××××××××××××.net> |
| 8 | > http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5038 |
| 9 | > http://storagemojo.com/?p=383 |
| 10 | > http://www.usenix.org/events/fast07/tech/schroeder/schroeder_html/index.html |
| 11 | > http://216.239.37.132/papers/disk_failures.pdf |
| 12 | |
| 13 | thx a lot for your links. It was really nice and informative to read. |
| 14 | It's clear that smart is not reliability but it is better then |
| 15 | nothing. And smart protected my (backup-upped) data two times and that is |
| 16 | really a good rate :) |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Best regards, |
| 19 | Matthias |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | |
| 23 | "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to |
| 24 | build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to |
| 25 | produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- |
| 26 | Rich Cook |
| 27 | -- |
| 28 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Monitor SATA with smart? | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |