| 1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > 'autounmask kde-4.2' did not work..... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> So autounmask does not understand sets. Either append the set file to |
| 8 |
> package.keywords |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Ok, |
| 11 |
On my next 4.2.x kde install, I'll try this approach with autounmask. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 >>/etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 14 |
> Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets |
| 15 |
> file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more |
| 16 |
> manageable option. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Interesting approach. I usually like to follow the gentoo recommended |
| 20 |
practices. I get the feeling that "sets" via portage 2.2 is very |
| 21 |
much a work in progress. So which of these approaches is likely |
| 22 |
to become the de'facto method? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Also, I omitted the "~amd64" at the end of all of those manual |
| 26 |
entries into my package.keywords file. It work without them. |
| 27 |
So my question is the "-amd64" entry on every line of my package.keywords |
| 28 |
deprecated now with portage 2.2? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
James |
Archives