| 1 |
On 8/21/06, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:27:14 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > So it is not *that* constrained in terms of RAM and disk, I assume. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > But I am also ready to go the -Os-way if you recommend/suggest it for my |
| 7 |
> > system. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Many laptops have relatively poor memory and HD speed, irrespective of |
| 10 |
> their capacity. -Os helps with slow IO. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm just curious. The last time I participated in a -O2 vs. -Os |
| 14 |
discussion was 1 -1/2 to 2 years ago. There were certain software |
| 15 |
components (don't remember which) where -Os was contraindicated - |
| 16 |
warnings against compiling them with -Os. Have things progressed to |
| 17 |
the point where -Os can be generally recommended? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Collins Richey |
| 22 |
If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries |
| 23 |
of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives