Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:57:58
Message-Id: 20090731095748.5e653814@zaphod.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones by Helmut Jarausch
1 On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:46:17 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
2
3 > No, on the 'master' machine I have in /etc/make.conf
4 > FEATURES="buildpkg -stricter"
5 >
6 > and on the clones I use '-k'.
7 >
8 > But still, portage checks dependencies on the clone.
9 > And, if it sees a problem (like those when upgrading to kde-4
10 > or qt-4.5.x) it refused to merge the binary package.
11
12 Those sort of blocks, such as when switching from monolithic to split
13 ebuilds, are rare and easily dealt with. Dealing with unexpected side
14 effects of syncing in-use files could be a lot more problematic.
15
16
17 --
18 Neil Bothwick
19
20 All mail what i send is thoughly proof-red, definately!

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] maintaining clones Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>