1 |
Nick Rout wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:38 +0200, Frank Schafer wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 17:51 -0500, John Jolet wrote: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>>On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Christoph Gysin wrote: |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>>>John Jolet wrote: |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>>>>yeah, if it's got a firewall disallowing icmp responses. then you |
18 |
>>>>>can do nmap -P0 to find it. ping would never find it. It's gotta |
19 |
>>>>>have SOME port open. |
20 |
>>>>> |
21 |
>>>>> |
22 |
>>>>> |
23 |
>>>>As far as I've read his post, there's no firewall involved. So why |
24 |
>>>>should he do portscans in all hosts on the subnet? |
25 |
>>>> |
26 |
>>>> |
27 |
>>>> |
28 |
>>>> |
29 |
>>>>>Also, nmap can do os fingerprinting and probably show you which |
30 |
>>>>>one is the solaris or sunos machine... |
31 |
>>>>> |
32 |
>>>>> |
33 |
>>>>> |
34 |
>>>>Sure, but that's not what he's looking for... |
35 |
>>>> |
36 |
>>>> |
37 |
>>>> |
38 |
>>>perhaps I read the initial post wrong...I was under the impression |
39 |
>>>that he had a headless sun box with a static ip on a known subnet, |
40 |
>>>but the exact ip wasn't known. |
41 |
>>> |
42 |
>>> |
43 |
>>... what about arp? |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> |
46 |
> |
47 |
>That was the answer given in an alomst identical problem recently on |
48 |
>this list (or was it another??) |
49 |
> |
50 |
>arp will rely on the box having actually done something within arp's |
51 |
>cache period. |
52 |
> |
53 |
>if there is no network activity, there may be no arp entry. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
>>Just a thought |
58 |
>>Frank |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> |
61 |
ping broadcast ? |
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |