Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 01:48:22
Message-Id: 7573e9640605031810w55e4fedycca911cac2e9868e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel vs. gentoo-sources by "S. Schwartz"
1 On 5/3/06, S. Schwartz <sigi.schwartz@×××××××××××××.de> wrote:
2 > Richard Fish wrote:
3 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127618
4 > Thanks for the link, very interesting indeed.
5 >
6 > In comment #18 someone says that Nvidia won't release a newer legacy
7 > driver set any time soon, whereas in the nVNews-forum someone from
8 > NVIDIA Corporation announced that an updated legacy graphics driver is
9 > planned for the near future. That one should match 1.0-8756.
10 >
11 > Sounds pretty bad and good at the same time. Still: isn't someone of the
12 > Gentoo-guys (experienced in patching) able to patch the old 6629 for the
13 > time being or do I simply underestimate the effort?
14
15 The fact that no patch has been forthcoming, either from Gentoo or
16 someone on the nvnews forums, is probably an indicator that there is
17 no developer with all of:
18
19 a. A card requiring the legacy drivers.
20 b. A need to use 2.6.16+.
21 c. Knowledge of what needs to be done to fix the drivers.
22 d. The motivation to spend time supporting a proprietary driver.
23
24 As Chris indicated, you are being screwed by NVidia. Their 7174
25 drivers are broken, and they are being very slow to fix them. The
26 previous release is stable, but won't work with new kernels. Pretty
27 much the same old story of proprietary drivers on Linux unfortunately.
28
29 -Richard
30
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list