1 |
On Monday 29 October 2007 10:40:08 am Grant Edwards wrote: |
2 |
> On 2007-10-29, b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Dan Farrell ha scritto: |
4 |
> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:13:25 +0100 |
5 |
> >> "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> >> Think of an AP as a way to connect wireless interfaces to the same |
7 |
> >> switch/hub as you can the wired connections. They usually bridge the |
8 |
> >> connections. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> You're probably right; you only need an AP, because you likely already |
11 |
> >> have a gateway/router. They sell for about $20 us around here, if you |
12 |
> >> get them on the web. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Exactly what I thought. Thanks. |
15 |
> > As for the brand, is Netgear stuff so bad? Here these gadgets seem to be |
16 |
> > more costly, and Netgears cost much less than Linksys stuff. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I've had good luck with Buffalo AP/routers and xwrt firmware. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> Grant Edwards grante Yow! Now we can become |
22 |
> at alcoholics! |
23 |
> visi.com |
24 |
|
25 |
Do you really need router functionality? If not, I've had tremendous success |
26 |
with SENAO brand WAPs... namely |
27 |
|
28 |
http://www.wlansolution.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=NCB%2D3220 |
29 |
|
30 |
Excellent, if all you really need is 802.11b or g and basic WAP features. |
31 |
Setup is via web browserand it delivers 400mw of power. Goes through most |
32 |
anything and makes just about all other name brand stuff look dismally |
33 |
weak... |
34 |
|
35 |
Usually I set these up behind a linux firewall on their own subnet and |
36 |
ipchain/iptable access to users as needed. Works really, really well. |
37 |
|
38 |
Oh... almost forgot, it's a linux appliance and supports remote syslog |
39 |
feature. |
40 |
|
41 |
Cheers. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride |
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |