1 |
Am 31.10.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Peter Humphrey: |
2 |
> On Friday 31 October 2014 15:09:26 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I've got a few systems where grub1 doesn't work. This is more likely caused |
5 |
>> by some changes in used filesystems instead of any other cause. |
6 |
>> If I really wanted to, I might get it to work, but I don't see the point in |
7 |
>> spending time on this. |
8 |
>> Grub starts the boot process and then, afaik, disappears. |
9 |
>> Which is sufficient for me. |
10 |
> My grub-0.99 lets me choose from four kernels and two or three run levels at |
11 |
> boot time, and grub-2 can't handle this yet, or it couldn't the last time I |
12 |
> checked. I don't suggest that everyone has a similar need, but at least in |
13 |
> some cases the old grub does still have a place. |
14 |
> |
15 |
grub2 best feature is the |
16 |
'run mkconfig after each kernel update or you will boot something old |
17 |
and outdated' |
18 |
|
19 |
I really love that. Or its configs. Once grub's configs were nice, clean |
20 |
and easy. grub2 put away with those shenanigans. |
21 |
|
22 |
Seriously, I regularly ask myself what brain sickness infected those |
23 |
poor guys. |