1 |
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
> > In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to |
4 |
> > current 2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so |
7 |
> > far makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all |
8 |
> > those answers somewhere so whatever test is done for each line |
9 |
> > could be dispensed with for most of them. Probably would need |
10 |
> > more than 2-3 compiles to have all but rare ones answered. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Some items really check a lot of things. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I think it would be a major time saver when discussing huge |
15 |
> > numbers of compiles. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> You are expecting autoconf to actually do something sane when it |
18 |
> runs??? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Har har. |
21 |
> You must be new here. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> :-) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> That problem has been discussed about 486,212 times and solved |
26 |
> about 0 times. |
27 |
|
28 |
Fortunately, more packages go over to cmake. Just a matter of time. |
29 |
|
30 |
Uwe |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed! |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |