1 |
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: |
3 |
> > in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and |
4 |
> > -march=nocona |
5 |
> |
6 |
> OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
Itanium2. |
10 |
|
11 |
You don't want to go there. Trust me. |
12 |
|
13 |
It's a bastard evolution of one of Intel's worst ideas ever - Itanium, |
14 |
which was their first 64 bit effort. Only HP ever used it and it was a |
15 |
disaster in the market. Windows and Linux have never run on it. AMD did |
16 |
it right with amd64 which Intel copied as emt64. Meanwhile Itanium2 |
17 |
came along, called IA64 in Linux terms. The only place you will ever |
18 |
see this architecture is in a data centre, and the machine will be at |
19 |
least 8 years old. |
20 |
|
21 |
alan |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Alan McKinnon |
27 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |