Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Latest chromium-40 on ~x86
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:04:13
Message-Id: 20150125140348.da42e78eee2bb3c4421d4e36@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Latest chromium-40 on ~x86 by Nils Holland
1 On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:43:41 +0100 Nils Holland wrote:
2 > Hi folks,
3 >
4 > I've been using chromium successfully on my ~x86 system for quite a
5 > long time, but starting with the last two updates that came in during
6 > the last few days (namely, chromium-40.0.2214.85 and
7 > chromium-40.0.2214.91), I started having problems.
8 >
9 > Both of these versions build just fine, but upon trying to launch
10 > them, the browser's interface comes up just fine, but will only
11 > display a "Something went wrong..." page. I can try typing in and
12 > accessing URLs, but all I will ever get is this error page.
13 >
14 > That's not all, though, I also get to see error messages, namely the
15 > following in my terminal:
16 >
17 > ../../sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf-helpers/sigsys_handlers.cc:**CRASHING**:seccomp-bpf
18 > failure in syscall 0265
19 >
20 > And this here in dmesg:
21 >
22 > chrome[5274]: segfault at e806109 ip b5c5c945 sp ac280980 error 6 in
23 > chrome[b1864000+5eed000]
24 >
25 > Great, I thought, something wrong with the sandbox stuff. So I tried
26 > to launch chromium without it ("chromium --no-sandbox"), and indeed:
27 > The browser works absolutely fine this way - I get none of the
28 > problems or messages mentioned above.
29 >
30 > Of course, I tried to find a related entry in both the Gentoo as well
31 > as the chromium bug trackers, but I couldn't find anything in either.
32 > I'm a bit reluctand to report my own bug as I wouldn't be 100% sure
33 > that I'm not causing the problem (after all, I'm building my chromium
34 > with USE=custom-cflags, which is not officially supported, but has
35 > always produced nicely working builds for me in the past), so I
36 > thought I'd ask here first if I'm the only one observing this
37 > behavior.
38 >
39 > The question, thus, would probably be: Anyone using one of the recent
40 > chromium-40 versions on ~x86 or anywhere else and seeing something
41 > similar? Or probably someone who has experienced something like that
42 > before and could offer a guess what might be wrong here - a real bug,
43 > custom-cflags, or something entirely different?
44
45 I gave up on chromium starting from chromium-36, where they dropped
46 pre-SSE2 x86 support (and I use such system: Athlon-XP). I tried to
47 re-add this stuff with partial success (works, but still SIGILLs
48 sometimes) and it's very hard to clean all pieces. Looks like
49 they're slowly abandoning x86 and older hardware at all.
50
51 Best regards,
52 Andrew Savchenko

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Latest chromium-40 on ~x86 Nils Holland <nholland@×××××.org>