| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 05:47 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Stroller |
| 2 |
did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 18/11/2010, at 1:46am, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> ... |
| 6 |
> >> Looks like the *actual* problem is non-application of OYFEAL[1],not what |
| 7 |
> >> the devs do. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Google doesn't seem to know what OYFEAL means. Do we get any hints? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yes, if you're patient he'll give you [1]. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Note to self: stop composing mails at 3 in the morning. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So it *should* have gone like this: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
====== |
| 19 |
Looks like the *actual* problem is non-application of OYFEAL[1],not what the |
| 20 |
devs do. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
<insert arb stuff here> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[1] Open Your F*cking Eyes And Look |
| 25 |
====== |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
It's an old hangover from my bench techies days when I had juniors who |
| 29 |
insisted on assuming they knew the cause of a problem even before they'd taken |
| 30 |
the covers off the faulty unit |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives