| 1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 2 |
> From: matthew.garman@×××××.com [mailto:matthew.garman@×××××.com] |
| 3 |
> Sent: 02 March 2006 15:54 |
| 4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mysterious segfaults |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:23:17PM -0000, Michael Kintzios wrote: |
| 9 |
> > If the application of a domestic cooling fan does not relieve the |
| 10 |
> > problem, then it could well be faulty memory module(s), or a |
| 11 |
> > faulty power supply. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'm afraid it's a random hardware failure. I've been running |
| 14 |
> cpuburn for the last couple hours. According to sensors, my cpu has |
| 15 |
> reached a max temp of 57 degress C. No segfaults thus far. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> It's been several months ago, but I did run about eight hours of |
| 18 |
> memtest86 on the memory. Is it unusual for memory to work fine for |
| 19 |
> a while and *then* go bad? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I might try a new power supply anyway. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> For what it's worth, mysterious problems on this box have come and |
| 24 |
> gone for probably a year now. Every time something comes up, it's |
| 25 |
> so random that I don't even know where to start looking. I'm this |
| 26 |
> -> <- close to building a whole new PC :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
No two PC's/MoBos are the same, but FWIW here's a bed time story: I had |
| 29 |
three incompatible memory sticks on mine which kept failing at random. |
| 30 |
MEMTEST86+ did not show any errors. Occasionally, a simple emerge |
| 31 |
--sync was enough to crash the machine and needless to say all these |
| 32 |
repeated crashes had started to corrupt my fs. Running out of ideas I |
| 33 |
decided to start removing memory sticks until I discovered that the best |
| 34 |
result (in terms of stability) could only be arrived at if I left only |
| 35 |
one 256M stick of branded memory in the box. That was despite the fact |
| 36 |
that the MoBo manual said you could mix 'n match memory modules without |
| 37 |
any adverse effect on performance... :p |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
In case you're suffering from the same problem, check whether a crash is |
| 40 |
more likely if them machine is about to switch to the next bank of |
| 41 |
memory/swap. Mine invariably crashed most times it was getting ready to |
| 42 |
swap data to the hard drive, or in any case as soon as it had used all |
| 43 |
the memory on the first stick. What drove me insane with this fault was |
| 44 |
that it would only crash once and thereafter it was often good until the |
| 45 |
next reboot. Also, if the transition from the first memory stick to the |
| 46 |
second or swap space, was caused by an application engaging in |
| 47 |
aggressive resource usage (e.g. Opera loading font files when it hits a |
| 48 |
website with Chinese characters) a crash was guaranteed. Slowly |
| 49 |
building up to it during a large emerge session would not cause any |
| 50 |
crashes. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
I hope this helps. |
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
Regards, |
| 55 |
Mick |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives