1 |
On 4/26/06, Jannis Achstetter <jannis_achstetter@×××.de> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Well, I play UT2K4 here and it works. It ain't super-blazing (1,6GHz, |
4 |
> 512MB RAM, 128MB-Graphics-RAM so can't be too good for such hungry |
5 |
> games) but playable without any problems. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
Glad to here that! |
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> > I used them a while ago, but they were quite crappy. Can you do |
12 |
> > heavy 3D with them without pulling your hair out? |
13 |
> What do you mean by "heavy 3D"? Hardware-accelerated image-rendering |
14 |
> or games? I'm happy with 250FPS in Quake3Arena to be honest. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
I was just refering to something more heavy than an Opengl screensaver. I |
18 |
guess UT2K4 falls in that category. |
19 |
|
20 |
I don't say you have to but if I were you I would: |
21 |
> - - update the xorg to 7.X |
22 |
> - - build agpgart for your chipset into the kernel |
23 |
> - - build the DRM for the ATI Radeon into the kernel |
24 |
> - - configure xorg to use the "radeon"-driver (This is not just changing |
25 |
> one line, you will have to reconfigure the whole section because the |
26 |
> different drivers use different parameters) |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Is there a specific reason you suggest the Radeon driver from the kernel and |
30 |
not from the ebuild? AFAIK, the one you can emerge is more up to date most |
31 |
of the time. |
32 |
|
33 |
But, I'll give it a try, I'm really getting tired of this. If the DRM driver |
34 |
really works as good as you say, I will be glad to drop ati-drivers! |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Ghislain Bourgeois |
38 |
--- |
39 |
Linux System administrator |