Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: tuxic@××××××.de
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:42:49
Message-Id: 20180226184232.dfphxqpdyp2aratk@solfire
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless? by Peter Humphrey
1 On 02/26 03:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
2 > On Monday, 26 February 2018 14:52:25 GMT Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
3 > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:46:00 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
4 > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>
5 > wrote:
6 > > >> I've been using --changed-deps when doing a world upgrade ever since
7 > > >> the
8 > > >> news item that recommended it.
9 > > >>
10 > > >> However, today, this is what --changed-deps resulted in:
11 > > >> https://pastebin.com/raw/7RBx6zzt
12 > > >>
13 > > >> This is not OK. What the hell? This is just plain broken.
14 > > >
15 > > > Someone probably changed a dependency in a commonly used eclass. I
16 > > > would guess portage is operating as expected.
17 > >
18 > > As the pastebin log says it's automake-1.16 for ~arch, and
19 > > since automake is used everywhere..
20 >
21 > Well, I'm on amd64, not ~amd64, and this morning portage wanted to remerge
22 > 217 packages. Removing --changed-deps reduced that to one: sys-devel/llvm.
23 >
24 > --
25 > Regards,
26 > Peter.
27 >
28 >
29
30 Hi Peter,
31
32 luky you...I got 462 packages to recompile...
33
34 Cheers
35 Meino

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless? Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>