1 |
On December 24, 2018 5:17:57 PM vsnsdualce@××××××××.net wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but |
4 |
> instead women. |
5 |
> Just like in all the anglo-american conquered world. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> We, the men who actually do work, are treated as the same worker-slaves |
8 |
> everywhere. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Opensource was a refuge from the worthless cunts (who ban us from having |
11 |
> anything good, such as cute young child brides (allowed by YHWH)) |
12 |
> but has not been for some time now. Part and parcel of anglo culture: |
13 |
> the man is a dog, the wwuuuummmannn is a Noble. |
14 |
> |
15 |
wtf is this toxicity? Not enough hugs from mommy? |
16 |
|
17 |
> Now that Linus has caved all is lost. |
18 |
|
19 |
imo, Linus has done well to overcome some of his buddies for (probably) |
20 |
being on the spectrum. Well done to him and I hope we can all learn a thing |
21 |
or two. |
22 |
|
23 |
> |
24 |
> But you can always rescind license for your copyrighted works... |
25 |
> (as-long as they are a bare license such as the gpl2). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Absent an attached interest (ie: someone paying you for use of the work, |
28 |
> or relying on your promises): you the rightsholder have the right to |
29 |
> rescind at will. |
30 |
> GPL v2 lacks such language disclaiming rescission, you made no |
31 |
> utterances that one could rely upon to suggest |
32 |
> that there would be no rescission, and you were paid no consideration |
33 |
> for your work. |
34 |
> .: You can rescind, just like any other property license. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> And yes, I am a lawyer. |
37 |
Cool. Assuming that your information isn't just more bias, that's |
38 |
interesting to know. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Men should be free to take girl children as brides and feminism should |
41 |
Are you serious here, pedobear? |
42 |
> be eliminated from the earth |
43 |
> (just as they seek to eliminate all pro-male cultures in the world) |
44 |
Just like with guys, there are radicals. The true heart of feminism is |
45 |
equality, not ownership and degradation. I earnestly hope for your |
46 |
enlightenment. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> On 2018-12-24 14:58, Default User wrote: |
49 |
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018, 05:20 Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@×××××.com wrote: |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>>>> 500 comments at Slashdot, >200 at Phoronix and >1000 at linux org |
52 |
>>> ru! See now? |
53 |
>>> When a technical project starts making their decisions over |
54 |
>>> political reasons... |
55 |
>>> rather than technical, it is doomed. Good time to switch to a |
56 |
>>> similar distro.... |
57 |
>>> with mentally sane leadership, like Devuan. Also what's good about |
58 |
>>> Devuan : |
59 |
>>> |
60 |
>>> Devuan does not use SystemDick as its' init system! SystemD contains |
61 |
>>>> 1 million |
62 |
>>> lines of bloated code and lots of vulnerabilities have been found |
63 |
>>> there and |
64 |
>>> countless haven't, also the SystemD creators are arrogant and refuse |
65 |
>>> to fix many |
66 |
>>> discovered security vulnerabilities, to a point where they've been |
67 |
>>> awarded a |
68 |
>>> " Pwnie award " for refusing to fix a critical vuln. |
69 |
>>> |
70 |
>>> That is why I prefer the distros which are using something else as |
71 |
>>> init system: |
72 |
>>> either good old SysV, or something more modern like OpenRC (at Artix |
73 |
>>> Linux) or |
74 |
>>> runit (at Void Linux) , just not systemd! There are only a few such |
75 |
>>> distros left |
76 |
>>> because of Redhat pressure, and luckily Devuan is one of them. |
77 |
>>> If you found Debian as useful before it went nuts then maybe you'd |
78 |
>>> like Devuan, |
79 |
>>> or even some other distros that I mentioned: Artix Linux =Arch with |
80 |
>>> a human face |
81 |
>>> (has GUI + everything configured by default, nice GUI package |
82 |
>>> manager and |
83 |
>>> convenient to use even for the beginners), and Void Linux -amazingly |
84 |
>>> fast distro |
85 |
>>> really suitable for old PCs, but lacks some packages so you'd need |
86 |
>>> to compile |
87 |
>>> the things from source once in a while, in comparison Artix has |
88 |
>>> almost the same |
89 |
>>> set of packages as Arch. Both Artix and Void are very stable despite |
90 |
>>> their |
91 |
>>> packages are really new and they are among the first to get new |
92 |
>>> Linux kernels |
93 |
>>> with fresh drivers. |
94 |
>>> |
95 |
>>> Or maybe MX Linux, one of the top popularity distros nowadays which |
96 |
>>> is |
97 |
>>> also "no systemd" and somehow only recently I learned about it |
98 |
>>> |
99 |
>>> Best regards, |
100 |
>>> Ivan Ivanov, |
101 |
>>> open source firmware developer |
102 |
>> |
103 |
>> How ridiculous that some pathetic questionable would spend their |
104 |
>> precious time on Earth censoring package names which contain the |
105 |
>> character string "boob". |
106 |
>> |
107 |
>> Sad. |
108 |
>> |
109 |
>>> |
110 |
> |