1 |
(Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...) |
2 |
|
3 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote : |
4 |
|
5 |
> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world |
6 |
> emerge give a different result? |
7 |
|
8 |
peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 |
9 |
Calculating dependencies ... done! |
10 |
|
11 |
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=gdbus-codegen-2.50.2". |
12 |
peak ~ # eix -e gdbus-codegen |
13 |
[I] dev-util/gdbus-codegen |
14 |
Available versions: 2.44.1 2.46.2 2.48.2 (~)2.50.0 (~)2.50.1 (~)2.50.2 {PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"} |
15 |
Installed versions: 2.50.2(18:06:24 10/01/17)(PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -python3_5") |
16 |
Homepage: http://www.gtk.org/ |
17 |
Description: GDBus code and documentation generator |
18 |
|
19 |
Something's screwed up here. I ran eclean-dist this morning and it listed 90-odd packages with versions not in the database, which was not true. Running eix-update again made no difference. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm considering building a new system, but amd64 instead of ~amd64. I only set the latter when this was a new box and too many packages needed to be the ~ versions to be manageable otherwise. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Peter. |