1 |
hasufell <hasufell <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> Our arch testers are understaffed and often don't really do general |
5 |
> runtime tests (it's mostly assumed the maintainer knows about runtime |
6 |
> issues). |
7 |
|
8 |
> I have often had a hard time to get some random users comment on |
9 |
> certain packages or even assist on some runtime tests. I don't even |
10 |
> know how many people use the package I maintain. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
When a new package is installed or upgraded, there are notes that the |
14 |
installer is optioned (and notified upon installation) about the |
15 |
package. Might it be a good idea to put your testing pleadings |
16 |
in the notes for those how install the package (stable, testing, |
17 |
experimental or overlay) about how to contact whoever related to |
18 |
the specific testing you want done? I. E. "eselect news" or is this |
19 |
a bad idea? |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
JFFNMS is one of my favorite packages, so surely I'd respond on that |
23 |
one. Hell, I often go and find the patches and post bugs pleading to |
24 |
get documented patches installed on my favorite package. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
hth, |
28 |
James |