1 |
Am 31.01.2013 10:36, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> I've booted into udev-197 but my network interfaces are named the same |
4 |
>> as ever and I've read that the new naming scheme is deactivated by |
5 |
>> default. Do you think the new naming scheme will stick? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> In the discussion in [1] the consensus seems to be that they actually |
8 |
> solve a real problem, and that they are an improvement to the old |
9 |
> scheme. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> If so, how can I activate it? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Follow the instructions at [2]. In short, eliminate |
14 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules and |
15 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. |
16 |
|
17 |
While I am fiddling around with systemd that is the perfect time to also |
18 |
try this one. Switched to the new scheme on two of my systems, no |
19 |
problems so far. |
20 |
|
21 |
What helped: |
22 |
|
23 |
on the thinkpad I use networkmanager so I didn't have to do anything ... |
24 |
|
25 |
I assume openrc-users would have to relink net.lo to the new names like |
26 |
net.enp6s0 in my case (instead of the old net.eth0)? |
27 |
|
28 |
- |
29 |
|
30 |
On the other machine with systemd I only had to edit my funny |
31 |
kvm-bridge.service to match the new NIC-device. |
32 |
|
33 |
Runs fine. |
34 |
|
35 |
In general I see the benefit in this new approach even when it means to |
36 |
let old habits go somehow. Well, we have the option to keep the good old |
37 |
naming by just setting/keeping the old udev-rules. |
38 |
|
39 |
Stefan |