1 |
On 10/29/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 29 October 2006 16:56, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: |
3 |
> > On 10/28/06, Mark Kirkwood <markir@××××××××××××.nz> wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Saturday 28 October 2006 13:31, Mark Kirkwood wrote: |
6 |
> > > >> I'd recommend changing to ext3 or xfs, as I've found both to be solid |
7 |
> > > >> (I prefer xfs but that just my personal opinion). |
8 |
> > > > |
9 |
> > > > if you use XFS don't use 2.6.17 kernels. |
10 |
> > > > ... |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > 2.6.17.8 and up work fine. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> and up to 2.6.17.5 it eats your data... |
15 |
|
16 |
That's not true. Up to 2.6.17.5 it /may/ eat your data. I ran |
17 |
2.6.17, in the buggy state, for >2 weeks before I upgraded. It did |
18 |
_not_ eat my data. Don't get me wrong - it was lucky, and yes - it's |
19 |
a heinous bug. If it just _ate_ your data, more people would have |
20 |
lost data and or filesystems. |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |