| 1 |
On 09/17/2009 01:17 PM, Per-Erik Westerberg wrote: |
| 2 |
> tor 2009-09-17 klockan 11:15 -0700 skrev walt: |
| 3 |
>> On 09/17/2009 10:37 AM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 19:21:44 schrieb walt: |
| 5 |
>>>> Two days ago after updating world on my ~amd64, at least two apps |
| 6 |
>>>> can't find libssl.so.12 even though it's right where it should be. |
| 7 |
>>>> ... |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> ...I've seen this on my box at work today. The interesting thing |
| 10 |
>>> here was that for the affected program, evolution, libssl3.so showed up four |
| 11 |
>>> times in ldd output, where three entries showed "not found" while the forth |
| 12 |
>>> showed the location of the lib. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> I also recompiled evolution and gnome-panel (those were the two apps |
| 15 |
>> that were broken) but they both depend on evolution-data-server, and |
| 16 |
>> recompiling that finally fixed it. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Now, the next question is why didn't revdep-rebuild fix it first? |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Hi, |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I'm using ~x86 and the following fixed the issue for me : |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> revdep-rebuild --library libnss3.so.12 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Interesting, thanks. Did you happen to try just plain revdep-rebuild before |
| 29 |
adding the --library flag? I'm wondering if that flag actually does something |
| 30 |
more than plain revdep-rebuild. Anyone know for sure? |
Archives