| 1 |
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:33:18 -0700 |
| 2 |
walt wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 07/22/2012 10:41 AM, David Relson wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:23:47 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> Am Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012, 09:52:06 schrieb David Relson: |
| 9 |
> >>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> how about moving that stuff away and creating a symlink to the |
| 12 |
> >> correct version? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Such a simple fix... |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 was linked to libstdc++.so.6.0.8 rather than |
| 17 |
> > 6.0.14. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > All is good now. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I'm guessing that you have more than one version of gcc on the 32-bit |
| 22 |
> machine? Any time you use gcc-config to change the working version of |
| 23 |
> gcc, the symlink to libstdc++.so will also be changed automatically to |
| 24 |
> point at the matching library version. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Nope. I only have gcc-4.5.3. Evidently symlink |
| 29 |
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 didn't get updated when libstdc++.so.6.0.14 was |
| 30 |
built. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
FWIW, the machine has the following versions of libstdc++.so |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
6.0.14 - Jul 21 2012 ( in /usr/lib/gcc/.../4.5.3 ) |
| 35 |
6.0.8 - May 15 2007 ( in /usr/lib ) |
| 36 |
6.0.6 - Aug 3 2006 ( in /usr/lib ) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
David |
Archives