| 1 |
On 30 July 2013 23:32, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I was interested in becoming a dev for a little while, but the testing |
| 4 |
> and what looks to be prolonged process kinda put me off of the idea. It |
| 5 |
> just seems like a lot of bureaucratic work. Perhaps my impression is |
| 6 |
> wrong, though... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As a tester - not AT at Gentoo - say that you are right. In the |
| 9 |
development job that activity is that which should/must be well |
| 10 |
documented or communicated to provide solid and trustworthy |
| 11 |
information. Nowadays, I experience that the line between developers |
| 12 |
and tester are getting thinner and thinner and there are development |
| 13 |
methods, such as DAD, which support this process. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On the other hand, testing activity is the safety belt which keep the |
| 16 |
quality on a certain level which produces the tribute of the users |
| 17 |
which will be the fuel for the further job. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
-- Csanyi Andras (Sayusi Ando) -- http://sayusi.hu -- |
| 21 |
http://facebook.com/andras.csanyi |
| 22 |
-- ""Trust in God and keep your gunpowder dry!" - Cromwell |
Archives