1 |
UN-subscribe -- Digest of gentoo-user@l.g.o |
2 |
|
3 |
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:06 AM, <gentoo-user+help@l.g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Topics (messages 138328 through 138377): |
6 |
> |
7 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: mplayer2 idle CPU condumption |
8 |
> 138328 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
11 |
> 138329 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: solving curl dependency issues |
14 |
> 138330 - Space Cake <spacecakex@×××××.com> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> [gentoo-user] I want to play movies without hangs [SOLVED, sort of] |
17 |
> 138331 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> [gentoo-user] HP A8 laptop install |
20 |
> 138332 - Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> [gentoo-user] Encfs suddenly read-only -- DISK FAILURE |
23 |
> 138333 - felix@×××××××.com |
24 |
> |
25 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
26 |
> 138334 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
29 |
> 138335 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
32 |
> 138336 - john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
35 |
> 138337 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
38 |
> 138338 - Alecks Gates <alecks.g@×××××.com> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
41 |
> 138339 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
42 |
> |
43 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
44 |
> 138340 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> [gentoo-user] OT: Hack your TV |
47 |
> 138341 - James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
50 |
> 138342 - Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
53 |
> 138343 - Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
54 |
> |
55 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
56 |
> 138344 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
57 |
> |
58 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
59 |
> 138345 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
62 |
> 138346 - Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> |
63 |
> |
64 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
65 |
> 138347 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
66 |
> |
67 |
> [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio |
68 |
> 138348 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
69 |
> |
70 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
71 |
> 138349 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
72 |
> |
73 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
74 |
> 138350 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
75 |
> |
76 |
> [gentoo-user] HP A8 laptop install |
77 |
> 138351 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |
78 |
> |
79 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
80 |
> 138352 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
81 |
> |
82 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
83 |
> 138353 - Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> |
84 |
> |
85 |
> [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together |
86 |
> 138354 - Urs Schutz <u.schutz@×××××××.ch> |
87 |
> |
88 |
> [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together |
89 |
> 138355 - Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> |
90 |
> |
91 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails |
92 |
> 138356 - Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
93 |
> |
94 |
> [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs |
95 |
> 138357 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
96 |
> |
97 |
> [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs |
98 |
> 138358 - Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com> |
99 |
> |
100 |
> [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs |
101 |
> 138359 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
102 |
> |
103 |
> [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together |
104 |
> 138360 - Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> |
105 |
> |
106 |
> [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs |
107 |
> 138361 - Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> |
108 |
> |
109 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
110 |
> background |
111 |
> 138362 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
112 |
> |
113 |
> [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application |
114 |
> 138363 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
115 |
> |
116 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
117 |
> background |
118 |
> 138364 - Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> |
119 |
> |
120 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
121 |
> background |
122 |
> 138365 - Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
123 |
> |
124 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
125 |
> background |
126 |
> 138366 - walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |
127 |
> |
128 |
> [gentoo-user] gem install linecache19 fails |
129 |
> 138367 - 1126 <mailinglists@××××××××××××××××××.de> |
130 |
> |
131 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
132 |
> background |
133 |
> 138368 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
134 |
> |
135 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
136 |
> background |
137 |
> 138369 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
138 |
> |
139 |
> [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in |
140 |
> background |
141 |
> 138370 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> |
142 |
> |
143 |
> [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav |
144 |
> 138371 - john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk> |
145 |
> |
146 |
> [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav |
147 |
> 138372 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
148 |
> |
149 |
> [gentoo-user] In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop this? |
150 |
> 138373 - Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> |
151 |
> |
152 |
> [gentoo-user] In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop this? |
153 |
> 138374 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
154 |
> |
155 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop |
156 |
> this? |
157 |
> 138375 - walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |
158 |
> |
159 |
> [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together |
160 |
> 138376 - Urs Schutz <u.schutz@×××××××.ch> |
161 |
> |
162 |
> [gentoo-user] Re: In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop |
163 |
> this? |
164 |
> 138377 - "G.Wolfe Woodbury" <redwolfe@×××××.com> |
165 |
> |
166 |
> |
167 |
> |
168 |
> Alex Schuster writes: |
169 |
> |
170 |
> > I wrote: |
171 |
> |
172 |
> > > Thanks. Another thing that happens to me only. I filed a bug about |
173 |
> > > this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415241 |
174 |
> > |
175 |
> > I just found out it only happens when I start the video from within |
176 |
> > Dolphin, and as my user. From the command line, or as another user with |
177 |
> > an unconfigured KDE desktop, it does not happen. Something is very weird |
178 |
> > here. Maybe I should start over with a clean KDE environment, AGAIN. But |
179 |
> > I really really hate to do this every once in a while. Can't these |
180 |
> > things just work? |
181 |
> |
182 |
> The bug report got some updates, it's not Dolphin's or KDE's fault, but |
183 |
> mplayer2's, happens whenever it is started from a file manager. Something |
184 |
> with terminal keyboard controls enabled by the file manager, but with |
185 |
> stdin not being connected to anything readable. |
186 |
> |
187 |
> It's fixed upstream: http://devel.mplayer2.org/ticket/146 |
188 |
> Meanwhile, option -noconsolecontrols also helps. |
189 |
> |
190 |
> Wonko |
191 |
> |
192 |
> I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I can't seem to be able to get |
193 |
> tsocks, or proxychains working. |
194 |
> |
195 |
> I set up a socks server virtue of ssh dynamic port forwarding: |
196 |
> |
197 |
> $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12 |
198 |
> |
199 |
> Then I run: |
200 |
> |
201 |
> $ . tsocks on |
202 |
> $ tsocks sh |
203 |
> LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
204 |
> $ tsocks firefox |
205 |
> |
206 |
> or tsocks kmail, or tsocks <anything else>. |
207 |
> |
208 |
> The connection is not sent out via the server on 10.10.10.12. The terminal |
209 |
> that ran tsocks does not reveal anything in terms of a connection taking |
210 |
> place, at least not when I run firefox. With Chromium things are more |
211 |
> revealing: |
212 |
> |
213 |
> $ . tsocks on |
214 |
> $ tsocks sh |
215 |
> LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
216 |
> $ tsocks chromium |
217 |
> [4591:4604:405018909:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
218 |
> method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
219 |
> org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
220 |
> ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
221 |
> preloaded: ignored. |
222 |
> |
223 |
> |
224 |
> Exporting like this, also fails to load it for chromium: |
225 |
> |
226 |
> $ export LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libtsocks.so |
227 |
> $ tsocks sh |
228 |
> LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
229 |
> $ tsocks chromium |
230 |
> [5052:5065:973215173:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
231 |
> method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
232 |
> org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
233 |
> ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
234 |
> preloaded: ignored. |
235 |
> |
236 |
> |
237 |
> |
238 |
> If I set up socks within the firefox application Advanced/Network |
239 |
> settings, without using tsocks, the connection succeeds through the |
240 |
> ssh tunnel. Therefore I am confident that the tunnel itself is |
241 |
> working as a socks5 server. |
242 |
> |
243 |
> |
244 |
> This is what I have in /etc/socks/tsocks.conf |
245 |
> |
246 |
> server = 127.0.0.1 |
247 |
> server_type = 5 |
248 |
> server_port = 12465 |
249 |
> |
250 |
> Similarly, I get no connection if I use proxychains. |
251 |
> |
252 |
> Any idea what I am doing wrong here? |
253 |
> |
254 |
> -- |
255 |
> Regards, |
256 |
> Mick |
257 |
> |
258 |
> Thank you. It seems to be ok now |
259 |
> |
260 |
> [ebuild R ~] net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1 CURL_SSL="gnutls* -openssl*" |
261 |
> [ebuild R ~] net-libs/liboauth-0.9.6 USE="-curl*" |
262 |
> |
263 |
> >=net-misc/curl-7.24.0 -curl_ssl_nss -curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_gnutls ssl |
264 |
> -nss ssh |
265 |
> |
266 |
> |
267 |
> Laszlo |
268 |
> |
269 |
> |
270 |
> On 2012. máj. 14., hétfő, 17.34.19 CEST, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
271 |
> |
272 |
>> |
273 |
>> On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:02:15 +0200 |
274 |
>> Space Cake<spacecakex@×××××.com> wrote: |
275 |
>> |
276 |
>> |
277 |
>>> Removing keywords from curl produces this |
278 |
>>> |
279 |
>>> brutal keywords # emerge --keep-going -upND world |
280 |
>>> |
281 |
>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
282 |
>>> |
283 |
>>> Calculating dependencies... done! |
284 |
>>> |
285 |
>>> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy |
286 |
>>> "net-misc/curl[ssl,curl_ssl_**nss]". |
287 |
>>> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your |
288 |
>>> request: |
289 |
>>> - net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1::**gentoo (Change USE: +curl_ssl_nss, this |
290 |
>>> change violates use flag constraints defined by |
291 |
>>> net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1: 'threads? ( !ares ) ssl? ( exactly-one-of ( |
292 |
>>> curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl |
293 |
>>> curl_ssl_nss curl_ssl_polarssl ) )') |
294 |
>>> (dependency required by |
295 |
>>> "net-libs/liboauth-0.9.6[curl,**nss]" [installed]) (dependency required |
296 |
>>> by |
297 |
>>> "gnome-extra/evolution-data-**server-3.2.3-r1[gnome-online-**accounts]" |
298 |
>>> [installed]) |
299 |
>>> (dependency required by |
300 |
>>> "gnome-extra/gnome-contacts-3.**2.2" [installed]) (dependency required |
301 |
>>> by "@selected" [set]) (dependency required by "@world" [argument]) |
302 |
>>> |
303 |
>>> |
304 |
>>> eix output:[I] net-misc/curl |
305 |
>>> Available versions: 7.21.4 (~)7.21.6 (~)7.21.7 (~)7.21.7-r2 |
306 |
>>> (~)7.22.0 (~)7.23.1 7.24.0 (~)7.25.0 (~)7.25.0-r1 {ares |
307 |
>>> curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_nss |
308 |
>>> +curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_polarssl gnutls idn ipv6 kerberos ldap nss |
309 |
>>> ssh ssl static-libs test threads} |
310 |
>>> Installed versions: 7.25.0-r1(12.34.47 |
311 |
>>> 2012-05-14)(curl_ssl_openssl idn ipv6 ldap ssh ssl threads -ares |
312 |
>>> -curl_ssl_axtls -curl_ssl_cyassl -curl_ssl_gnutls -curl_ssl_nss |
313 |
>>> -curl_ssl_polarssl -kerberos -static-libs -test) |
314 |
>>> Homepage: http://curl.haxx.se/ |
315 |
>>> Description: A Client that groks URLs |
316 |
>>> |
317 |
>>> |
318 |
>>> So, this is asking for curl_ssl_nss, |
319 |
>>> |
320 |
>>> But after I set this I'm getting this |
321 |
>>> |
322 |
>>> brutal ~ # emerge --keep-going -upND world |
323 |
>>> |
324 |
>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
325 |
>>> |
326 |
>>> Calculating dependencies / |
327 |
>>> |
328 |
>>> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for net-misc/curl from @selected |
329 |
>>> ... done! |
330 |
>>> |
331 |
>>> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "net-misc/curl" has unmet |
332 |
>>> requirements. |
333 |
>>> - net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1::**gentoo USE="idn ipv6 ldap ssl threads |
334 |
>>> -ares -kerberos -ssh -static-libs -test" CURL_SSL="nss openssl -axtls |
335 |
>>> -cyassl -gnutls -polarssl" |
336 |
>>> |
337 |
>>> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: |
338 |
>>> ssl? ( exactly-one-of ( curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl |
339 |
>>> curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss curl_ssl_polarssl ) ) |
340 |
>>> |
341 |
>>> The above constraints are a subset of the following complete |
342 |
>>> expression: |
343 |
>>> threads? ( !ares ) ssl? ( exactly-one-of ( curl_ssl_axtls |
344 |
>>> curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss |
345 |
>>> curl_ssl_polarssl ) ) |
346 |
>>> |
347 |
>>> (dependency required by "@selected" [set]) |
348 |
>>> (dependency required by "@world" [argument]) |
349 |
>>> |
350 |
>>> |
351 |
>>> |
352 |
>>> |
353 |
>>> On 2012. máj. 14., hétfő, 15.08.17 CEST, walt wrote: |
354 |
>>> |
355 |
>>>> |
356 |
>>>> On 05/14/2012 03:49 AM, Space Cake wrote: |
357 |
>>>> |
358 |
>>>>> |
359 |
>>>>> Hi, |
360 |
>>>>> |
361 |
>>>>> For several weeks I'm trying to solve dependency issues with curl, |
362 |
>>>>> but I'm lost.. any idea? |
363 |
>>>>> |
364 |
>>>> |
365 |
>>>> |
366 |
>>>> That problem drove me nuts for months. I finally discovered by |
367 |
>>>> desperate trial and error that un-setting the 'curl' useflag fixes |
368 |
>>>> it. Finally! |
369 |
>>>> |
370 |
>>>> |
371 |
>>>> |
372 |
>>>> |
373 |
>>> |
374 |
>>> |
375 |
>> |
376 |
>> The requirements are (from the error message): |
377 |
>> |
378 |
>> If USE=ssl then use exactly one of the following: |
379 |
>> curl_ssl_axtls |
380 |
>> curl_ssl_cyassl |
381 |
>> curl_ssl_gnutls |
382 |
>> curl_ssl_openssl |
383 |
>> curl_ssl_nss |
384 |
>> curl_ssl_polarssl |
385 |
>> |
386 |
>> You have the following set for curl (per eix): |
387 |
>> |
388 |
>> curl_ssl_openssl |
389 |
>> |
390 |
>> But the error message also says that this is required: |
391 |
>> net-misc/curl[ssl,curl_ssl_**nss] by liboauth |
392 |
>> |
393 |
>> You cannot have curl_ssl_nss and curl_ssl_openssl both set for curl as |
394 |
>> liboauth complains |
395 |
>> |
396 |
>> So, what you need to do is set |
397 |
>> |
398 |
>> USE="-curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss" for curl |
399 |
>> |
400 |
>> If you read my post carefully and see how all the bits fit the output |
401 |
>> you supplied, it all makes sense. Portage output is not exactly |
402 |
>> intuitive but it can be understood. |
403 |
>> |
404 |
>> Or you could unset USE="curl" for liboauth. |
405 |
>> |
406 |
>> I don't know if you'll be willing to switch from curl_ssl just to make |
407 |
>> liboauth happy. That's your call. |
408 |
>> |
409 |
> |
410 |
> |
411 |
> Paul Hartman writes: |
412 |
> |
413 |
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |
414 |
> > wrote: |
415 |
> > > Finally, I found something. It's Dolphin! |
416 |
> [...] |
417 |
> > > Now, would this be an MPlayer problem, or one of Dolphin? |
418 |
> > |
419 |
> > I wonder if Dolphin is generating thumbnails/preview indexes at the |
420 |
> > same time you're trying to play, causing resource contention. |
421 |
> |
422 |
> Sometimes it does that, but that would happen when I play from the command |
423 |
> line, too. And now it even works from Dolphin, when it is set to open |
424 |
> mplayer in a terminal. So this cannot be the problem. And even if it |
425 |
> were, avoiding thumbnails would be a bad workaround only, such operations |
426 |
> should not affect video playback. |
427 |
> |
428 |
> Maybe this is somehow related to the other problem I had with mplayer2 |
429 |
> only, using 100% CPU when idle, only when started from a file manager. |
430 |
> |
431 |
> Wonko |
432 |
> |
433 |
> On 15.05.2012 11:11, Alex Schuster wrote: |
434 |
> > Stroller writes: |
435 |
> > |
436 |
> >> I boot from a SystemRescueCD and follow the Gentoo quick install guide. |
437 |
> >> |
438 |
> >> This has never failed me. |
439 |
> > |
440 |
> > For me it did, half a year ago, several packages failed to build due to |
441 |
> > strange libtool errors. It took me some days until I found the solution: |
442 |
> > unset path. |
443 |
> > |
444 |
> > Libtool uses this variable without unsetting it before, and |
445 |
> SystemRescueCD |
446 |
> > defines it as environment variable, which is still available in the |
447 |
> > chroot. This messed things up a lot. |
448 |
> > |
449 |
> > Apart from that, I really like SystemRescueCD. |
450 |
> > |
451 |
> > Wonko |
452 |
> > |
453 |
> |
454 |
> Did you do env-update && . /etc/profile after entering chroot? |
455 |
> I always thought that setting the right environment variables was the |
456 |
> purpose of that. |
457 |
> |
458 |
> I personally an Ubuntu-Live-Thumbdrive, because some time ago (2 years |
459 |
> or so) it wasn't possible to install gentoo with LUKS on a btrfs volume |
460 |
> from the gentoo minimal cd. |
461 |
> |
462 |
> The advantage of a live cd (especially for a beginner) is the |
463 |
> possibility to read the manual and google problems while installing. |
464 |
> Another possibility to do that would be an installation via ssh (works |
465 |
> nice too). |
466 |
> |
467 |
> |
468 |
> |
469 |
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:33:48AM -0700, felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
470 |
> > I have been using encfs to store most of my home dir for ages. I |
471 |
> rebooted Sunday morning (it's a ~amd64 system) to change kernel to 3.3.5 |
472 |
> from 3.3.4, and sometime overnight, after the nightly backups and mail |
473 |
> archives had run, the encfs mounted partition became read-only. I know the |
474 |
> timing only by the cron jobs; the nightly mail backup moves files from the |
475 |
> /home partition to the encfs partition, and it had not failed. I unmounted |
476 |
> the encfs partition, remounted, and it was read-only right from the get go. |
477 |
> |
478 |
> It's a failing disk drive: |
479 |
> |
480 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600747] hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { |
481 |
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error } |
482 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600759] hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { |
483 |
> UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=94761183, sector=94761183 |
484 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600788] hda: possibly failed opcode: 0x25 |
485 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600794] end_request: I/O error, dev hda, |
486 |
> sector 94761183 |
487 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600835] REISERFS error (device hda5): |
488 |
> vs-13070 reiserfs_read_locked_inode: i/o failure occurred trying to find |
489 |
> stat data of [2511 633054 0x0 SD] |
490 |
> May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600840] REISERFS (device hda5): |
491 |
> Remounting filesystem read-only |
492 |
> May 15 03:30:31 kernel: [80224.859713] hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { |
493 |
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error } |
494 |
> |
495 |
> > There are no errors in /var/log/messages of any sort since the 3.3.5 |
496 |
> boot. The mount command showed both the encfs partition and the underlying |
497 |
> regular partition as rw, not ro. |
498 |
> |
499 |
> I didn't see it the first time because I rebooted twice and only looked |
500 |
> since the second reboot, after spending a while googling for hints and |
501 |
> forgetting about the double reboot. |
502 |
> |
503 |
> -- |
504 |
> ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. |
505 |
> Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com |
506 |
> GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license |
507 |
> #4933 |
508 |
> I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of |
509 |
> room o |
510 |
> |
511 |
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100 |
512 |
> Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
513 |
> |
514 |
> > I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I can't seem to be able to |
515 |
> > get tsocks, or proxychains working. |
516 |
> > |
517 |
> > I set up a socks server virtue of ssh dynamic port forwarding: |
518 |
> > |
519 |
> > $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12 |
520 |
> |
521 |
> This part is fine. |
522 |
> |
523 |
> I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me. |
524 |
> |
525 |
> So what I do now is: |
526 |
> |
527 |
> Firefox + FoxyProxy |
528 |
> |
529 |
> and now I can set my proxy individually per site. All the internal work |
530 |
> stuff accessed from home goes through the proxy, except the three sites |
531 |
> only viewable from the outside; and everything else bypasses the proxy. |
532 |
> |
533 |
> Much better than trying to deal with a global proxy (although foxyproxy |
534 |
> will do that too if that is what you need. |
535 |
> |
536 |
> And dispense with all the tsocks stuff. |
537 |
> |
538 |
> I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new addition |
539 |
> so konqueror can also use it. |
540 |
> |
541 |
> |
542 |
> |
543 |
> |
544 |
> > |
545 |
> > Then I run: |
546 |
> > |
547 |
> > $ . tsocks on |
548 |
> > $ tsocks sh |
549 |
> > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
550 |
> > $ tsocks firefox |
551 |
> > |
552 |
> > or tsocks kmail, or tsocks <anything else>. |
553 |
> > |
554 |
> > The connection is not sent out via the server on 10.10.10.12. The |
555 |
> > terminal that ran tsocks does not reveal anything in terms of a |
556 |
> > connection taking place, at least not when I run firefox. With |
557 |
> > Chromium things are more revealing: |
558 |
> > |
559 |
> > $ . tsocks on |
560 |
> > $ tsocks sh |
561 |
> > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
562 |
> > $ tsocks chromium |
563 |
> > [4591:4604:405018909:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
564 |
> > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
565 |
> > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
566 |
> > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
567 |
> > preloaded: ignored. |
568 |
> > |
569 |
> > |
570 |
> > Exporting like this, also fails to load it for chromium: |
571 |
> > |
572 |
> > $ export LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libtsocks.so |
573 |
> > $ tsocks sh |
574 |
> > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so" |
575 |
> > $ tsocks chromium |
576 |
> > [5052:5065:973215173:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
577 |
> > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
578 |
> > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
579 |
> > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be |
580 |
> > preloaded: ignored. |
581 |
> > |
582 |
> > |
583 |
> > |
584 |
> > If I set up socks within the firefox application Advanced/Network |
585 |
> > settings, without using tsocks, the connection succeeds through the |
586 |
> > ssh tunnel. Therefore I am confident that the tunnel itself is |
587 |
> > working as a socks5 server. |
588 |
> > |
589 |
> > |
590 |
> > This is what I have in /etc/socks/tsocks.conf |
591 |
> > |
592 |
> > server = 127.0.0.1 |
593 |
> > server_type = 5 |
594 |
> > server_port = 12465 |
595 |
> > |
596 |
> > Similarly, I get no connection if I use proxychains. |
597 |
> > |
598 |
> > Any idea what I am doing wrong here? |
599 |
> > |
600 |
> |
601 |
> |
602 |
> |
603 |
> -- |
604 |
> Alan McKinnnon |
605 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
606 |
> |
607 |
> |
608 |
> On 15 May 2012 15:45, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
609 |
> > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100 |
610 |
> > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
611 |
> |
612 |
> >> $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12 |
613 |
> > |
614 |
> > This part is fine. |
615 |
> > |
616 |
> > I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me. |
617 |
> |
618 |
> Ah, thanks for this! It's reassuring to know that it's not just my |
619 |
> system. :-) |
620 |
> |
621 |
> |
622 |
> > So what I do now is: |
623 |
> > |
624 |
> > Firefox + FoxyProxy |
625 |
> |
626 |
> Firefox is less of a problem for me because I can set it up to |
627 |
> socksify everything. It is Kmail that I am mostly interested in. |
628 |
> |
629 |
> |
630 |
> > I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new addition |
631 |
> > so konqueror can also use it. |
632 |
> |
633 |
> Yes, but it does not work with the current stable kmail. The new |
634 |
> KDEPIM is such a nightmare I do not plan moving to it anytime soon. |
635 |
> It screwed up one box that I tried it on and that's enough for me. |
636 |
> :-( |
637 |
> |
638 |
> Did you have any success with proxychains? |
639 |
> |
640 |
> I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD error. |
641 |
> |
642 |
> |
643 |
> I also noticed that when I try to set up a proxy server in Chromium |
644 |
> using the 'under the bonnet' tab, I get this: |
645 |
> |
646 |
> "When running Chromium under a supported desktop environment, the |
647 |
> system proxy settings will be used. However, either your system is not |
648 |
> supported or there was a problem while launching your system |
649 |
> configuration. |
650 |
> |
651 |
> But you can still configure via the command line. Please see man |
652 |
> chromium-browser for more information on flags and environment |
653 |
> variables." |
654 |
> |
655 |
> Trying the command line did not fix it: |
656 |
> |
657 |
> [4742:4753:1575546819:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
658 |
> method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
659 |
> org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
660 |
> |
661 |
> That's what made me think that something on my system is not set up |
662 |
> properly. :-/ |
663 |
> |
664 |
> |
665 |
> These are the libtsocks.so files in my system: |
666 |
> |
667 |
> # ls -la /lib*/libtsocks.so |
668 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so -> libtsocks.so.1 |
669 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so -> |
670 |
> libtsocks.so.1 |
671 |
> |
672 |
> # ls -la /lib/libtsocks.so* |
673 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so -> |
674 |
> libtsocks.so.1 |
675 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1 -> |
676 |
> libtsocks.so.1.8 |
677 |
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 |
678 |
> |
679 |
> # ls -la /lib64/libtsocks.so* |
680 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so -> |
681 |
> libtsocks.so.1 |
682 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1 -> |
683 |
> libtsocks.so.1.8 |
684 |
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8 |
685 |
> |
686 |
> I can't see why it would not load it, unless it should be trying to |
687 |
> load the '/lib64/libtsocks.so' instead of the '/lib/libtsocks.so' on |
688 |
> an amd64 system? Shall I file a bug? |
689 |
> -- |
690 |
> Regards, |
691 |
> Mick |
692 |
> |
693 |
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:46:39 -0500 |
694 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
695 |
> |
696 |
> > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
697 |
> > > On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500 |
698 |
> > > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
699 |
> > > |
700 |
> > >> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top |
701 |
> > >> posters on this list. |
702 |
> > > |
703 |
> > > Yo Dale, |
704 |
> > > |
705 |
> > > You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-) |
706 |
> > > |
707 |
> > > I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says |
708 |
> > > Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me |
709 |
> > > this year |
710 |
> > > |
711 |
> > > [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it |
712 |
> > > |
713 |
> > > |
714 |
> > > |
715 |
> > |
716 |
> > |
717 |
> > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think: |
718 |
> > |
719 |
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml |
720 |
> > |
721 |
> > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho. |
722 |
> > Someone put alum in your water or something? |
723 |
> > |
724 |
> > ROFL |
725 |
> > |
726 |
> > Dale |
727 |
> > |
728 |
> > :-) :-) |
729 |
> > |
730 |
> |
731 |
> Would like to thank all guys and girls for posting. Even though I post |
732 |
> very little myself your posts are always excellent and there is plenty |
733 |
> to learn from just reading them. |
734 |
> |
735 |
> There are things I can do now which I never thought possible. Thanks |
736 |
> |
737 |
> -- |
738 |
> John D Maunder |
739 |
> |
740 |
> Dear all, |
741 |
> |
742 |
> It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I |
743 |
> could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is |
744 |
> that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and |
745 |
> this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use. |
746 |
> |
747 |
> The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise |
748 |
> heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech. |
749 |
> |
750 |
> I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident |
751 |
> when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise, |
752 |
> or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response |
753 |
> of the speakers. |
754 |
> |
755 |
> Does anybody have some similar issues? |
756 |
> |
757 |
> My current audio setup: |
758 |
> |
759 |
> * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well) |
760 |
> * MPD for music playing |
761 |
> * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving |
762 |
> features enabled. |
763 |
> |
764 |
> What I have tried to eliminate the noise: |
765 |
> |
766 |
> * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer |
767 |
> * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings. |
768 |
> |
769 |
> The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my |
770 |
> Alsamixer: |
771 |
> |
772 |
> * Master ~50 |
773 |
> * PCM 100 |
774 |
> * Headphone 100 |
775 |
> |
776 |
> Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this? |
777 |
> |
778 |
> Thanks a lot, |
779 |
> Ignas A. |
780 |
> |
781 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Ignas Anikevicius |
782 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
783 |
> > Dear all, |
784 |
> > |
785 |
> > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I |
786 |
> > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is |
787 |
> > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and |
788 |
> > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use. |
789 |
> > |
790 |
> > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise |
791 |
> > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech. |
792 |
> > |
793 |
> > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident |
794 |
> > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise, |
795 |
> > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response |
796 |
> > of the speakers. |
797 |
> > |
798 |
> > Does anybody have some similar issues? |
799 |
> > |
800 |
> > My current audio setup: |
801 |
> > |
802 |
> > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well) |
803 |
> > * MPD for music playing |
804 |
> > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving |
805 |
> > features enabled. |
806 |
> > |
807 |
> > What I have tried to eliminate the noise: |
808 |
> > |
809 |
> > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer |
810 |
> > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings. |
811 |
> > |
812 |
> > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my |
813 |
> > Alsamixer: |
814 |
> > |
815 |
> > * Master ~50 |
816 |
> > * PCM 100 |
817 |
> > * Headphone 100 |
818 |
> > |
819 |
> > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this? |
820 |
> > |
821 |
> > Thanks a lot, |
822 |
> > Ignas A. |
823 |
> > |
824 |
> |
825 |
> I would check the inputs in alsamixer and play around with them. I |
826 |
> had a problem similar to this for many months and it was due to some |
827 |
> funny input volume I didn't need, so I muted it. |
828 |
> |
829 |
> On 15/05/12 17:31, Alecks Gates wrote: |
830 |
> > I would check the inputs in alsamixer and play around with them. I |
831 |
> > had a problem similar to this for many months and it was due to some |
832 |
> > funny input volume I didn't need, so I muted it. |
833 |
> |
834 |
> Thanks for replying, I have muted everything, except Headphones, Master, |
835 |
> Speaker and PCM outputs, which *are* necessary to get any sound out of |
836 |
> my machine either with headphones or speakers. Muting speakers when only |
837 |
> headphones were used did not help. |
838 |
> |
839 |
> Cheers, |
840 |
> I. |
841 |
> |
842 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ignas Anikevicius |
843 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
844 |
> > Dear all, |
845 |
> > |
846 |
> > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I |
847 |
> > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is |
848 |
> > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and |
849 |
> > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use. |
850 |
> > |
851 |
> > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise |
852 |
> > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech. |
853 |
> > |
854 |
> > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident |
855 |
> > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise, |
856 |
> > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response |
857 |
> > of the speakers. |
858 |
> > |
859 |
> > Does anybody have some similar issues? |
860 |
> > |
861 |
> > My current audio setup: |
862 |
> > |
863 |
> > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well) |
864 |
> > * MPD for music playing |
865 |
> > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving |
866 |
> > features enabled. |
867 |
> > |
868 |
> > What I have tried to eliminate the noise: |
869 |
> > |
870 |
> > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer |
871 |
> > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings. |
872 |
> > |
873 |
> > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my |
874 |
> > Alsamixer: |
875 |
> > |
876 |
> > * Master ~50 |
877 |
> > * PCM 100 |
878 |
> > * Headphone 100 |
879 |
> > |
880 |
> > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this? |
881 |
> |
882 |
> I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system |
883 |
> electrical noise. |
884 |
> |
885 |
> What happens when you set: |
886 |
> |
887 |
> * Master -> 100 |
888 |
> * Headphone -> 100 |
889 |
> * Everything else -> 0 |
890 |
> |
891 |
> ...but you're not playing anything? If you hear anything, then what |
892 |
> you're hearing isn't something you can really deal with without using |
893 |
> an external sound card. Any USB sound card would do fine. (A pair of |
894 |
> 'gamer' headphones I bought at Best Buy advertised USB support...and |
895 |
> it turns out they were packaged with a tiny USB<->3.5mm sound |
896 |
> adapter.) |
897 |
> |
898 |
> If you don't hear the characteristic sound you're describing, then I'd |
899 |
> expect you're encountering clipping. That's when the logical amplitude |
900 |
> of a signal is greater than the medium holding it, and that happens a |
901 |
> *lot* with integer PCM mixing and amplification. |
902 |
> |
903 |
> Unfortunately, there's little to no standardization as to what '0' and |
904 |
> '100' mean between audio chipsets, so the best you can really do here |
905 |
> is crank all of your sliders to maximum, and decrease some of them |
906 |
> until you no longer hear the clipping. (And then remember which |
907 |
> positions on the relevant sliders that corresponds to; it usually |
908 |
> means you're getting no amplification, but also no attenuation.) |
909 |
> |
910 |
> -- |
911 |
> :wq |
912 |
> |
913 |
> Howdy, |
914 |
> |
915 |
> I could not resist this posting. |
916 |
> As many of you know, I've been a |
917 |
> real pain in the microprocessor lately.... |
918 |
> Particularly about Arm, A15 and Samsung. |
919 |
> |
920 |
> Well in keeping with that tradition, it seems |
921 |
> Samsung TV's are now supporting SSH into them |
922 |
> and directly and hacking the firmware: |
923 |
> |
924 |
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/samygo/ |
925 |
> |
926 |
> |
927 |
> Samsung is also very progressive on the A-15 |
928 |
> Arm development boards, which are sure to |
929 |
> create quite a stir when they are widely |
930 |
> available (soon I've heard): |
931 |
> |
932 |
> |
933 |
> http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/03/07/samsung-exynos-5250-dual-core-cortex-a15-and-gaia-smdk-development-board/#ixzz1p5yR3p7B |
934 |
> |
935 |
> |
936 |
> Samsung Galaxy Nexus cell-phone that runs SEandroid, natively: |
937 |
> |
938 |
> http://selinuxproject.org/page/SEAndroid |
939 |
> |
940 |
> Samsung is also moving aggresively to support |
941 |
> open source drivers for (ARM) graphics chips: |
942 |
> |
943 |
> |
944 |
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Open-source-driver-for-ARM-s-Mali-graphics-appears-1432447.html |
945 |
> |
946 |
> |
947 |
> ARM is preparing for domination and is looking rather cool these |
948 |
> days and Samsung is surely one of the most appealing |
949 |
> (ARM) vendors for the open source community. |
950 |
> |
951 |
> |
952 |
> enjoy, |
953 |
> James |
954 |
> |
955 |
> |
956 |
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
957 |
> > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
958 |
> >> On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500 |
959 |
> >> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
960 |
> >> |
961 |
> >>> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters |
962 |
> >>> on this list. |
963 |
> >> |
964 |
> >> Yo Dale, |
965 |
> >> |
966 |
> >> You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-) |
967 |
> >> |
968 |
> >> I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says |
969 |
> >> Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me |
970 |
> >> this year |
971 |
> >> |
972 |
> >> [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it |
973 |
> >> |
974 |
> >> |
975 |
> >> |
976 |
> > |
977 |
> > |
978 |
> > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think: |
979 |
> > |
980 |
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml |
981 |
> > |
982 |
> > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho. |
983 |
> > Someone put alum in your water or something? |
984 |
> > |
985 |
> > ROFL |
986 |
> > |
987 |
> > Dale |
988 |
> > |
989 |
> |
990 |
> Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people? |
991 |
> I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there |
992 |
> apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-) |
993 |
> |
994 |
> - Mark |
995 |
> |
996 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
997 |
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
998 |
> >> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
999 |
> >>> On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500 |
1000 |
> >>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
1001 |
> >>> |
1002 |
> >>>> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters |
1003 |
> >>>> on this list. |
1004 |
> >>> |
1005 |
> >>> Yo Dale, |
1006 |
> >>> |
1007 |
> >>> You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-) |
1008 |
> >>> |
1009 |
> >>> I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says |
1010 |
> >>> Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me |
1011 |
> >>> this year |
1012 |
> >>> |
1013 |
> >>> [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it |
1014 |
> >>> |
1015 |
> >>> |
1016 |
> >>> |
1017 |
> >> |
1018 |
> >> |
1019 |
> >> Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think: |
1020 |
> >> |
1021 |
> >> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml |
1022 |
> >> |
1023 |
> >> I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho. |
1024 |
> >> Someone put alum in your water or something? |
1025 |
> >> |
1026 |
> >> ROFL |
1027 |
> >> |
1028 |
> >> Dale |
1029 |
> >> |
1030 |
> > |
1031 |
> > Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people? |
1032 |
> > I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there |
1033 |
> > apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-) |
1034 |
> > |
1035 |
> > - Mark |
1036 |
> > |
1037 |
> > |
1038 |
> |
1039 |
> |
1040 |
> I'm wondering on this myself. Should I take more meds or are the meds |
1041 |
> causing it? < scratches head > |
1042 |
> |
1043 |
> o_O |
1044 |
> |
1045 |
> Dale |
1046 |
> |
1047 |
> :-) :-) |
1048 |
> |
1049 |
> -- |
1050 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
1051 |
> how you interpreted my words! |
1052 |
> |
1053 |
> Miss the compile output? Hint: |
1054 |
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
1055 |
> |
1056 |
> On 15/05/12 17:52, Michael Mol wrote: |
1057 |
> > I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system |
1058 |
> > electrical noise. |
1059 |
> > |
1060 |
> > What happens when you set: |
1061 |
> > |
1062 |
> > * Master -> 100 |
1063 |
> > * Headphone -> 100 |
1064 |
> > * Everything else -> 0 |
1065 |
> |
1066 |
> If I do not play anything while PCM is at 0 and Master and Headphone are |
1067 |
> at 100, then I do not hear anything. But if I start 'playing' something |
1068 |
> while still with PCM at 0 (no sound can be heard), then I start hearing |
1069 |
> irregular clipping sound. |
1070 |
> |
1071 |
> Is that what you expected? |
1072 |
> |
1073 |
> If I decrease the sound to a level where I stop hearing clipping, then I |
1074 |
> can barely hear the music. Although the same headphones play on my |
1075 |
> player fine. |
1076 |
> |
1077 |
> And It's a shame, that I indeed hear clipping. Are there any ways to |
1078 |
> increase the sound volume without increasing the mixer setting in ALSA? |
1079 |
> Would a different sound card help? Is there any way I can solve the |
1080 |
> problem without buying new hardware? |
1081 |
> |
1082 |
> Thanks a lot for help, |
1083 |
> I. |
1084 |
> |
1085 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ignas Anikevicius |
1086 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
1087 |
> > On 15/05/12 17:52, Michael Mol wrote: |
1088 |
> >> I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system |
1089 |
> >> electrical noise. |
1090 |
> >> |
1091 |
> >> What happens when you set: |
1092 |
> >> |
1093 |
> >> * Master -> 100 |
1094 |
> >> * Headphone -> 100 |
1095 |
> >> * Everything else -> 0 |
1096 |
> > |
1097 |
> > If I do not play anything while PCM is at 0 and Master and Headphone are |
1098 |
> > at 100, then I do not hear anything. But if I start 'playing' something |
1099 |
> > while still with PCM at 0 (no sound can be heard), then I start hearing |
1100 |
> > irregular clipping sound. |
1101 |
> > |
1102 |
> > Is that what you expected? |
1103 |
> > |
1104 |
> > If I decrease the sound to a level where I stop hearing clipping, then I |
1105 |
> > can barely hear the music. Although the same headphones play on my |
1106 |
> > player fine. |
1107 |
> > |
1108 |
> > And It's a shame, that I indeed hear clipping. Are there any ways to |
1109 |
> > increase the sound volume without increasing the mixer setting in ALSA? |
1110 |
> |
1111 |
> There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback |
1112 |
> volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess |
1113 |
> which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my |
1114 |
> old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing |
1115 |
> sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk. |
1116 |
> |
1117 |
> Each one of those will likely have a threshold where you'll risk |
1118 |
> clipping if you go above it. I.e. if PCM and Headphone are at 50, but |
1119 |
> Master is above $master_threshold, you may hear clipping. Likewise, if |
1120 |
> Master and Headphone are at 50, but PCM is above $pcm_threshold, you |
1121 |
> may hear clipping. Similarly, 'Headphone'... |
1122 |
> |
1123 |
> There is probably a combination of settings which works best, and |
1124 |
> sounds fine. The trouble, of course, is finding the maximum safe |
1125 |
> threshold for each. |
1126 |
> |
1127 |
> Me, I'm fortunate; my Intel-HDA-compatible cards all tend to say |
1128 |
> things like "-5dB" or "+20dB" when I'm using the console Alsamixer, |
1129 |
> and I've established that as long as they say "0dB", I get the best |
1130 |
> signal I can get. |
1131 |
> |
1132 |
> > Would a different sound card help? |
1133 |
> |
1134 |
> Sure; you could use a card with more post-mixer amplification. Or a |
1135 |
> card with little to no mixing options. Or an external amplifier. |
1136 |
> |
1137 |
> > Is there any way I can solve the |
1138 |
> > problem without buying new hardware? |
1139 |
> |
1140 |
> You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing |
1141 |
> internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to |
1142 |
> 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been |
1143 |
> positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting |
1144 |
> applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting |
1145 |
> direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But |
1146 |
> "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well |
1147 |
> for the majority of circumstances. |
1148 |
> |
1149 |
> > |
1150 |
> > Thanks a lot for help, |
1151 |
> |
1152 |
> np. |
1153 |
> |
1154 |
> (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got |
1155 |
> sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list |
1156 |
> keeps the archives useful.) |
1157 |
> |
1158 |
> -- |
1159 |
> :wq |
1160 |
> |
1161 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Ignas Anikevicius |
1162 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
1163 |
> > Dear all, |
1164 |
> > |
1165 |
> > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I |
1166 |
> > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is |
1167 |
> > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and |
1168 |
> > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use. |
1169 |
> > |
1170 |
> > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise |
1171 |
> > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech. |
1172 |
> > |
1173 |
> > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident |
1174 |
> > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise, |
1175 |
> > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response |
1176 |
> > of the speakers. |
1177 |
> > |
1178 |
> > Does anybody have some similar issues? |
1179 |
> > |
1180 |
> > My current audio setup: |
1181 |
> > |
1182 |
> > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well) |
1183 |
> > * MPD for music playing |
1184 |
> > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving |
1185 |
> > features enabled. |
1186 |
> > |
1187 |
> > What I have tried to eliminate the noise: |
1188 |
> > |
1189 |
> > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer |
1190 |
> > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings. |
1191 |
> > |
1192 |
> > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my |
1193 |
> > Alsamixer: |
1194 |
> > |
1195 |
> > * Master ~50 |
1196 |
> > * PCM 100 |
1197 |
> > * Headphone 100 |
1198 |
> > |
1199 |
> > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this? |
1200 |
> > |
1201 |
> > Thanks a lot, |
1202 |
> > Ignas A. |
1203 |
> > |
1204 |
> |
1205 |
> Hi Ignas, |
1206 |
> I've never used pulse-audio so I cannot help with that, but with |
1207 |
> plain Alsa I had a similar (but not identical) problem recently. In my |
1208 |
> case the distorted sound was primarily from my microphone and not, as |
1209 |
> I remember it, from playback. Turned out it was a control I hadn't |
1210 |
> looked at before called 'Digital' which apparently mixes audio in the |
1211 |
> sound chip and for whatever reason was very dirty sounding on the mic |
1212 |
> side. |
1213 |
> |
1214 |
> Note that my audio is not Conextent but rather something called |
1215 |
> SupremeFX X-Fi (Creative Labs maybe?) so your results will almost |
1216 |
> certainly vary. A little machine info is below. |
1217 |
> |
1218 |
> Good luck, |
1219 |
> Mark |
1220 |
> |
1221 |
> c2stable ~ # lspci | grep Audio |
1222 |
> 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD |
1223 |
> Audio Controller |
1224 |
> 02:00.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation GF100 High Definition Audio |
1225 |
> Controller (rev a1) |
1226 |
> 04:00.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation High Definition Audio |
1227 |
> Controller (rev a1) |
1228 |
> c2stable ~ # |
1229 |
> |
1230 |
> c2stable ~ # lsmod |
1231 |
> Module Size Used by |
1232 |
> vmnet 32295 15 |
1233 |
> vmblock 9667 0 |
1234 |
> vsock 35510 2 |
1235 |
> vmci 55922 2 vsock |
1236 |
> vmmon 56524 5 |
1237 |
> vboxnetadp 4720 0 |
1238 |
> vboxnetflt 13187 0 |
1239 |
> vboxdrv 1760740 3 vboxnetadp,vboxnetflt |
1240 |
> nvidia 12297407 104 |
1241 |
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi 22531 8 |
1242 |
> snd_hda_codec_analog 80332 1 |
1243 |
> sky2 42693 0 |
1244 |
> i2c_i801 7674 0 |
1245 |
> snd_hda_intel 21907 17 |
1246 |
> snd_hda_codec 73637 3 |
1247 |
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel |
1248 |
> snd_hwdep 5508 1 snd_hda_codec |
1249 |
> snd_pcm 74632 7 |
1250 |
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec |
1251 |
> snd_timer 18381 5 snd_pcm |
1252 |
> snd 58592 33 |
1253 |
> |
1254 |
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer |
1255 |
> soundcore 6750 1 snd |
1256 |
> snd_page_alloc 7340 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm |
1257 |
> agpgart 31204 1 nvidia |
1258 |
> c2stable ~ # |
1259 |
> |
1260 |
> On 15/05/12 20:08, Michael Mol wrote: |
1261 |
> > There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback |
1262 |
> > volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess |
1263 |
> > which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my |
1264 |
> > old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing |
1265 |
> > sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk. |
1266 |
> |
1267 |
> [...] (some useful stuff snipped :)) |
1268 |
> |
1269 |
> At the moment all the other sliders are at 0. So I do not know, maybe |
1270 |
> some other sliders are doing this... |
1271 |
> |
1272 |
> Also, ALSA can show the levels in dBs for my card... but I get sand even |
1273 |
> when I'am at gain of ~ (-11,-14)dB on all three sliders (Master, PCM, |
1274 |
> Headphone). |
1275 |
> |
1276 |
> > You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing |
1277 |
> > internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to |
1278 |
> > 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been |
1279 |
> > positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting |
1280 |
> > applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting |
1281 |
> > direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But |
1282 |
> > "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well |
1283 |
> > for the majority of circumstances. |
1284 |
> |
1285 |
> I am using Pulse :)... The problem with I have that it changes my PCM |
1286 |
> and Headphone levels without asking me... Therefore, if I change the |
1287 |
> levels manually on alsamixer and then use Pavucontrol, it just changes |
1288 |
> the PCM and headphone or speaker levels to max, which makes the sound |
1289 |
> crappy. Otherwise I am quite a happy Pulse user. :) |
1290 |
> |
1291 |
> Is there a way to set the limiting thresholds? Or maybe I am using two |
1292 |
> things at the same (ALSA and Pulse) and they are clashing and, |
1293 |
> therefore, I can not get good quality sound? |
1294 |
> |
1295 |
> >> Thanks a lot for help, |
1296 |
> > |
1297 |
> > np. |
1298 |
> > |
1299 |
> > (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got |
1300 |
> > sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list |
1301 |
> > keeps the archives useful.) |
1302 |
> |
1303 |
> I thought, that I have replied to both, list and you.. :) Well, thanks |
1304 |
> for that. :) |
1305 |
> |
1306 |
> Cheers, |
1307 |
> I. |
1308 |
> |
1309 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Ignas Anikevicius |
1310 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
1311 |
> > On 15/05/12 20:08, Michael Mol wrote: |
1312 |
> >> There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback |
1313 |
> >> volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess |
1314 |
> >> which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my |
1315 |
> >> old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing |
1316 |
> >> sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk. |
1317 |
> > |
1318 |
> > [...] (some useful stuff snipped :)) |
1319 |
> > |
1320 |
> > At the moment all the other sliders are at 0. So I do not know, maybe |
1321 |
> > some other sliders are doing this... |
1322 |
> |
1323 |
> Not if they're at their minimum settings. :-| |
1324 |
> |
1325 |
> > |
1326 |
> > Also, ALSA can show the levels in dBs for my card... but I get sand even |
1327 |
> > when I'am at gain of ~ (-11,-14)dB on all three sliders (Master, PCM, |
1328 |
> > Headphone). |
1329 |
> > |
1330 |
> >> You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing |
1331 |
> >> internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to |
1332 |
> >> 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been |
1333 |
> >> positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting |
1334 |
> >> applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting |
1335 |
> >> direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But |
1336 |
> >> "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well |
1337 |
> >> for the majority of circumstances. |
1338 |
> > |
1339 |
> > I am using Pulse :)... The problem with I have that it changes my PCM |
1340 |
> > and Headphone levels without asking me... Therefore, if I change the |
1341 |
> > levels manually on alsamixer and then use Pavucontrol, it just changes |
1342 |
> > the PCM and headphone or speaker levels to max, which makes the sound |
1343 |
> > crappy. Otherwise I am quite a happy Pulse user. :) |
1344 |
> |
1345 |
> Run alsamixer in a terminal while playing with pavucontrol; you'll see |
1346 |
> Alsamixer update live while Pulse tweaks ALSA's mixer settings. It's |
1347 |
> useful if you want to get a feel for what exactly Pulse is doing. |
1348 |
> |
1349 |
> On my desktop system, I found that if I had the Pulse master volume |
1350 |
> control set to about 70%, Pulse would have my various sliders set to |
1351 |
> just about their maximum setting before I started getting clipping |
1352 |
> noises. |
1353 |
> > |
1354 |
> > Is there a way to set the limiting thresholds? |
1355 |
> |
1356 |
> No; the limiting thresholds I was describing are some value that just |
1357 |
> happens to be what it is because of the way your sound card mixes |
1358 |
> audio together. |
1359 |
> |
1360 |
> > Or maybe I am using two |
1361 |
> > things at the same (ALSA and Pulse) and they are clashing and, |
1362 |
> > therefore, I can not get good quality sound? |
1363 |
> |
1364 |
> Pulse is usually OK at managing ALSA in the background; you just have |
1365 |
> to do all your volume tweaking through pavucontrol if you intend for |
1366 |
> things to not change on you. |
1367 |
> |
1368 |
> [snip] |
1369 |
> |
1370 |
> >> (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got |
1371 |
> >> sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list |
1372 |
> >> keeps the archives useful.) |
1373 |
> > |
1374 |
> > I thought, that I have replied to both, list and you.. :) Well, thanks |
1375 |
> > for that. :) |
1376 |
> |
1377 |
> Might have been a quirk in my GMail interface, now that I look at it. |
1378 |
> Your earlier email looks fine. Something about the list's distribution |
1379 |
> pattern changed, so simply clicking "Reply" doesn't work; I now have |
1380 |
> to click "Reply All". |
1381 |
> |
1382 |
> Anyway, I'd try taking others' suggestions, too, and possibly poking |
1383 |
> whatever PulseAudio support groups exist. They'll be interested in |
1384 |
> your circumstance. If it's possible to use Pulse reasonably on your |
1385 |
> hardware, they'll want to figure out how to make that less difficult |
1386 |
> to do. |
1387 |
> |
1388 |
> Also, Mark noted that there were sliders he hadn't tweaked before when |
1389 |
> he was experiencing similar issues, and it's plausible Pulse isn't |
1390 |
> poking those at all. Try watching alsamixer to see what Pulse is up |
1391 |
> to, and see if Pulse is passing over some of those sliders. |
1392 |
> |
1393 |
> -- |
1394 |
> :wq |
1395 |
> |
1396 |
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:26 +0100 |
1397 |
> Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
1398 |
> |
1399 |
> > On 15 May 2012 15:45, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
1400 |
> > > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100 |
1401 |
> > > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
1402 |
> > |
1403 |
> > >> $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12 |
1404 |
> > > |
1405 |
> > > This part is fine. |
1406 |
> > > |
1407 |
> > > I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me. |
1408 |
> > |
1409 |
> > Ah, thanks for this! It's reassuring to know that it's not just my |
1410 |
> > system. :-) |
1411 |
> > |
1412 |
> > |
1413 |
> > > So what I do now is: |
1414 |
> > > |
1415 |
> > > Firefox + FoxyProxy |
1416 |
> > |
1417 |
> > Firefox is less of a problem for me because I can set it up to |
1418 |
> > socksify everything. It is Kmail that I am mostly interested in. |
1419 |
> > |
1420 |
> > |
1421 |
> > > I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new |
1422 |
> > > addition so konqueror can also use it. |
1423 |
> > |
1424 |
> > Yes, but it does not work with the current stable kmail. The new |
1425 |
> > KDEPIM is such a nightmare I do not plan moving to it anytime soon. |
1426 |
> > It screwed up one box that I tried it on and that's enough for me. |
1427 |
> > :-( |
1428 |
> > |
1429 |
> > Did you have any success with proxychains? |
1430 |
> > |
1431 |
> > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD |
1432 |
> > error. |
1433 |
> |
1434 |
> It almost certainly is, tsocks uses LD_PRELOAD to mangle it's magic so |
1435 |
> that stuff works. I believe chromium has severe issues with tsocks |
1436 |
> because of how it does it's sandboxing, but I honestly don't know how |
1437 |
> to get around that. |
1438 |
> |
1439 |
> On a properly setup Gentoo amd64 system, /lib is a link to /lib64, so |
1440 |
> the error you get is not a path error, the chromium binary really |
1441 |
> cannot (or will not) deal with tsocks.so |
1442 |
> |
1443 |
> I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly |
1444 |
> think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug. |
1445 |
> |
1446 |
> Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to |
1447 |
> say? |
1448 |
> |
1449 |
> |
1450 |
> |
1451 |
> > |
1452 |
> > |
1453 |
> > I also noticed that when I try to set up a proxy server in Chromium |
1454 |
> > using the 'under the bonnet' tab, I get this: |
1455 |
> > |
1456 |
> > "When running Chromium under a supported desktop environment, the |
1457 |
> > system proxy settings will be used. However, either your system is not |
1458 |
> > supported or there was a problem while launching your system |
1459 |
> > configuration. |
1460 |
> > |
1461 |
> > But you can still configure via the command line. Please see man |
1462 |
> > chromium-browser for more information on flags and environment |
1463 |
> > variables." |
1464 |
> > |
1465 |
> > Trying the command line did not fix it: |
1466 |
> > |
1467 |
> > [4742:4753:1575546819:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
1468 |
> > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
1469 |
> > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
1470 |
> > |
1471 |
> > That's what made me think that something on my system is not set up |
1472 |
> > properly. :-/ |
1473 |
> > |
1474 |
> > |
1475 |
> > These are the libtsocks.so files in my system: |
1476 |
> > |
1477 |
> > # ls -la /lib*/libtsocks.so |
1478 |
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so -> |
1479 |
> > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 |
1480 |
> > 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so -> libtsocks.so.1 |
1481 |
> > |
1482 |
> > # ls -la /lib/libtsocks.so* |
1483 |
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so -> |
1484 |
> > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 |
1485 |
> > 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1 -> libtsocks.so.1.8 |
1486 |
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 |
1487 |
> > |
1488 |
> > # ls -la /lib64/libtsocks.so* |
1489 |
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so -> |
1490 |
> > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 |
1491 |
> > 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1 -> libtsocks.so.1.8 |
1492 |
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8 |
1493 |
> > |
1494 |
> > I can't see why it would not load it, unless it should be trying to |
1495 |
> > load the '/lib64/libtsocks.so' instead of the '/lib/libtsocks.so' on |
1496 |
> > an amd64 system? Shall I file a bug? |
1497 |
> |
1498 |
> |
1499 |
> |
1500 |
> -- |
1501 |
> Alan McKinnnon |
1502 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
1503 |
> |
1504 |
> |
1505 |
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:01:00 -0700 |
1506 |
> Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
1507 |
> |
1508 |
> > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think: |
1509 |
> > > |
1510 |
> > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml |
1511 |
> > > |
1512 |
> > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit |
1513 |
> > > tho. Someone put alum in your water or something? |
1514 |
> > > |
1515 |
> > > ROFL |
1516 |
> > > |
1517 |
> > > Dale |
1518 |
> > > |
1519 |
> > |
1520 |
> > Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people? |
1521 |
> > I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there |
1522 |
> > apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-) |
1523 |
> |
1524 |
> This gentoo stuff is addictive :-) |
1525 |
> |
1526 |
> Must be the personalities around here. I reckon that anyone who sticks |
1527 |
> around here and becomes a regular (regardless of their skill level) has |
1528 |
> something special going on inside. |
1529 |
> |
1530 |
> Gentoo-ers all have that DIY attitude, as if they would rather not wait |
1531 |
> around for someone else to do all their lifting for them. |
1532 |
> |
1533 |
> |
1534 |
> -- |
1535 |
> Alan McKinnnon |
1536 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
1537 |
> |
1538 |
> |
1539 |
> Hinnerk van Bruinehsen writes: |
1540 |
> |
1541 |
> > On 15.05.2012 11:11, Alex Schuster wrote: |
1542 |
> >> Stroller writes: |
1543 |
> >> |
1544 |
> >>> I boot from a SystemRescueCD and follow the Gentoo quick install guide. |
1545 |
> >>> |
1546 |
> >>> This has never failed me. |
1547 |
> >> |
1548 |
> >> For me it did, half a year ago, several packages failed to build due to |
1549 |
> >> strange libtool errors. It took me some days until I found the solution: |
1550 |
> >> unset path. |
1551 |
> >> |
1552 |
> >> Libtool uses this variable without unsetting it before, and |
1553 |
> SystemRescueCD |
1554 |
> >> defines it as environment variable, which is still available in the |
1555 |
> >> chroot. This messed things up a lot. |
1556 |
> [...] |
1557 |
> > Did you do env-update && . /etc/profile after entering chroot? |
1558 |
> > I always thought that setting the right environment variables was the |
1559 |
> > purpose of that. |
1560 |
> |
1561 |
> Sure. But this only _sets_ some environment variables - it does not |
1562 |
> unset any other variables you already have defined. |
1563 |
> |
1564 |
> The error is in libtool - it uses a variable without unsetting it first. |
1565 |
> |
1566 |
> Wonko |
1567 |
> |
1568 |
> On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote: |
1569 |
> > On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:26 +0100 |
1570 |
> > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
1571 |
> |
1572 |
> > > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD |
1573 |
> > > error. |
1574 |
> > |
1575 |
> > It almost certainly is, tsocks uses LD_PRELOAD to mangle it's magic so |
1576 |
> > that stuff works. I believe chromium has severe issues with tsocks |
1577 |
> > because of how it does it's sandboxing, but I honestly don't know how |
1578 |
> > to get around that. |
1579 |
> > |
1580 |
> > On a properly setup Gentoo amd64 system, /lib is a link to /lib64, so |
1581 |
> > the error you get is not a path error, the chromium binary really |
1582 |
> > cannot (or will not) deal with tsocks.so |
1583 |
> > |
1584 |
> > I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly |
1585 |
> > think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug. |
1586 |
> > |
1587 |
> > Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to |
1588 |
> > say? |
1589 |
> |
1590 |
> I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it is |
1591 |
> supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when called |
1592 |
> with tsocks). I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at |
1593 |
> all. |
1594 |
> |
1595 |
> The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely |
1596 |
> ignore |
1597 |
> it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up. |
1598 |
> Is |
1599 |
> there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail? |
1600 |
> -- |
1601 |
> Regards, |
1602 |
> Mick |
1603 |
> |
1604 |
> On Tuesday 15 May 2012 18:25:57 john wrote: |
1605 |
> |
1606 |
> > Would like to thank all guys and girls for posting. Even though I |
1607 |
> > post very little myself your posts are always excellent and there is |
1608 |
> > plenty to learn from just reading them. |
1609 |
> > |
1610 |
> > There are things I can do now which I never thought possible. Thanks |
1611 |
> |
1612 |
> Is this one case in which a me-too message is acceptable? Anyway, I |
1613 |
> second John's gratitude to you all. |
1614 |
> |
1615 |
> -- |
1616 |
> Rgds |
1617 |
> Peter |
1618 |
> |
1619 |
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:50:33 -0400 |
1620 |
> Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
1621 |
> |
1622 |
> > I tried Hugin, but got nowhere. I set 6 points on each |
1623 |
> > picture, which are 2 overlapping parts of a single |
1624 |
> > original negative, but all it offered was a black screen; |
1625 |
> > I did follow the on-line help. |
1626 |
> > |
1627 |
> > Then I tried Imagemagick & got a good result after a bit |
1628 |
> > of fussing. The commands I used were |
1629 |
> > |
1630 |
> > convert -size 1000x760 canvas:black brum-canvas.jpg |
1631 |
> > composite -geometry +0+0 brum-3070.jpg brum-canvas.jpg |
1632 |
> > brum-1.jpg composite -geometry +220-8 brum-3068.jpg |
1633 |
> > brum-1.jpg brum-2.jpg |
1634 |
> > |
1635 |
> > You can see the images at |
1636 |
> > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/ : they are of |
1637 |
> > trams in Colmore Row, Birmingham in May 1953 . |
1638 |
> > |
1639 |
> > I still need to light/darken 1 image a bit to hide the |
1640 |
> > join, but as a proof of concept this shows it's feasible |
1641 |
> > with Imagemagick. |
1642 |
> > |
1643 |
> > Any further advice re Hugin is welcome: can anyone do it |
1644 |
> > with these photos ? |
1645 |
> > |
1646 |
> |
1647 |
> I just tried with fotoxx: This is a semi-manual process, but |
1648 |
> I liked the resulting image. The joint is less visible |
1649 |
> than on brum-2.jpg. It was easy to do an "unbend" after |
1650 |
> merging, and therefore the clock and the face on the image |
1651 |
> borders stay in the image. This was my first try to do a |
1652 |
> panorama in fotoxx, and it took me less than 5 minutes, |
1653 |
> much faster than with hugin. If you like I send you the |
1654 |
> image to your private mail. |
1655 |
> |
1656 |
> Urs |
1657 |
> |
1658 |
> 120515 Urs Schutz wrote: |
1659 |
> > I just tried with fotoxx. |
1660 |
> |
1661 |
> I hadn't heard of that one : there are so many pkgs in media/gfx |
1662 |
> that it's difficult to be sure I've checked all photo editors. |
1663 |
> |
1664 |
> > This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the resulting image. |
1665 |
> |
1666 |
> It c~b any more manual than Imagemagick (smile). |
1667 |
> |
1668 |
> > The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg. |
1669 |
> |
1670 |
> That wb useful : no doubt, I could adjust one of them with Imagemagick, |
1671 |
> but eventually there wb >= 100 similar merges to do, |
1672 |
> so some degree of automation wb very helpful. |
1673 |
> |
1674 |
> > It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging |
1675 |
> > and therefore the clock and the face on the image borders stay in the |
1676 |
> image. |
1677 |
> |
1678 |
> Not a problem with Imagemagick. |
1679 |
> |
1680 |
> > This was my first try to do a panorama in fotoxx |
1681 |
> > and it took me less than 5 minutes, much faster than with hugin. |
1682 |
> > If you like I send you the image to your private mail. |
1683 |
> |
1684 |
> Please do & thanks for this info. |
1685 |
> |
1686 |
> Does anyone else have suggestions re pkgs or methods ? |
1687 |
> -- it does look as if this rather simple task is fairly challenging, |
1688 |
> so others may benefit if it's on record here. |
1689 |
> |
1690 |
> I have emerged Gimp & will look at what it can do soon : |
1691 |
> it has 'layers', which look like what is needed. |
1692 |
> |
1693 |
> -- |
1694 |
> ========================,,============================================ |
1695 |
> SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
1696 |
> ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
1697 |
> TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
1698 |
> |
1699 |
> |
1700 |
> |
1701 |
> On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
1702 |
> > |
1703 |
> > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think: |
1704 |
> > |
1705 |
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml |
1706 |
> > |
1707 |
> > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho. |
1708 |
> > Someone put alum in your water or something? |
1709 |
> > |
1710 |
> |
1711 |
> I blabbed that much?? |
1712 |
> |
1713 |
> Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads related to CUPS, |
1714 |
> KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and still end up in the top 5?? |
1715 |
> o_O |
1716 |
> |
1717 |
> Rgds, |
1718 |
> |
1719 |
> Hi, |
1720 |
> |
1721 |
> I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm |
1722 |
> following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start |
1723 |
> which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go. |
1724 |
> |
1725 |
> However... two different questions: |
1726 |
> |
1727 |
> When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon |
1728 |
> rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux |
1729 |
> /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run |
1730 |
> grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux |
1731 |
> image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather |
1732 |
> grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or |
1733 |
> what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within |
1734 |
> a chroot? |
1735 |
> |
1736 |
> Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo |
1737 |
> system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of |
1738 |
> /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs. I |
1739 |
> must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will work. Is |
1740 |
> there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For now I have |
1741 |
> simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but I'm curious to |
1742 |
> know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own somehow. |
1743 |
> |
1744 |
> Thanks, |
1745 |
> Paul |
1746 |
> |
1747 |
> On 15 May 2012 19:37, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
1748 |
> > Hi, |
1749 |
> > |
1750 |
> > I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm |
1751 |
> > following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start |
1752 |
> > which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go. |
1753 |
> > |
1754 |
> > However... two different questions: |
1755 |
> > |
1756 |
> > When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon |
1757 |
> > rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux |
1758 |
> > /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run |
1759 |
> > grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux |
1760 |
> > image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather |
1761 |
> > grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or |
1762 |
> > what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within |
1763 |
> > a chroot? |
1764 |
> |
1765 |
> I don't really understand where the chroot comes into this but ... did |
1766 |
> you add the "-o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" part? I forgot that bit a few |
1767 |
> times and then couldn't figure out why my changes weren't taking |
1768 |
> effect. :-) |
1769 |
> |
1770 |
> > Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo |
1771 |
> > system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of |
1772 |
> > /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs. I |
1773 |
> > must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will work. Is |
1774 |
> > there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For now I have |
1775 |
> > simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but I'm curious to |
1776 |
> > know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own somehow. |
1777 |
> > |
1778 |
> > Thanks, |
1779 |
> > Paul |
1780 |
> > |
1781 |
> |
1782 |
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Hilco Wijbenga |
1783 |
> <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com> wrote: |
1784 |
> > On 15 May 2012 19:37, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
1785 |
> wrote: |
1786 |
> >> Hi, |
1787 |
> >> |
1788 |
> >> I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm |
1789 |
> >> following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start |
1790 |
> >> which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go. |
1791 |
> >> |
1792 |
> >> However... two different questions: |
1793 |
> >> |
1794 |
> >> When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon |
1795 |
> >> rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux |
1796 |
> >> /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run |
1797 |
> >> grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux |
1798 |
> >> image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather |
1799 |
> >> grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or |
1800 |
> >> what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within |
1801 |
> >> a chroot? |
1802 |
> > |
1803 |
> > I don't really understand where the chroot comes into this but ... did |
1804 |
> > you add the "-o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" part? I forgot that bit a few |
1805 |
> > times and then couldn't figure out why my changes weren't taking |
1806 |
> > effect. :-) |
1807 |
> |
1808 |
> Hehe, yeah, I used that command. I'm installing it from chroot for the |
1809 |
> first time because gentoo's bootloader was not yet present on the |
1810 |
> machine (only Windows7). |
1811 |
> |
1812 |
> 120515 Philip Webb wrote: |
1813 |
> > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote: |
1814 |
> >> I just tried with fotoxx. |
1815 |
> >> This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the resulting image. |
1816 |
> |
1817 |
> I've installed Fotoxx & it does a very good job ! |
1818 |
> |
1819 |
> >> The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg. |
1820 |
> |
1821 |
> There's no sign of it on my version : |
1822 |
> http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/brum-3.jpg |
1823 |
> |
1824 |
> >> It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging |
1825 |
> >> and therefore the clock and the face on the image borders stay in the |
1826 |
> image. |
1827 |
> |
1828 |
> They're on my image, but I can't find out how to turn it into a rectangle. |
1829 |
> NB there are noticeable curves at the R-hand edge not in the original: |
1830 |
> look at the sidewalk curve & at the building pediment. |
1831 |
> Any suggestions ? -- otherwise, this looks like the tool to use. |
1832 |
> |
1833 |
> -- |
1834 |
> ========================,,============================================ |
1835 |
> SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
1836 |
> ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
1837 |
> TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
1838 |
> |
1839 |
> |
1840 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
1841 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
1842 |
> |
1843 |
> On 16.05.2012 04:37, Paul Hartman wrote: |
1844 |
> > Hi, |
1845 |
> > |
1846 |
> > I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm |
1847 |
> > following the guide at: |
1848 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start which seems easy |
1849 |
> > enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go. |
1850 |
> > |
1851 |
> > However... two different questions: |
1852 |
> > |
1853 |
> > When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon |
1854 |
> > rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux |
1855 |
> > /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I |
1856 |
> > run grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found |
1857 |
> > linux image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but |
1858 |
> > rather grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where |
1859 |
> > /boot is or what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 |
1860 |
> > config from within a chroot? |
1861 |
> > |
1862 |
> > Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo |
1863 |
> > system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of |
1864 |
> > /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs. |
1865 |
> > I must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will |
1866 |
> > work. Is there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For |
1867 |
> > now I have simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but |
1868 |
> > I'm curious to know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own |
1869 |
> > somehow. |
1870 |
> > |
1871 |
> > Thanks, Paul |
1872 |
> > |
1873 |
> |
1874 |
> If I recall correctly you need to mount /sys for grub2 to sucessfully |
1875 |
> detect devices. |
1876 |
> mount -o bind /sys <path-to-gentoo/sys should suffice. |
1877 |
> proc and dev should be mounted according to the manual. |
1878 |
> |
1879 |
> If you use a /boot- partition mount it, when you are inside the chroot. |
1880 |
> Doing so it worked like a charm for all devices I installed that way |
1881 |
> (3 in the last 3 months, if I recall correctly). |
1882 |
> |
1883 |
> With kind regards, |
1884 |
> |
1885 |
> Hinnerk |
1886 |
> |
1887 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
1888 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
1889 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
1890 |
> |
1891 |
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPs2UIAAoJEJwwOFaNFkYcgrcIALVB1QY/HOX/xkDesJkRSLjS |
1892 |
> rvK4m/WDde6FsmT2B3XSSZ9W6aVAfdJO8+GM+0MolpRT64fp7wNtAr0yaV4ALRr8 |
1893 |
> tNxk0YqWXPcSmh4LIsagKKnMuCCajHXZMK7AWPqnyAtifKPlP14j4H2T9cNegPvz |
1894 |
> doR9DF2sU/TPyCzVrvq1ouMelXkao9EC7ejQ39nnZ12PrxrdqapITpkqjJ2OuTOn |
1895 |
> NylZS6HQnZw+A8uLVuUD+Mclu/Z+sRbSEUAQelHSDe3knA7MZTkeXBrUoKj4g63r |
1896 |
> 2YRnrJACxeeJkIVxGOuVTQIT7a0A5TZHzMiv8wWTbIfDstPUBkGd3iV6Jvl3ndM= |
1897 |
> =tTo+ |
1898 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
1899 |
> |
1900 |
> Hello everybody, |
1901 |
> |
1902 |
> I was wondering if the following is possible: |
1903 |
> - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default |
1904 |
> - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time) |
1905 |
> |
1906 |
> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
1907 |
> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
1908 |
> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
1909 |
> |
1910 |
> Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just |
1911 |
> give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them |
1912 |
> could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with |
1913 |
> openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know, |
1914 |
> whether I need anything else. |
1915 |
> |
1916 |
> Thanks for help, |
1917 |
> Ignas A. |
1918 |
> |
1919 |
> On 15 May 2012 23:19, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
1920 |
> > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote: |
1921 |
> |
1922 |
> >> I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly |
1923 |
> >> think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug. |
1924 |
> >> |
1925 |
> >> Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to |
1926 |
> >> say? |
1927 |
> > |
1928 |
> > I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it |
1929 |
> is |
1930 |
> > supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when |
1931 |
> called |
1932 |
> > with tsocks). I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at |
1933 |
> all. |
1934 |
> |
1935 |
> OK, I just noticed that launching chromium from a terminal brings up |
1936 |
> this error, so it is not tsocks specific: |
1937 |
> |
1938 |
> $ chromium |
1939 |
> [4163:4174:213397467:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call |
1940 |
> method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name |
1941 |
> org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files |
1942 |
> |
1943 |
> |
1944 |
> > The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely |
1945 |
> ignore |
1946 |
> > it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up. |
1947 |
> Is |
1948 |
> > there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail? |
1949 |
> |
1950 |
> Yep, it is a coincidence it seems: |
1951 |
> |
1952 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408427 |
1953 |
> |
1954 |
> -- |
1955 |
> Regards, |
1956 |
> Mick |
1957 |
> |
1958 |
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius |
1959 |
> <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
1960 |
> > Hello everybody, |
1961 |
> > |
1962 |
> > I was wondering if the following is possible: |
1963 |
> > - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default |
1964 |
> > - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time) |
1965 |
> > |
1966 |
> > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
1967 |
> > services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
1968 |
> > Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
1969 |
> > |
1970 |
> > Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just |
1971 |
> > give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them |
1972 |
> > could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with |
1973 |
> > openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know, |
1974 |
> > whether I need anything else. |
1975 |
> |
1976 |
> Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported, |
1977 |
> and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine |
1978 |
> I have access to that still uses OpenRC. |
1979 |
> |
1980 |
> You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box) |
1981 |
> exactly what you want to. |
1982 |
> |
1983 |
> Regards. |
1984 |
> -- |
1985 |
> Canek Peláez Valdés |
1986 |
> Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
1987 |
> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
1988 |
> |
1989 |
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
1990 |
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius |
1991 |
> > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
1992 |
> >> Hello everybody, |
1993 |
> >> |
1994 |
> >> I was wondering if the following is possible: |
1995 |
> >> - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default |
1996 |
> >> - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time) |
1997 |
> >> |
1998 |
> >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
1999 |
> >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
2000 |
> >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
2001 |
> >> |
2002 |
> >> Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just |
2003 |
> >> give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them |
2004 |
> >> could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with |
2005 |
> >> openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know, |
2006 |
> >> whether I need anything else. |
2007 |
> > |
2008 |
> > Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported, |
2009 |
> > and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine |
2010 |
> > I have access to that still uses OpenRC. |
2011 |
> > |
2012 |
> > You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box) |
2013 |
> > exactly what you want to. |
2014 |
> > |
2015 |
> > Regards. |
2016 |
> |
2017 |
> |
2018 |
> Just to add for the OP, this was discussed on -dev and it was removed, |
2019 |
> although you can still try it if you want, a good while back because it |
2020 |
> was causing problems. I don't know anything much about systemsd but |
2021 |
> according to the devs, you shouldn't use the parallel option with openRC |
2022 |
> unless you want to keep up with the problems. |
2023 |
> |
2024 |
> Dale |
2025 |
> |
2026 |
> :-) :-) |
2027 |
> |
2028 |
> -- |
2029 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
2030 |
> how you interpreted my words! |
2031 |
> |
2032 |
> Miss the compile output? Hint: |
2033 |
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
2034 |
> |
2035 |
> On 05/16/2012 01:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius wrote: |
2036 |
> |
2037 |
> > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
2038 |
> > services are being started |
2039 |
> |
2040 |
> I can barely remember when I was young enough to care about saving |
2041 |
> a few seconds. (But, good for you :) |
2042 |
> |
2043 |
> Have you heard of systemd? Yet another evil conspiracy spawned by |
2044 |
> Lennart Poettering, father of pulseaudio and scourge of old fossils |
2045 |
> (like many of us here) who avoid any form of progress. |
2046 |
> |
2047 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd |
2048 |
> |
2049 |
> My evil twin, Walter Dnes, has been agitating for systemd in this |
2050 |
> mailing list for months. He actually knows how systemd works and |
2051 |
> can be persuaded to... well, I expect he'll be along shortly to |
2052 |
> tell you about it. |
2053 |
> |
2054 |
> |
2055 |
> Hello, |
2056 |
> |
2057 |
> I do need the ruby-gem linecache19-0.5.12. Usually, there are two ways to |
2058 |
> install a gem, right? Via emerge and via gem install. But here, only one |
2059 |
> way works. dev-ruby/linecache only builds the |
2060 |
> ruby18-version |
2061 |
> of |
2062 |
> this gem, so I'm stuck with gem install. But gem install fails with the |
2063 |
> following error: |
2064 |
> |
2065 |
> trace_nums.c:(.text+0x22): undefined reference to `ruby_current_thread' |
2066 |
> |
2067 |
> |
2068 |
> I am using ruby-1.9.3p194, but tried with different versions as well. |
2069 |
> |
2070 |
> Does anyone have a clue what I can do to solve the problem and get |
2071 |
> linecache19-0.5.12 installed? |
2072 |
> |
2073 |
> Thanks in advance, |
2074 |
> |
2075 |
> Christian. |
2076 |
> |
2077 |
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:26 +0100, Ignas Anikevicius wrote: |
2078 |
> |
2079 |
> > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
2080 |
> > services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
2081 |
> > Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
2082 |
> |
2083 |
> Yes it is. The initscripts themselves have such a mechanism, using the |
2084 |
> before and after statements, for example making sure that network |
2085 |
> services are started after the network is brought up. You can add your |
2086 |
> own rules to the daemons' config files in /etc/conf.d or to /etc/rc.conf. |
2087 |
> |
2088 |
> To have bitlbee start after xdm either add |
2089 |
> |
2090 |
> rc_after="xdm" |
2091 |
> |
2092 |
> to /etc/conf.d/bitlbee or put |
2093 |
> |
2094 |
> rc_bitlbee_after="xdm" |
2095 |
> |
2096 |
> in /etc/rc.conf. Both have the same effect, it depends on whether you |
2097 |
> want to put all these settings together or in the individual services' |
2098 |
> config files. |
2099 |
> |
2100 |
> |
2101 |
> -- |
2102 |
> Neil Bothwick |
2103 |
> |
2104 |
> Tact is for people who don't understand sarcasm. |
2105 |
> |
2106 |
> On 16/05/12 14:15, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2107 |
> > On Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:26 +0100, Ignas Anikevicius wrote: |
2108 |
> > |
2109 |
> >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
2110 |
> >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
2111 |
> >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
2112 |
> > |
2113 |
> > Yes it is. The initscripts themselves have such a mechanism, using the |
2114 |
> > before and after statements, for example making sure that network |
2115 |
> > services are started after the network is brought up. You can add your |
2116 |
> > own rules to the daemons' config files in /etc/conf.d or to /etc/rc.conf. |
2117 |
> > |
2118 |
> > To have bitlbee start after xdm either add |
2119 |
> > |
2120 |
> > rc_after="xdm" |
2121 |
> > |
2122 |
> > to /etc/conf.d/bitlbee or put |
2123 |
> > |
2124 |
> > rc_bitlbee_after="xdm" |
2125 |
> > |
2126 |
> > in /etc/rc.conf. Both have the same effect, it depends on whether you |
2127 |
> > want to put all these settings together or in the individual services' |
2128 |
> > config files. |
2129 |
> > |
2130 |
> |
2131 |
> Thanks for the tip!, I will use this to see how much difference do I |
2132 |
> get. :) |
2133 |
> |
2134 |
> Cheers, |
2135 |
> Ignas |
2136 |
> |
2137 |
> On 16/05/12 13:13, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2138 |
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius |
2139 |
> > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote: |
2140 |
> >> Hello everybody, |
2141 |
> >> |
2142 |
> >> I was wondering if the following is possible: |
2143 |
> >> - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default |
2144 |
> >> - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time) |
2145 |
> >> |
2146 |
> >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial |
2147 |
> >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few). |
2148 |
> >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts? |
2149 |
> >> |
2150 |
> >> Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just |
2151 |
> >> give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them |
2152 |
> >> could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with |
2153 |
> >> openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know, |
2154 |
> >> whether I need anything else. |
2155 |
> > |
2156 |
> > Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported, |
2157 |
> > and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine |
2158 |
> > I have access to that still uses OpenRC. |
2159 |
> > |
2160 |
> > You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box) |
2161 |
> > exactly what you want to. |
2162 |
> > |
2163 |
> > Regards. |
2164 |
> |
2165 |
> I did know, that this was removed. If I experience problems I'll remove |
2166 |
> the option, but maybe I'll remove it all together. |
2167 |
> |
2168 |
> I have systemd installed as I wanted to try, but I do not like the way |
2169 |
> everything is managed. I like the idea of simple bash initscripts, which |
2170 |
> can be easily extended if needed. I can also write bash scripts, which |
2171 |
> configure my system the way I want (i.e. set battery charging thresholds |
2172 |
> or something similar). |
2173 |
> |
2174 |
> I do not care for a split second advantage, but I just do not see a lot |
2175 |
> of point in waiting for bitlbee to start before xdm so that I might need |
2176 |
> maybe a while after I boot into my computer. |
2177 |
> |
2178 |
> Thanks for suggestions to everybody. |
2179 |
> |
2180 |
> Cheers, |
2181 |
> Ignas |
2182 |
> |
2183 |
> |
2184 |
> Hello, |
2185 |
> |
2186 |
> I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try |
2187 |
> emerge I get the following |
2188 |
> |
2189 |
> [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking |
2190 |
> media-video/libav-0.8.2) |
2191 |
> |
2192 |
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be |
2193 |
> * installed at the same time on the same system. |
2194 |
> |
2195 |
> (media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) |
2196 |
> pulled in by media-video/ffmpeg required by @selected |
2197 |
> |
2198 |
> (media-video/libav-0.8.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled |
2199 |
> in by |
2200 |
> |
2201 |
> >=media-video/libav-0.8.1[X,encode,-jpeg2k,-mp3,-sdl,-theora,-threads,-truetype,-vaapi,-vdpau,-x264] |
2202 |
> required by (virtual/ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for |
2203 |
> merge) |
2204 |
> |
2205 |
> |
2206 |
> This happens for several use flags (mp3 aac) |
2207 |
> |
2208 |
> |
2209 |
> Does this mean that ffmpeg no longer supports mp3 x264 theora etc? |
2210 |
> |
2211 |
> And if I need to codecise an mp3 I cannot use ffmpeg? |
2212 |
> |
2213 |
> Or have I lost the plot? |
2214 |
> -- |
2215 |
> John D Maunder |
2216 |
> |
2217 |
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:29:11 +0000 |
2218 |
> john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2219 |
> |
2220 |
> > |
2221 |
> > Hello, |
2222 |
> > |
2223 |
> > I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try |
2224 |
> > emerge I get the following |
2225 |
> > |
2226 |
> > [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking |
2227 |
> > media-video/libav-0.8.2) |
2228 |
> > |
2229 |
> > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be |
2230 |
> > * installed at the same time on the same system. |
2231 |
> > |
2232 |
> > (media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) |
2233 |
> > pulled in by media-video/ffmpeg required by @selected |
2234 |
> > |
2235 |
> > (media-video/libav-0.8.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled |
2236 |
> > in by |
2237 |
> > |
2238 |
> >=media-video/libav-0.8.1[X,encode,-jpeg2k,-mp3,-sdl,-theora,-threads,-truetype,-vaapi,-vdpau,-x264] |
2239 |
> > required by (virtual/ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for |
2240 |
> > merge) |
2241 |
> > |
2242 |
> > |
2243 |
> > This happens for several use flags (mp3 aac) |
2244 |
> > |
2245 |
> > |
2246 |
> > Does this mean that ffmpeg no longer supports mp3 x264 theora etc? |
2247 |
> |
2248 |
> No, it means that ffmpeg and libav provide the same functionalityand |
2249 |
> thus cannot both be installed on the same machine at the same time, |
2250 |
> you need to pick one (libav is actually a fork of ffmpeg). See here: |
2251 |
> |
2252 |
> |
2253 |
> http://blogs.gentoo.org/scarabeus/2012/05/14/media-videolibav-stable-on-most-important-archs/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed |
2254 |
> |
2255 |
> |
2256 |
> > |
2257 |
> > And if I need to codecise an mp3 I cannot use ffmpeg? |
2258 |
> > |
2259 |
> > Or have I lost the plot? |
2260 |
> |
2261 |
> |
2262 |
> |
2263 |
> -- |
2264 |
> Alan McKinnnon |
2265 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
2266 |
> |
2267 |
> |
2268 |
> Hi, Gentoo! |
2269 |
> |
2270 |
> Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of |
2271 |
> <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is |
2272 |
> regardless of which application is currently active. This is |
2273 |
> particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the |
2274 |
> screen. |
2275 |
> |
2276 |
> I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event |
2277 |
> library (I can't remember exactly what this was). |
2278 |
> |
2279 |
> I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it |
2280 |
> stop? |
2281 |
> |
2282 |
> -- |
2283 |
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
2284 |
> |
2285 |
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote: |
2286 |
> > Hi, Gentoo! |
2287 |
> > |
2288 |
> > Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of |
2289 |
> > <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is |
2290 |
> > regardless of which application is currently active. This is |
2291 |
> > particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the |
2292 |
> > screen. |
2293 |
> > |
2294 |
> > I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event |
2295 |
> > library (I can't remember exactly what this was). |
2296 |
> > |
2297 |
> > I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it |
2298 |
> > stop? |
2299 |
> |
2300 |
> I would downgrade to previous version of the evdev driver and see if |
2301 |
> it helps. Or disable/change the shortcut for print screen as a |
2302 |
> temporary workaround. |
2303 |
> |
2304 |
> On 05/16/2012 03:00 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
2305 |
> > Hi, Gentoo! |
2306 |
> > |
2307 |
> > Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of |
2308 |
> > <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is |
2309 |
> > regardless of which application is currently active. This is |
2310 |
> > particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the |
2311 |
> > screen. |
2312 |
> > |
2313 |
> > I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event |
2314 |
> > library (I can't remember exactly what this was). |
2315 |
> > |
2316 |
> > I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it |
2317 |
> > stop? |
2318 |
> |
2319 |
> You did me a huge favor by asking that question, thanks! While poking |
2320 |
> around in the keyboard settings applet I discovered a well-hidden option |
2321 |
> to disable the Caps-Lock key. I hit that stupid thing by accident at |
2322 |
> least ten times/hour and say very vulgar things when it happens ;) |
2323 |
> |
2324 |
> The keyboard-shortcuts applet does have an option to change the screenshot |
2325 |
> hotkey, so maybe something changed it behind your back? |
2326 |
> |
2327 |
> |
2328 |
> |
2329 |
> |
2330 |
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:12:25 -0400 |
2331 |
> Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2332 |
> |
2333 |
> > 120515 Philip Webb wrote: |
2334 |
> > > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote: |
2335 |
> > >> I just tried with fotoxx. |
2336 |
> > >> This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the |
2337 |
> > >> resulting image. |
2338 |
> > |
2339 |
> > I've installed Fotoxx & it does a very good job ! |
2340 |
> > |
2341 |
> > >> The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg. |
2342 |
> > |
2343 |
> > There's no sign of it on my version : |
2344 |
> > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/brum-3.jpg |
2345 |
> > |
2346 |
> > >> It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging |
2347 |
> > >> and therefore the clock and the face on the image |
2348 |
> > >> borders stay in the image. |
2349 |
> > |
2350 |
> > They're on my image, but I can't find out how to turn it |
2351 |
> > into a rectangle. NB there are noticeable curves at the |
2352 |
> > R-hand edge not in the original: look at the sidewalk |
2353 |
> > curve & at the building pediment. Any suggestions ? -- |
2354 |
> > otherwise, this looks like the tool to use. |
2355 |
> > |
2356 |
> |
2357 |
> Transform -> Unbend Image |
2358 |
> Play with the vertical values, this is very easy, fast and |
2359 |
> intuitive. With brum-3.jpg the best combination was: |
2360 |
> vertical linear 5, vertical curved -16, Done |
2361 |
> and after that |
2362 |
> Transform -> Trim Image or even easier |
2363 |
> Transform -> Auto-Trim Image to get rid of the black areas. |
2364 |
> |
2365 |
> In the case of brum-3.jpg apply a little bit of |
2366 |
> Retouch -> Gamma Curves, (bend the left part of the curve |
2367 |
> a little bit to the bottom, and the right part to the top) |
2368 |
> to enhance the image contrast. |
2369 |
> Normally the image looses a little bit of sharpness during |
2370 |
> the panorama stitching. You can correct this with: |
2371 |
> Retouch -> Sharpen Image. |
2372 |
> |
2373 |
> But: If you would like to make an exhibit, then you get |
2374 |
> better image quality if you bring the negatives to an old |
2375 |
> fashioned photographer for direct enlargement on B&W photo |
2376 |
> paper. |
2377 |
> |
2378 |
> Urs |
2379 |
> |
2380 |
> On 05/16/2012 07:08 PM, walt wrote: |
2381 |
> |
2382 |
>> You did me a huge favor by asking that question, thanks! While poking |
2383 |
>> around in the keyboard settings applet I discovered a well-hidden option to |
2384 |
>> disable the Caps-Lock key. I hit that stupid thing by accident at least ten |
2385 |
>> times/hour and say very vulgar things when it happens ;) The |
2386 |
>> keyboard-shortcuts applet does have an option to change the screenshot |
2387 |
>> hotkey, so maybe something changed it behind your back? |
2388 |
>> |
2389 |
> Could you amplify a little bit and reveal exactly what applet you used and |
2390 |
> where the little option is located? |
2391 |
> |
2392 |
> Thanks, |
2393 |
> -- |
2394 |
> G.Wolfe Woodbury |
2395 |
> aka redwolfe |
2396 |
> |
2397 |
> |
2398 |
> |