Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: KockKin Ko <kockkinko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] UN-subscribe -- Digest of gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 04:53:04
Message-Id: CAGTVsqkruW+ETXEmQ2vChb3PTkRGwkuh43kFsoA7Vybn19u7Og@mail.gmail.com
1 UN-subscribe -- Digest of gentoo-user@l.g.o
2
3 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:06 AM, <gentoo-user+help@l.g.o> wrote:
4
5 > Topics (messages 138328 through 138377):
6 >
7 > [gentoo-user] Re: mplayer2 idle CPU condumption
8 > 138328 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>
9 >
10 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
11 > 138329 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
12 >
13 > [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: solving curl dependency issues
14 > 138330 - Space Cake <spacecakex@×××××.com>
15 >
16 > [gentoo-user] I want to play movies without hangs [SOLVED, sort of]
17 > 138331 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>
18 >
19 > [gentoo-user] HP A8 laptop install
20 > 138332 - Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>
21 >
22 > [gentoo-user] Encfs suddenly read-only -- DISK FAILURE
23 > 138333 - felix@×××××××.com
24 >
25 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
26 > 138334 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
27 >
28 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
29 > 138335 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
30 >
31 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
32 > 138336 - john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk>
33 >
34 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
35 > 138337 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
36 >
37 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
38 > 138338 - Alecks Gates <alecks.g@×××××.com>
39 >
40 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
41 > 138339 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
42 >
43 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
44 > 138340 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
45 >
46 > [gentoo-user] OT: Hack your TV
47 > 138341 - James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
48 >
49 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
50 > 138342 - Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
51 >
52 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
53 > 138343 - Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
54 >
55 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
56 > 138344 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
57 >
58 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
59 > 138345 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
60 >
61 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
62 > 138346 - Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
63 >
64 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
65 > 138347 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
66 >
67 > [gentoo-user] Advice Needed: Conexant HD-Audio noisy audio
68 > 138348 - Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
69 >
70 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
71 > 138349 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
72 >
73 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
74 > 138350 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
75 >
76 > [gentoo-user] HP A8 laptop install
77 > 138351 - Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>
78 >
79 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
80 > 138352 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
81 >
82 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
83 > 138353 - Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>
84 >
85 > [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together
86 > 138354 - Urs Schutz <u.schutz@×××××××.ch>
87 >
88 > [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together
89 > 138355 - Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>
90 >
91 > [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
92 > 138356 - Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
93 >
94 > [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs
95 > 138357 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
96 >
97 > [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs
98 > 138358 - Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com>
99 >
100 > [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs
101 > 138359 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
102 >
103 > [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together
104 > 138360 - Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>
105 >
106 > [gentoo-user] Grub2, chroot, initramfs
107 > 138361 - Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>
108 >
109 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
110 > background
111 > 138362 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
112 >
113 > [gentoo-user] Socks-ifying an application
114 > 138363 - Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
115 >
116 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
117 > background
118 > 138364 - Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com>
119 >
120 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
121 > background
122 > 138365 - Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
123 >
124 > [gentoo-user] Re: Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
125 > background
126 > 138366 - walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
127 >
128 > [gentoo-user] gem install linecache19 fails
129 > 138367 - 1126 <mailinglists@××××××××××××××××××.de>
130 >
131 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
132 > background
133 > 138368 - Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
134 >
135 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
136 > background
137 > 138369 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
138 >
139 > [gentoo-user] Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in
140 > background
141 > 138370 - Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com>
142 >
143 > [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav
144 > 138371 - john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk>
145 >
146 > [gentoo-user] ffmpeg and libav
147 > 138372 - Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
148 >
149 > [gentoo-user] In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop this?
150 > 138373 - Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de>
151 >
152 > [gentoo-user] In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop this?
153 > 138374 - Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
154 >
155 > [gentoo-user] Re: In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop
156 > this?
157 > 138375 - walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
158 >
159 > [gentoo-user] merging or fitting images together
160 > 138376 - Urs Schutz <u.schutz@×××××××.ch>
161 >
162 > [gentoo-user] Re: In X: <up> wants to "save screenshot". How do I stop
163 > this?
164 > 138377 - "G.Wolfe Woodbury" <redwolfe@×××××.com>
165 >
166 >
167 >
168 > Alex Schuster writes:
169 >
170 > > I wrote:
171 >
172 > > > Thanks. Another thing that happens to me only. I filed a bug about
173 > > > this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415241
174 > >
175 > > I just found out it only happens when I start the video from within
176 > > Dolphin, and as my user. From the command line, or as another user with
177 > > an unconfigured KDE desktop, it does not happen. Something is very weird
178 > > here. Maybe I should start over with a clean KDE environment, AGAIN. But
179 > > I really really hate to do this every once in a while. Can't these
180 > > things just work?
181 >
182 > The bug report got some updates, it's not Dolphin's or KDE's fault, but
183 > mplayer2's, happens whenever it is started from a file manager. Something
184 > with terminal keyboard controls enabled by the file manager, but with
185 > stdin not being connected to anything readable.
186 >
187 > It's fixed upstream: http://devel.mplayer2.org/ticket/146
188 > Meanwhile, option -noconsolecontrols also helps.
189 >
190 > Wonko
191 >
192 > I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I can't seem to be able to get
193 > tsocks, or proxychains working.
194 >
195 > I set up a socks server virtue of ssh dynamic port forwarding:
196 >
197 > $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12
198 >
199 > Then I run:
200 >
201 > $ . tsocks on
202 > $ tsocks sh
203 > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
204 > $ tsocks firefox
205 >
206 > or tsocks kmail, or tsocks <anything else>.
207 >
208 > The connection is not sent out via the server on 10.10.10.12. The terminal
209 > that ran tsocks does not reveal anything in terms of a connection taking
210 > place, at least not when I run firefox. With Chromium things are more
211 > revealing:
212 >
213 > $ . tsocks on
214 > $ tsocks sh
215 > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
216 > $ tsocks chromium
217 > [4591:4604:405018909:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
218 > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
219 > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
220 > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
221 > preloaded: ignored.
222 >
223 >
224 > Exporting like this, also fails to load it for chromium:
225 >
226 > $ export LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libtsocks.so
227 > $ tsocks sh
228 > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
229 > $ tsocks chromium
230 > [5052:5065:973215173:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
231 > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
232 > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
233 > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
234 > preloaded: ignored.
235 >
236 >
237 >
238 > If I set up socks within the firefox application Advanced/Network
239 > settings, without using tsocks, the connection succeeds through the
240 > ssh tunnel. Therefore I am confident that the tunnel itself is
241 > working as a socks5 server.
242 >
243 >
244 > This is what I have in /etc/socks/tsocks.conf
245 >
246 > server = 127.0.0.1
247 > server_type = 5
248 > server_port = 12465
249 >
250 > Similarly, I get no connection if I use proxychains.
251 >
252 > Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
253 >
254 > --
255 > Regards,
256 > Mick
257 >
258 > Thank you. It seems to be ok now
259 >
260 > [ebuild R ~] net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1 CURL_SSL="gnutls* -openssl*"
261 > [ebuild R ~] net-libs/liboauth-0.9.6 USE="-curl*"
262 >
263 > >=net-misc/curl-7.24.0 -curl_ssl_nss -curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_gnutls ssl
264 > -nss ssh
265 >
266 >
267 > Laszlo
268 >
269 >
270 > On 2012. máj. 14., hétfő, 17.34.19 CEST, Alan McKinnon wrote:
271 >
272 >>
273 >> On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:02:15 +0200
274 >> Space Cake<spacecakex@×××××.com> wrote:
275 >>
276 >>
277 >>> Removing keywords from curl produces this
278 >>>
279 >>> brutal keywords # emerge --keep-going -upND world
280 >>>
281 >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
282 >>>
283 >>> Calculating dependencies... done!
284 >>>
285 >>> emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
286 >>> "net-misc/curl[ssl,curl_ssl_**nss]".
287 >>> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your
288 >>> request:
289 >>> - net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1::**gentoo (Change USE: +curl_ssl_nss, this
290 >>> change violates use flag constraints defined by
291 >>> net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1: 'threads? ( !ares ) ssl? ( exactly-one-of (
292 >>> curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl
293 >>> curl_ssl_nss curl_ssl_polarssl ) )')
294 >>> (dependency required by
295 >>> "net-libs/liboauth-0.9.6[curl,**nss]" [installed]) (dependency required
296 >>> by
297 >>> "gnome-extra/evolution-data-**server-3.2.3-r1[gnome-online-**accounts]"
298 >>> [installed])
299 >>> (dependency required by
300 >>> "gnome-extra/gnome-contacts-3.**2.2" [installed]) (dependency required
301 >>> by "@selected" [set]) (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
302 >>>
303 >>>
304 >>> eix output:[I] net-misc/curl
305 >>> Available versions: 7.21.4 (~)7.21.6 (~)7.21.7 (~)7.21.7-r2
306 >>> (~)7.22.0 (~)7.23.1 7.24.0 (~)7.25.0 (~)7.25.0-r1 {ares
307 >>> curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_nss
308 >>> +curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_polarssl gnutls idn ipv6 kerberos ldap nss
309 >>> ssh ssl static-libs test threads}
310 >>> Installed versions: 7.25.0-r1(12.34.47
311 >>> 2012-05-14)(curl_ssl_openssl idn ipv6 ldap ssh ssl threads -ares
312 >>> -curl_ssl_axtls -curl_ssl_cyassl -curl_ssl_gnutls -curl_ssl_nss
313 >>> -curl_ssl_polarssl -kerberos -static-libs -test)
314 >>> Homepage: http://curl.haxx.se/
315 >>> Description: A Client that groks URLs
316 >>>
317 >>>
318 >>> So, this is asking for curl_ssl_nss,
319 >>>
320 >>> But after I set this I'm getting this
321 >>>
322 >>> brutal ~ # emerge --keep-going -upND world
323 >>>
324 >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
325 >>>
326 >>> Calculating dependencies /
327 >>>
328 >>> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for net-misc/curl from @selected
329 >>> ... done!
330 >>>
331 >>> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "net-misc/curl" has unmet
332 >>> requirements.
333 >>> - net-misc/curl-7.25.0-r1::**gentoo USE="idn ipv6 ldap ssl threads
334 >>> -ares -kerberos -ssh -static-libs -test" CURL_SSL="nss openssl -axtls
335 >>> -cyassl -gnutls -polarssl"
336 >>>
337 >>> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
338 >>> ssl? ( exactly-one-of ( curl_ssl_axtls curl_ssl_cyassl
339 >>> curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss curl_ssl_polarssl ) )
340 >>>
341 >>> The above constraints are a subset of the following complete
342 >>> expression:
343 >>> threads? ( !ares ) ssl? ( exactly-one-of ( curl_ssl_axtls
344 >>> curl_ssl_cyassl curl_ssl_gnutls curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss
345 >>> curl_ssl_polarssl ) )
346 >>>
347 >>> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
348 >>> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
349 >>>
350 >>>
351 >>>
352 >>>
353 >>> On 2012. máj. 14., hétfő, 15.08.17 CEST, walt wrote:
354 >>>
355 >>>>
356 >>>> On 05/14/2012 03:49 AM, Space Cake wrote:
357 >>>>
358 >>>>>
359 >>>>> Hi,
360 >>>>>
361 >>>>> For several weeks I'm trying to solve dependency issues with curl,
362 >>>>> but I'm lost.. any idea?
363 >>>>>
364 >>>>
365 >>>>
366 >>>> That problem drove me nuts for months. I finally discovered by
367 >>>> desperate trial and error that un-setting the 'curl' useflag fixes
368 >>>> it. Finally!
369 >>>>
370 >>>>
371 >>>>
372 >>>>
373 >>>
374 >>>
375 >>
376 >> The requirements are (from the error message):
377 >>
378 >> If USE=ssl then use exactly one of the following:
379 >> curl_ssl_axtls
380 >> curl_ssl_cyassl
381 >> curl_ssl_gnutls
382 >> curl_ssl_openssl
383 >> curl_ssl_nss
384 >> curl_ssl_polarssl
385 >>
386 >> You have the following set for curl (per eix):
387 >>
388 >> curl_ssl_openssl
389 >>
390 >> But the error message also says that this is required:
391 >> net-misc/curl[ssl,curl_ssl_**nss] by liboauth
392 >>
393 >> You cannot have curl_ssl_nss and curl_ssl_openssl both set for curl as
394 >> liboauth complains
395 >>
396 >> So, what you need to do is set
397 >>
398 >> USE="-curl_ssl_openssl curl_ssl_nss" for curl
399 >>
400 >> If you read my post carefully and see how all the bits fit the output
401 >> you supplied, it all makes sense. Portage output is not exactly
402 >> intuitive but it can be understood.
403 >>
404 >> Or you could unset USE="curl" for liboauth.
405 >>
406 >> I don't know if you'll be willing to switch from curl_ssl just to make
407 >> liboauth happy. That's your call.
408 >>
409 >
410 >
411 > Paul Hartman writes:
412 >
413 > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>
414 > > wrote:
415 > > > Finally, I found something. It's Dolphin!
416 > [...]
417 > > > Now, would this be an MPlayer problem, or one of Dolphin?
418 > >
419 > > I wonder if Dolphin is generating thumbnails/preview indexes at the
420 > > same time you're trying to play, causing resource contention.
421 >
422 > Sometimes it does that, but that would happen when I play from the command
423 > line, too. And now it even works from Dolphin, when it is set to open
424 > mplayer in a terminal. So this cannot be the problem. And even if it
425 > were, avoiding thumbnails would be a bad workaround only, such operations
426 > should not affect video playback.
427 >
428 > Maybe this is somehow related to the other problem I had with mplayer2
429 > only, using 100% CPU when idle, only when started from a file manager.
430 >
431 > Wonko
432 >
433 > On 15.05.2012 11:11, Alex Schuster wrote:
434 > > Stroller writes:
435 > >
436 > >> I boot from a SystemRescueCD and follow the Gentoo quick install guide.
437 > >>
438 > >> This has never failed me.
439 > >
440 > > For me it did, half a year ago, several packages failed to build due to
441 > > strange libtool errors. It took me some days until I found the solution:
442 > > unset path.
443 > >
444 > > Libtool uses this variable without unsetting it before, and
445 > SystemRescueCD
446 > > defines it as environment variable, which is still available in the
447 > > chroot. This messed things up a lot.
448 > >
449 > > Apart from that, I really like SystemRescueCD.
450 > >
451 > > Wonko
452 > >
453 >
454 > Did you do env-update && . /etc/profile after entering chroot?
455 > I always thought that setting the right environment variables was the
456 > purpose of that.
457 >
458 > I personally an Ubuntu-Live-Thumbdrive, because some time ago (2 years
459 > or so) it wasn't possible to install gentoo with LUKS on a btrfs volume
460 > from the gentoo minimal cd.
461 >
462 > The advantage of a live cd (especially for a beginner) is the
463 > possibility to read the manual and google problems while installing.
464 > Another possibility to do that would be an installation via ssh (works
465 > nice too).
466 >
467 >
468 >
469 > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:33:48AM -0700, felix@×××××××.com wrote:
470 > > I have been using encfs to store most of my home dir for ages. I
471 > rebooted Sunday morning (it's a ~amd64 system) to change kernel to 3.3.5
472 > from 3.3.4, and sometime overnight, after the nightly backups and mail
473 > archives had run, the encfs mounted partition became read-only. I know the
474 > timing only by the cron jobs; the nightly mail backup moves files from the
475 > /home partition to the encfs partition, and it had not failed. I unmounted
476 > the encfs partition, remounted, and it was read-only right from the get go.
477 >
478 > It's a failing disk drive:
479 >
480 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600747] hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
481 > DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
482 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600759] hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
483 > UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=94761183, sector=94761183
484 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600788] hda: possibly failed opcode: 0x25
485 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600794] end_request: I/O error, dev hda,
486 > sector 94761183
487 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600835] REISERFS error (device hda5):
488 > vs-13070 reiserfs_read_locked_inode: i/o failure occurred trying to find
489 > stat data of [2511 633054 0x0 SD]
490 > May 15 03:30:26 kernel: [80220.600840] REISERFS (device hda5):
491 > Remounting filesystem read-only
492 > May 15 03:30:31 kernel: [80224.859713] hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
493 > DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
494 >
495 > > There are no errors in /var/log/messages of any sort since the 3.3.5
496 > boot. The mount command showed both the encfs partition and the underlying
497 > regular partition as rw, not ro.
498 >
499 > I didn't see it the first time because I rebooted twice and only looked
500 > since the second reboot, after spending a while googling for hints and
501 > forgetting about the double reboot.
502 >
503 > --
504 > ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
505 > Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
506 > GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license
507 > #4933
508 > I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of
509 > room o
510 >
511 > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100
512 > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
513 >
514 > > I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I can't seem to be able to
515 > > get tsocks, or proxychains working.
516 > >
517 > > I set up a socks server virtue of ssh dynamic port forwarding:
518 > >
519 > > $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12
520 >
521 > This part is fine.
522 >
523 > I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me.
524 >
525 > So what I do now is:
526 >
527 > Firefox + FoxyProxy
528 >
529 > and now I can set my proxy individually per site. All the internal work
530 > stuff accessed from home goes through the proxy, except the three sites
531 > only viewable from the outside; and everything else bypasses the proxy.
532 >
533 > Much better than trying to deal with a global proxy (although foxyproxy
534 > will do that too if that is what you need.
535 >
536 > And dispense with all the tsocks stuff.
537 >
538 > I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new addition
539 > so konqueror can also use it.
540 >
541 >
542 >
543 >
544 > >
545 > > Then I run:
546 > >
547 > > $ . tsocks on
548 > > $ tsocks sh
549 > > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
550 > > $ tsocks firefox
551 > >
552 > > or tsocks kmail, or tsocks <anything else>.
553 > >
554 > > The connection is not sent out via the server on 10.10.10.12. The
555 > > terminal that ran tsocks does not reveal anything in terms of a
556 > > connection taking place, at least not when I run firefox. With
557 > > Chromium things are more revealing:
558 > >
559 > > $ . tsocks on
560 > > $ tsocks sh
561 > > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
562 > > $ tsocks chromium
563 > > [4591:4604:405018909:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
564 > > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
565 > > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
566 > > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
567 > > preloaded: ignored.
568 > >
569 > >
570 > > Exporting like this, also fails to load it for chromium:
571 > >
572 > > $ export LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libtsocks.so
573 > > $ tsocks sh
574 > > LD_PRELOAD="/lib/libtsocks.so"
575 > > $ tsocks chromium
576 > > [5052:5065:973215173:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
577 > > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
578 > > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
579 > > ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib/libtsocks.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
580 > > preloaded: ignored.
581 > >
582 > >
583 > >
584 > > If I set up socks within the firefox application Advanced/Network
585 > > settings, without using tsocks, the connection succeeds through the
586 > > ssh tunnel. Therefore I am confident that the tunnel itself is
587 > > working as a socks5 server.
588 > >
589 > >
590 > > This is what I have in /etc/socks/tsocks.conf
591 > >
592 > > server = 127.0.0.1
593 > > server_type = 5
594 > > server_port = 12465
595 > >
596 > > Similarly, I get no connection if I use proxychains.
597 > >
598 > > Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
599 > >
600 >
601 >
602 >
603 > --
604 > Alan McKinnnon
605 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
606 >
607 >
608 > On 15 May 2012 15:45, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
609 > > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100
610 > > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
611 >
612 > >> $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12
613 > >
614 > > This part is fine.
615 > >
616 > > I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me.
617 >
618 > Ah, thanks for this! It's reassuring to know that it's not just my
619 > system. :-)
620 >
621 >
622 > > So what I do now is:
623 > >
624 > > Firefox + FoxyProxy
625 >
626 > Firefox is less of a problem for me because I can set it up to
627 > socksify everything. It is Kmail that I am mostly interested in.
628 >
629 >
630 > > I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new addition
631 > > so konqueror can also use it.
632 >
633 > Yes, but it does not work with the current stable kmail. The new
634 > KDEPIM is such a nightmare I do not plan moving to it anytime soon.
635 > It screwed up one box that I tried it on and that's enough for me.
636 > :-(
637 >
638 > Did you have any success with proxychains?
639 >
640 > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD error.
641 >
642 >
643 > I also noticed that when I try to set up a proxy server in Chromium
644 > using the 'under the bonnet' tab, I get this:
645 >
646 > "When running Chromium under a supported desktop environment, the
647 > system proxy settings will be used. However, either your system is not
648 > supported or there was a problem while launching your system
649 > configuration.
650 >
651 > But you can still configure via the command line. Please see man
652 > chromium-browser for more information on flags and environment
653 > variables."
654 >
655 > Trying the command line did not fix it:
656 >
657 > [4742:4753:1575546819:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
658 > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
659 > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
660 >
661 > That's what made me think that something on my system is not set up
662 > properly. :-/
663 >
664 >
665 > These are the libtsocks.so files in my system:
666 >
667 > # ls -la /lib*/libtsocks.so
668 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so -> libtsocks.so.1
669 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so ->
670 > libtsocks.so.1
671 >
672 > # ls -la /lib/libtsocks.so*
673 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so ->
674 > libtsocks.so.1
675 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1 ->
676 > libtsocks.so.1.8
677 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1.8
678 >
679 > # ls -la /lib64/libtsocks.so*
680 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so ->
681 > libtsocks.so.1
682 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1 ->
683 > libtsocks.so.1.8
684 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8
685 >
686 > I can't see why it would not load it, unless it should be trying to
687 > load the '/lib64/libtsocks.so' instead of the '/lib/libtsocks.so' on
688 > an amd64 system? Shall I file a bug?
689 > --
690 > Regards,
691 > Mick
692 >
693 > On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:46:39 -0500
694 > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
695 >
696 > > Alan McKinnon wrote:
697 > > > On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
698 > > > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
699 > > >
700 > > >> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top
701 > > >> posters on this list.
702 > > >
703 > > > Yo Dale,
704 > > >
705 > > > You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
706 > > >
707 > > > I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says
708 > > > Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me
709 > > > this year
710 > > >
711 > > > [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it
712 > > >
713 > > >
714 > > >
715 > >
716 > >
717 > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
718 > >
719 > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
720 > >
721 > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
722 > > Someone put alum in your water or something?
723 > >
724 > > ROFL
725 > >
726 > > Dale
727 > >
728 > > :-) :-)
729 > >
730 >
731 > Would like to thank all guys and girls for posting. Even though I post
732 > very little myself your posts are always excellent and there is plenty
733 > to learn from just reading them.
734 >
735 > There are things I can do now which I never thought possible. Thanks
736 >
737 > --
738 > John D Maunder
739 >
740 > Dear all,
741 >
742 > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I
743 > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is
744 > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and
745 > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use.
746 >
747 > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise
748 > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech.
749 >
750 > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident
751 > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise,
752 > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response
753 > of the speakers.
754 >
755 > Does anybody have some similar issues?
756 >
757 > My current audio setup:
758 >
759 > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well)
760 > * MPD for music playing
761 > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving
762 > features enabled.
763 >
764 > What I have tried to eliminate the noise:
765 >
766 > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer
767 > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings.
768 >
769 > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my
770 > Alsamixer:
771 >
772 > * Master ~50
773 > * PCM 100
774 > * Headphone 100
775 >
776 > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this?
777 >
778 > Thanks a lot,
779 > Ignas A.
780 >
781 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Ignas Anikevicius
782 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
783 > > Dear all,
784 > >
785 > > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I
786 > > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is
787 > > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and
788 > > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use.
789 > >
790 > > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise
791 > > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech.
792 > >
793 > > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident
794 > > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise,
795 > > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response
796 > > of the speakers.
797 > >
798 > > Does anybody have some similar issues?
799 > >
800 > > My current audio setup:
801 > >
802 > > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well)
803 > > * MPD for music playing
804 > > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving
805 > > features enabled.
806 > >
807 > > What I have tried to eliminate the noise:
808 > >
809 > > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer
810 > > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings.
811 > >
812 > > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my
813 > > Alsamixer:
814 > >
815 > > * Master ~50
816 > > * PCM 100
817 > > * Headphone 100
818 > >
819 > > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this?
820 > >
821 > > Thanks a lot,
822 > > Ignas A.
823 > >
824 >
825 > I would check the inputs in alsamixer and play around with them. I
826 > had a problem similar to this for many months and it was due to some
827 > funny input volume I didn't need, so I muted it.
828 >
829 > On 15/05/12 17:31, Alecks Gates wrote:
830 > > I would check the inputs in alsamixer and play around with them. I
831 > > had a problem similar to this for many months and it was due to some
832 > > funny input volume I didn't need, so I muted it.
833 >
834 > Thanks for replying, I have muted everything, except Headphones, Master,
835 > Speaker and PCM outputs, which *are* necessary to get any sound out of
836 > my machine either with headphones or speakers. Muting speakers when only
837 > headphones were used did not help.
838 >
839 > Cheers,
840 > I.
841 >
842 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ignas Anikevicius
843 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
844 > > Dear all,
845 > >
846 > > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I
847 > > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is
848 > > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and
849 > > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use.
850 > >
851 > > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise
852 > > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech.
853 > >
854 > > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident
855 > > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise,
856 > > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response
857 > > of the speakers.
858 > >
859 > > Does anybody have some similar issues?
860 > >
861 > > My current audio setup:
862 > >
863 > > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well)
864 > > * MPD for music playing
865 > > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving
866 > > features enabled.
867 > >
868 > > What I have tried to eliminate the noise:
869 > >
870 > > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer
871 > > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings.
872 > >
873 > > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my
874 > > Alsamixer:
875 > >
876 > > * Master ~50
877 > > * PCM 100
878 > > * Headphone 100
879 > >
880 > > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this?
881 >
882 > I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system
883 > electrical noise.
884 >
885 > What happens when you set:
886 >
887 > * Master -> 100
888 > * Headphone -> 100
889 > * Everything else -> 0
890 >
891 > ...but you're not playing anything? If you hear anything, then what
892 > you're hearing isn't something you can really deal with without using
893 > an external sound card. Any USB sound card would do fine. (A pair of
894 > 'gamer' headphones I bought at Best Buy advertised USB support...and
895 > it turns out they were packaged with a tiny USB<->3.5mm sound
896 > adapter.)
897 >
898 > If you don't hear the characteristic sound you're describing, then I'd
899 > expect you're encountering clipping. That's when the logical amplitude
900 > of a signal is greater than the medium holding it, and that happens a
901 > *lot* with integer PCM mixing and amplification.
902 >
903 > Unfortunately, there's little to no standardization as to what '0' and
904 > '100' mean between audio chipsets, so the best you can really do here
905 > is crank all of your sliders to maximum, and decrease some of them
906 > until you no longer hear the clipping. (And then remember which
907 > positions on the relevant sliders that corresponds to; it usually
908 > means you're getting no amplification, but also no attenuation.)
909 >
910 > --
911 > :wq
912 >
913 > Howdy,
914 >
915 > I could not resist this posting.
916 > As many of you know, I've been a
917 > real pain in the microprocessor lately....
918 > Particularly about Arm, A15 and Samsung.
919 >
920 > Well in keeping with that tradition, it seems
921 > Samsung TV's are now supporting SSH into them
922 > and directly and hacking the firmware:
923 >
924 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/samygo/
925 >
926 >
927 > Samsung is also very progressive on the A-15
928 > Arm development boards, which are sure to
929 > create quite a stir when they are widely
930 > available (soon I've heard):
931 >
932 >
933 > http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/03/07/samsung-exynos-5250-dual-core-cortex-a15-and-gaia-smdk-development-board/#ixzz1p5yR3p7B
934 >
935 >
936 > Samsung Galaxy Nexus cell-phone that runs SEandroid, natively:
937 >
938 > http://selinuxproject.org/page/SEAndroid
939 >
940 > Samsung is also moving aggresively to support
941 > open source drivers for (ARM) graphics chips:
942 >
943 >
944 > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Open-source-driver-for-ARM-s-Mali-graphics-appears-1432447.html
945 >
946 >
947 > ARM is preparing for domination and is looking rather cool these
948 > days and Samsung is surely one of the most appealing
949 > (ARM) vendors for the open source community.
950 >
951 >
952 > enjoy,
953 > James
954 >
955 >
956 > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
957 > > Alan McKinnon wrote:
958 > >> On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
959 > >> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
960 > >>
961 > >>> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
962 > >>> on this list.
963 > >>
964 > >> Yo Dale,
965 > >>
966 > >> You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
967 > >>
968 > >> I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says
969 > >> Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me
970 > >> this year
971 > >>
972 > >> [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it
973 > >>
974 > >>
975 > >>
976 > >
977 > >
978 > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
979 > >
980 > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
981 > >
982 > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
983 > > Someone put alum in your water or something?
984 > >
985 > > ROFL
986 > >
987 > > Dale
988 > >
989 >
990 > Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people?
991 > I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there
992 > apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-)
993 >
994 > - Mark
995 >
996 > Mark Knecht wrote:
997 > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
998 > >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
999 > >>> On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
1000 > >>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
1001 > >>>
1002 > >>>> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
1003 > >>>> on this list.
1004 > >>>
1005 > >>> Yo Dale,
1006 > >>>
1007 > >>> You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
1008 > >>>
1009 > >>> I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says
1010 > >>> Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me
1011 > >>> this year
1012 > >>>
1013 > >>> [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it
1014 > >>>
1015 > >>>
1016 > >>>
1017 > >>
1018 > >>
1019 > >> Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
1020 > >>
1021 > >> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
1022 > >>
1023 > >> I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
1024 > >> Someone put alum in your water or something?
1025 > >>
1026 > >> ROFL
1027 > >>
1028 > >> Dale
1029 > >>
1030 > >
1031 > > Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people?
1032 > > I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there
1033 > > apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-)
1034 > >
1035 > > - Mark
1036 > >
1037 > >
1038 >
1039 >
1040 > I'm wondering on this myself. Should I take more meds or are the meds
1041 > causing it? < scratches head >
1042 >
1043 > o_O
1044 >
1045 > Dale
1046 >
1047 > :-) :-)
1048 >
1049 > --
1050 > I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
1051 > how you interpreted my words!
1052 >
1053 > Miss the compile output? Hint:
1054 > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
1055 >
1056 > On 15/05/12 17:52, Michael Mol wrote:
1057 > > I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system
1058 > > electrical noise.
1059 > >
1060 > > What happens when you set:
1061 > >
1062 > > * Master -> 100
1063 > > * Headphone -> 100
1064 > > * Everything else -> 0
1065 >
1066 > If I do not play anything while PCM is at 0 and Master and Headphone are
1067 > at 100, then I do not hear anything. But if I start 'playing' something
1068 > while still with PCM at 0 (no sound can be heard), then I start hearing
1069 > irregular clipping sound.
1070 >
1071 > Is that what you expected?
1072 >
1073 > If I decrease the sound to a level where I stop hearing clipping, then I
1074 > can barely hear the music. Although the same headphones play on my
1075 > player fine.
1076 >
1077 > And It's a shame, that I indeed hear clipping. Are there any ways to
1078 > increase the sound volume without increasing the mixer setting in ALSA?
1079 > Would a different sound card help? Is there any way I can solve the
1080 > problem without buying new hardware?
1081 >
1082 > Thanks a lot for help,
1083 > I.
1084 >
1085 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ignas Anikevicius
1086 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
1087 > > On 15/05/12 17:52, Michael Mol wrote:
1088 > >> I have a strong expectation that part of what you're hearing is system
1089 > >> electrical noise.
1090 > >>
1091 > >> What happens when you set:
1092 > >>
1093 > >> * Master -> 100
1094 > >> * Headphone -> 100
1095 > >> * Everything else -> 0
1096 > >
1097 > > If I do not play anything while PCM is at 0 and Master and Headphone are
1098 > > at 100, then I do not hear anything. But if I start 'playing' something
1099 > > while still with PCM at 0 (no sound can be heard), then I start hearing
1100 > > irregular clipping sound.
1101 > >
1102 > > Is that what you expected?
1103 > >
1104 > > If I decrease the sound to a level where I stop hearing clipping, then I
1105 > > can barely hear the music. Although the same headphones play on my
1106 > > player fine.
1107 > >
1108 > > And It's a shame, that I indeed hear clipping. Are there any ways to
1109 > > increase the sound volume without increasing the mixer setting in ALSA?
1110 >
1111 > There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback
1112 > volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess
1113 > which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my
1114 > old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing
1115 > sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk.
1116 >
1117 > Each one of those will likely have a threshold where you'll risk
1118 > clipping if you go above it. I.e. if PCM and Headphone are at 50, but
1119 > Master is above $master_threshold, you may hear clipping. Likewise, if
1120 > Master and Headphone are at 50, but PCM is above $pcm_threshold, you
1121 > may hear clipping. Similarly, 'Headphone'...
1122 >
1123 > There is probably a combination of settings which works best, and
1124 > sounds fine. The trouble, of course, is finding the maximum safe
1125 > threshold for each.
1126 >
1127 > Me, I'm fortunate; my Intel-HDA-compatible cards all tend to say
1128 > things like "-5dB" or "+20dB" when I'm using the console Alsamixer,
1129 > and I've established that as long as they say "0dB", I get the best
1130 > signal I can get.
1131 >
1132 > > Would a different sound card help?
1133 >
1134 > Sure; you could use a card with more post-mixer amplification. Or a
1135 > card with little to no mixing options. Or an external amplifier.
1136 >
1137 > > Is there any way I can solve the
1138 > > problem without buying new hardware?
1139 >
1140 > You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing
1141 > internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to
1142 > 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been
1143 > positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting
1144 > applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting
1145 > direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But
1146 > "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well
1147 > for the majority of circumstances.
1148 >
1149 > >
1150 > > Thanks a lot for help,
1151 >
1152 > np.
1153 >
1154 > (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got
1155 > sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list
1156 > keeps the archives useful.)
1157 >
1158 > --
1159 > :wq
1160 >
1161 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Ignas Anikevicius
1162 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
1163 > > Dear all,
1164 > >
1165 > > It's been quite a while since I noticed this annoying behaviour, but I
1166 > > could not find any information what might cause this. So the problem is
1167 > > that at lower volumes my HD-Audio with Conexant becomes very noisy and
1168 > > this is regardless of the sound system or speakers/headphones I use.
1169 > >
1170 > > The noise can be described, as high pitched, sandy texture noise
1171 > > heard during more expressive parts of the music or speech.
1172 > >
1173 > > I experience this on two Thinkpads (x200s and x200) and it very evident
1174 > > when I connected external speakers, they produced a lot of this noise,
1175 > > or maybe I just could hear it better, because of the frequency response
1176 > > of the speakers.
1177 > >
1178 > > Does anybody have some similar issues?
1179 > >
1180 > > My current audio setup:
1181 > >
1182 > > * PulseAudio (but the problem is experienced with ALSA as well)
1183 > > * MPD for music playing
1184 > > * Conexant and other related modules compiled in, power-saving
1185 > > features enabled.
1186 > >
1187 > > What I have tried to eliminate the noise:
1188 > >
1189 > > * Various levels of Master,PCM,Headphone channels via Alsamixer
1190 > > * Increase the sample rate in MPD settings.
1191 > >
1192 > > The noise can be clearly head when I Have the following setting on my
1193 > > Alsamixer:
1194 > >
1195 > > * Master ~50
1196 > > * PCM 100
1197 > > * Headphone 100
1198 > >
1199 > > Does anybody has any thoughts on why am I experiencing this?
1200 > >
1201 > > Thanks a lot,
1202 > > Ignas A.
1203 > >
1204 >
1205 > Hi Ignas,
1206 > I've never used pulse-audio so I cannot help with that, but with
1207 > plain Alsa I had a similar (but not identical) problem recently. In my
1208 > case the distorted sound was primarily from my microphone and not, as
1209 > I remember it, from playback. Turned out it was a control I hadn't
1210 > looked at before called 'Digital' which apparently mixes audio in the
1211 > sound chip and for whatever reason was very dirty sounding on the mic
1212 > side.
1213 >
1214 > Note that my audio is not Conextent but rather something called
1215 > SupremeFX X-Fi (Creative Labs maybe?) so your results will almost
1216 > certainly vary. A little machine info is below.
1217 >
1218 > Good luck,
1219 > Mark
1220 >
1221 > c2stable ~ # lspci | grep Audio
1222 > 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD
1223 > Audio Controller
1224 > 02:00.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation GF100 High Definition Audio
1225 > Controller (rev a1)
1226 > 04:00.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation High Definition Audio
1227 > Controller (rev a1)
1228 > c2stable ~ #
1229 >
1230 > c2stable ~ # lsmod
1231 > Module Size Used by
1232 > vmnet 32295 15
1233 > vmblock 9667 0
1234 > vsock 35510 2
1235 > vmci 55922 2 vsock
1236 > vmmon 56524 5
1237 > vboxnetadp 4720 0
1238 > vboxnetflt 13187 0
1239 > vboxdrv 1760740 3 vboxnetadp,vboxnetflt
1240 > nvidia 12297407 104
1241 > snd_hda_codec_hdmi 22531 8
1242 > snd_hda_codec_analog 80332 1
1243 > sky2 42693 0
1244 > i2c_i801 7674 0
1245 > snd_hda_intel 21907 17
1246 > snd_hda_codec 73637 3
1247 > snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel
1248 > snd_hwdep 5508 1 snd_hda_codec
1249 > snd_pcm 74632 7
1250 > snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
1251 > snd_timer 18381 5 snd_pcm
1252 > snd 58592 33
1253 >
1254 > snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
1255 > soundcore 6750 1 snd
1256 > snd_page_alloc 7340 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
1257 > agpgart 31204 1 nvidia
1258 > c2stable ~ #
1259 >
1260 > On 15/05/12 20:08, Michael Mol wrote:
1261 > > There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback
1262 > > volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess
1263 > > which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my
1264 > > old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing
1265 > > sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk.
1266 >
1267 > [...] (some useful stuff snipped :))
1268 >
1269 > At the moment all the other sliders are at 0. So I do not know, maybe
1270 > some other sliders are doing this...
1271 >
1272 > Also, ALSA can show the levels in dBs for my card... but I get sand even
1273 > when I'am at gain of ~ (-11,-14)dB on all three sliders (Master, PCM,
1274 > Headphone).
1275 >
1276 > > You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing
1277 > > internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to
1278 > > 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been
1279 > > positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting
1280 > > applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting
1281 > > direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But
1282 > > "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well
1283 > > for the majority of circumstances.
1284 >
1285 > I am using Pulse :)... The problem with I have that it changes my PCM
1286 > and Headphone levels without asking me... Therefore, if I change the
1287 > levels manually on alsamixer and then use Pavucontrol, it just changes
1288 > the PCM and headphone or speaker levels to max, which makes the sound
1289 > crappy. Otherwise I am quite a happy Pulse user. :)
1290 >
1291 > Is there a way to set the limiting thresholds? Or maybe I am using two
1292 > things at the same (ALSA and Pulse) and they are clashing and,
1293 > therefore, I can not get good quality sound?
1294 >
1295 > >> Thanks a lot for help,
1296 > >
1297 > > np.
1298 > >
1299 > > (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got
1300 > > sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list
1301 > > keeps the archives useful.)
1302 >
1303 > I thought, that I have replied to both, list and you.. :) Well, thanks
1304 > for that. :)
1305 >
1306 > Cheers,
1307 > I.
1308 >
1309 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Ignas Anikevicius
1310 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
1311 > > On 15/05/12 20:08, Michael Mol wrote:
1312 > >> There are going to be multiple sliders which affect your playback
1313 > >> volume. Without seeing a list of your sliders, I couldn't really guess
1314 > >> which, beyond 'Master', 'PCM' and 'Headphone'. There may be others; my
1315 > >> old Sound Blaster Live had a ton of internal signal processing
1316 > >> sliders, and anything that involves amplification presents that risk.
1317 > >
1318 > > [...] (some useful stuff snipped :))
1319 > >
1320 > > At the moment all the other sliders are at 0. So I do not know, maybe
1321 > > some other sliders are doing this...
1322 >
1323 > Not if they're at their minimum settings. :-|
1324 >
1325 > >
1326 > > Also, ALSA can show the levels in dBs for my card... but I get sand even
1327 > > when I'am at gain of ~ (-11,-14)dB on all three sliders (Master, PCM,
1328 > > Headphone).
1329 > >
1330 > >> You might try using something like PulseAudio, which may be doing
1331 > >> internal mixing in the floating point space before it maps back to
1332 > >> 16-bit linear PCM. My experiences with PulseAudio have generally been
1333 > >> positive in terms of audio quality. The trickiest part is getting
1334 > >> applications to pipe their audio through it, followed by getting
1335 > >> direct access to the card's mixer settings if I need it. But
1336 > >> "pavucontrol" as a mixer control for PulseAudio works reasonably well
1337 > >> for the majority of circumstances.
1338 > >
1339 > > I am using Pulse :)... The problem with I have that it changes my PCM
1340 > > and Headphone levels without asking me... Therefore, if I change the
1341 > > levels manually on alsamixer and then use Pavucontrol, it just changes
1342 > > the PCM and headphone or speaker levels to max, which makes the sound
1343 > > crappy. Otherwise I am quite a happy Pulse user. :)
1344 >
1345 > Run alsamixer in a terminal while playing with pavucontrol; you'll see
1346 > Alsamixer update live while Pulse tweaks ALSA's mixer settings. It's
1347 > useful if you want to get a feel for what exactly Pulse is doing.
1348 >
1349 > On my desktop system, I found that if I had the Pulse master volume
1350 > control set to about 70%, Pulse would have my various sliders set to
1351 > just about their maximum setting before I started getting clipping
1352 > noises.
1353 > >
1354 > > Is there a way to set the limiting thresholds?
1355 >
1356 > No; the limiting thresholds I was describing are some value that just
1357 > happens to be what it is because of the way your sound card mixes
1358 > audio together.
1359 >
1360 > > Or maybe I am using two
1361 > > things at the same (ALSA and Pulse) and they are clashing and,
1362 > > therefore, I can not get good quality sound?
1363 >
1364 > Pulse is usually OK at managing ALSA in the background; you just have
1365 > to do all your volume tweaking through pavucontrol if you intend for
1366 > things to not change on you.
1367 >
1368 > [snip]
1369 >
1370 > >> (Note: I CC'd this back to the main list, because somehow this one got
1371 > >> sent to me directly. Channeling communications through the main list
1372 > >> keeps the archives useful.)
1373 > >
1374 > > I thought, that I have replied to both, list and you.. :) Well, thanks
1375 > > for that. :)
1376 >
1377 > Might have been a quirk in my GMail interface, now that I look at it.
1378 > Your earlier email looks fine. Something about the list's distribution
1379 > pattern changed, so simply clicking "Reply" doesn't work; I now have
1380 > to click "Reply All".
1381 >
1382 > Anyway, I'd try taking others' suggestions, too, and possibly poking
1383 > whatever PulseAudio support groups exist. They'll be interested in
1384 > your circumstance. If it's possible to use Pulse reasonably on your
1385 > hardware, they'll want to figure out how to make that less difficult
1386 > to do.
1387 >
1388 > Also, Mark noted that there were sliders he hadn't tweaked before when
1389 > he was experiencing similar issues, and it's plausible Pulse isn't
1390 > poking those at all. Try watching alsamixer to see what Pulse is up
1391 > to, and see if Pulse is passing over some of those sliders.
1392 >
1393 > --
1394 > :wq
1395 >
1396 > On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:26 +0100
1397 > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
1398 >
1399 > > On 15 May 2012 15:45, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
1400 > > > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:50:43 +0100
1401 > > > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
1402 > >
1403 > > >> $ ssh -D localhost:12465 root@10.10.10.12
1404 > > >
1405 > > > This part is fine.
1406 > > >
1407 > > > I tried the next part. It didn't work nicely for me.
1408 > >
1409 > > Ah, thanks for this! It's reassuring to know that it's not just my
1410 > > system. :-)
1411 > >
1412 > >
1413 > > > So what I do now is:
1414 > > >
1415 > > > Firefox + FoxyProxy
1416 > >
1417 > > Firefox is less of a problem for me because I can set it up to
1418 > > socksify everything. It is Kmail that I am mostly interested in.
1419 > >
1420 > >
1421 > > > I see recent KDE now also supports socks. This is a nice new
1422 > > > addition so konqueror can also use it.
1423 > >
1424 > > Yes, but it does not work with the current stable kmail. The new
1425 > > KDEPIM is such a nightmare I do not plan moving to it anytime soon.
1426 > > It screwed up one box that I tried it on and that's enough for me.
1427 > > :-(
1428 > >
1429 > > Did you have any success with proxychains?
1430 > >
1431 > > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD
1432 > > error.
1433 >
1434 > It almost certainly is, tsocks uses LD_PRELOAD to mangle it's magic so
1435 > that stuff works. I believe chromium has severe issues with tsocks
1436 > because of how it does it's sandboxing, but I honestly don't know how
1437 > to get around that.
1438 >
1439 > On a properly setup Gentoo amd64 system, /lib is a link to /lib64, so
1440 > the error you get is not a path error, the chromium binary really
1441 > cannot (or will not) deal with tsocks.so
1442 >
1443 > I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly
1444 > think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug.
1445 >
1446 > Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to
1447 > say?
1448 >
1449 >
1450 >
1451 > >
1452 > >
1453 > > I also noticed that when I try to set up a proxy server in Chromium
1454 > > using the 'under the bonnet' tab, I get this:
1455 > >
1456 > > "When running Chromium under a supported desktop environment, the
1457 > > system proxy settings will be used. However, either your system is not
1458 > > supported or there was a problem while launching your system
1459 > > configuration.
1460 > >
1461 > > But you can still configure via the command line. Please see man
1462 > > chromium-browser for more information on flags and environment
1463 > > variables."
1464 > >
1465 > > Trying the command line did not fix it:
1466 > >
1467 > > [4742:4753:1575546819:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
1468 > > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
1469 > > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
1470 > >
1471 > > That's what made me think that something on my system is not set up
1472 > > properly. :-/
1473 > >
1474 > >
1475 > > These are the libtsocks.so files in my system:
1476 > >
1477 > > # ls -la /lib*/libtsocks.so
1478 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so ->
1479 > > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13
1480 > > 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so -> libtsocks.so.1
1481 > >
1482 > > # ls -la /lib/libtsocks.so*
1483 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so ->
1484 > > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13
1485 > > 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1 -> libtsocks.so.1.8
1486 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib/libtsocks.so.1.8
1487 > >
1488 > > # ls -la /lib64/libtsocks.so*
1489 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so ->
1490 > > libtsocks.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 13
1491 > > 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1 -> libtsocks.so.1.8
1492 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42912 May 13 15:34 /lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8
1493 > >
1494 > > I can't see why it would not load it, unless it should be trying to
1495 > > load the '/lib64/libtsocks.so' instead of the '/lib/libtsocks.so' on
1496 > > an amd64 system? Shall I file a bug?
1497 >
1498 >
1499 >
1500 > --
1501 > Alan McKinnnon
1502 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
1503 >
1504 >
1505 > On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:01:00 -0700
1506 > Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
1507 >
1508 > > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
1509 > > >
1510 > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
1511 > > >
1512 > > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit
1513 > > > tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?
1514 > > >
1515 > > > ROFL
1516 > > >
1517 > > > Dale
1518 > > >
1519 > >
1520 > > Jeez.... Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people?
1521 > > I've honestly worked to get below number 10 and I cannot get there
1522 > > apparently... (Too many posts like this I suppose!) ;-)
1523 >
1524 > This gentoo stuff is addictive :-)
1525 >
1526 > Must be the personalities around here. I reckon that anyone who sticks
1527 > around here and becomes a regular (regardless of their skill level) has
1528 > something special going on inside.
1529 >
1530 > Gentoo-ers all have that DIY attitude, as if they would rather not wait
1531 > around for someone else to do all their lifting for them.
1532 >
1533 >
1534 > --
1535 > Alan McKinnnon
1536 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
1537 >
1538 >
1539 > Hinnerk van Bruinehsen writes:
1540 >
1541 > > On 15.05.2012 11:11, Alex Schuster wrote:
1542 > >> Stroller writes:
1543 > >>
1544 > >>> I boot from a SystemRescueCD and follow the Gentoo quick install guide.
1545 > >>>
1546 > >>> This has never failed me.
1547 > >>
1548 > >> For me it did, half a year ago, several packages failed to build due to
1549 > >> strange libtool errors. It took me some days until I found the solution:
1550 > >> unset path.
1551 > >>
1552 > >> Libtool uses this variable without unsetting it before, and
1553 > SystemRescueCD
1554 > >> defines it as environment variable, which is still available in the
1555 > >> chroot. This messed things up a lot.
1556 > [...]
1557 > > Did you do env-update && . /etc/profile after entering chroot?
1558 > > I always thought that setting the right environment variables was the
1559 > > purpose of that.
1560 >
1561 > Sure. But this only _sets_ some environment variables - it does not
1562 > unset any other variables you already have defined.
1563 >
1564 > The error is in libtool - it uses a variable without unsetting it first.
1565 >
1566 > Wonko
1567 >
1568 > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote:
1569 > > On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:26 +0100
1570 > > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
1571 >
1572 > > > I am not sure if the problem is related to the tsocks LD_PRELOAD
1573 > > > error.
1574 > >
1575 > > It almost certainly is, tsocks uses LD_PRELOAD to mangle it's magic so
1576 > > that stuff works. I believe chromium has severe issues with tsocks
1577 > > because of how it does it's sandboxing, but I honestly don't know how
1578 > > to get around that.
1579 > >
1580 > > On a properly setup Gentoo amd64 system, /lib is a link to /lib64, so
1581 > > the error you get is not a path error, the chromium binary really
1582 > > cannot (or will not) deal with tsocks.so
1583 > >
1584 > > I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly
1585 > > think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug.
1586 > >
1587 > > Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to
1588 > > say?
1589 >
1590 > I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it is
1591 > supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when called
1592 > with tsocks). I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at
1593 > all.
1594 >
1595 > The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely
1596 > ignore
1597 > it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up.
1598 > Is
1599 > there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail?
1600 > --
1601 > Regards,
1602 > Mick
1603 >
1604 > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 18:25:57 john wrote:
1605 >
1606 > > Would like to thank all guys and girls for posting. Even though I
1607 > > post very little myself your posts are always excellent and there is
1608 > > plenty to learn from just reading them.
1609 > >
1610 > > There are things I can do now which I never thought possible. Thanks
1611 >
1612 > Is this one case in which a me-too message is acceptable? Anyway, I
1613 > second John's gratitude to you all.
1614 >
1615 > --
1616 > Rgds
1617 > Peter
1618 >
1619 > On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:50:33 -0400
1620 > Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote:
1621 >
1622 > > I tried Hugin, but got nowhere. I set 6 points on each
1623 > > picture, which are 2 overlapping parts of a single
1624 > > original negative, but all it offered was a black screen;
1625 > > I did follow the on-line help.
1626 > >
1627 > > Then I tried Imagemagick & got a good result after a bit
1628 > > of fussing. The commands I used were
1629 > >
1630 > > convert -size 1000x760 canvas:black brum-canvas.jpg
1631 > > composite -geometry +0+0 brum-3070.jpg brum-canvas.jpg
1632 > > brum-1.jpg composite -geometry +220-8 brum-3068.jpg
1633 > > brum-1.jpg brum-2.jpg
1634 > >
1635 > > You can see the images at
1636 > > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/ : they are of
1637 > > trams in Colmore Row, Birmingham in May 1953 .
1638 > >
1639 > > I still need to light/darken 1 image a bit to hide the
1640 > > join, but as a proof of concept this shows it's feasible
1641 > > with Imagemagick.
1642 > >
1643 > > Any further advice re Hugin is welcome: can anyone do it
1644 > > with these photos ?
1645 > >
1646 >
1647 > I just tried with fotoxx: This is a semi-manual process, but
1648 > I liked the resulting image. The joint is less visible
1649 > than on brum-2.jpg. It was easy to do an "unbend" after
1650 > merging, and therefore the clock and the face on the image
1651 > borders stay in the image. This was my first try to do a
1652 > panorama in fotoxx, and it took me less than 5 minutes,
1653 > much faster than with hugin. If you like I send you the
1654 > image to your private mail.
1655 >
1656 > Urs
1657 >
1658 > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote:
1659 > > I just tried with fotoxx.
1660 >
1661 > I hadn't heard of that one : there are so many pkgs in media/gfx
1662 > that it's difficult to be sure I've checked all photo editors.
1663 >
1664 > > This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the resulting image.
1665 >
1666 > It c~b any more manual than Imagemagick (smile).
1667 >
1668 > > The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg.
1669 >
1670 > That wb useful : no doubt, I could adjust one of them with Imagemagick,
1671 > but eventually there wb >= 100 similar merges to do,
1672 > so some degree of automation wb very helpful.
1673 >
1674 > > It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging
1675 > > and therefore the clock and the face on the image borders stay in the
1676 > image.
1677 >
1678 > Not a problem with Imagemagick.
1679 >
1680 > > This was my first try to do a panorama in fotoxx
1681 > > and it took me less than 5 minutes, much faster than with hugin.
1682 > > If you like I send you the image to your private mail.
1683 >
1684 > Please do & thanks for this info.
1685 >
1686 > Does anyone else have suggestions re pkgs or methods ?
1687 > -- it does look as if this rather simple task is fairly challenging,
1688 > so others may benefit if it's on record here.
1689 >
1690 > I have emerged Gimp & will look at what it can do soon :
1691 > it has 'layers', which look like what is needed.
1692 >
1693 > --
1694 > ========================,,============================================
1695 > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
1696 > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
1697 > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
1698 >
1699 >
1700 >
1701 > On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
1702 > >
1703 > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
1704 > >
1705 > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
1706 > >
1707 > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
1708 > > Someone put alum in your water or something?
1709 > >
1710 >
1711 > I blabbed that much??
1712 >
1713 > Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads related to CUPS,
1714 > KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and still end up in the top 5??
1715 > o_O
1716 >
1717 > Rgds,
1718 >
1719 > Hi,
1720 >
1721 > I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm
1722 > following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start
1723 > which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go.
1724 >
1725 > However... two different questions:
1726 >
1727 > When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon
1728 > rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux
1729 > /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run
1730 > grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux
1731 > image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather
1732 > grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or
1733 > what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within
1734 > a chroot?
1735 >
1736 > Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo
1737 > system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of
1738 > /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs. I
1739 > must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will work. Is
1740 > there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For now I have
1741 > simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but I'm curious to
1742 > know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own somehow.
1743 >
1744 > Thanks,
1745 > Paul
1746 >
1747 > On 15 May 2012 19:37, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
1748 > > Hi,
1749 > >
1750 > > I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm
1751 > > following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start
1752 > > which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go.
1753 > >
1754 > > However... two different questions:
1755 > >
1756 > > When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon
1757 > > rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux
1758 > > /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run
1759 > > grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux
1760 > > image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather
1761 > > grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or
1762 > > what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within
1763 > > a chroot?
1764 >
1765 > I don't really understand where the chroot comes into this but ... did
1766 > you add the "-o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" part? I forgot that bit a few
1767 > times and then couldn't figure out why my changes weren't taking
1768 > effect. :-)
1769 >
1770 > > Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo
1771 > > system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of
1772 > > /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs. I
1773 > > must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will work. Is
1774 > > there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For now I have
1775 > > simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but I'm curious to
1776 > > know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own somehow.
1777 > >
1778 > > Thanks,
1779 > > Paul
1780 > >
1781 >
1782 > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
1783 > <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com> wrote:
1784 > > On 15 May 2012 19:37, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
1785 > wrote:
1786 > >> Hi,
1787 > >>
1788 > >> I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm
1789 > >> following the guide at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start
1790 > >> which seems easy enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go.
1791 > >>
1792 > >> However... two different questions:
1793 > >>
1794 > >> When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon
1795 > >> rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux
1796 > >> /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I run
1797 > >> grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found linux
1798 > >> image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but rather
1799 > >> grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where /boot is or
1800 > >> what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2 config from within
1801 > >> a chroot?
1802 > >
1803 > > I don't really understand where the chroot comes into this but ... did
1804 > > you add the "-o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" part? I forgot that bit a few
1805 > > times and then couldn't figure out why my changes weren't taking
1806 > > effect. :-)
1807 >
1808 > Hehe, yeah, I used that command. I'm installing it from chroot for the
1809 > first time because gentoo's bootloader was not yet present on the
1810 > machine (only Windows7).
1811 >
1812 > 120515 Philip Webb wrote:
1813 > > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote:
1814 > >> I just tried with fotoxx.
1815 > >> This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the resulting image.
1816 >
1817 > I've installed Fotoxx & it does a very good job !
1818 >
1819 > >> The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg.
1820 >
1821 > There's no sign of it on my version :
1822 > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/brum-3.jpg
1823 >
1824 > >> It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging
1825 > >> and therefore the clock and the face on the image borders stay in the
1826 > image.
1827 >
1828 > They're on my image, but I can't find out how to turn it into a rectangle.
1829 > NB there are noticeable curves at the R-hand edge not in the original:
1830 > look at the sidewalk curve & at the building pediment.
1831 > Any suggestions ? -- otherwise, this looks like the tool to use.
1832 >
1833 > --
1834 > ========================,,============================================
1835 > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
1836 > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
1837 > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
1838 >
1839 >
1840 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1841 > Hash: SHA1
1842 >
1843 > On 16.05.2012 04:37, Paul Hartman wrote:
1844 > > Hi,
1845 > >
1846 > > I'm trying out grub2 for the first time on my old laptop. I'm
1847 > > following the guide at:
1848 > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start which seems easy
1849 > > enough. Basically just emerge it, install and go.
1850 > >
1851 > > However... two different questions:
1852 > >
1853 > > When I did this from a chroot, I just got the GRUB> prompt upon
1854 > > rebooting... no menu or anything. I can manually type "linux
1855 > > /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3" and then boot into my system. When I
1856 > > run grub2-mkconfig from within the chroot, I don't get any "Found
1857 > > linux image" lines. It does not create /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but
1858 > > rather grub.cfg.new. So I don't know if it's confused about where
1859 > > /boot is or what. Is there a trick to installing/updating grub2
1860 > > config from within a chroot?
1861 > >
1862 > > Second, when running grub2-mkconfig from within my working gentoo
1863 > > system, it fails with "error: failed to get canonical path of
1864 > > /dev/root." which is apparently because I don't use an initramfs.
1865 > > I must manually run "ln -s /dev/sda3 /dev/boot" before it will
1866 > > work. Is there any trick to avoid having to do that every time? For
1867 > > now I have simply added that to my after-kernel-update script but
1868 > > I'm curious to know if grub2 knows how to handle this on its own
1869 > > somehow.
1870 > >
1871 > > Thanks, Paul
1872 > >
1873 >
1874 > If I recall correctly you need to mount /sys for grub2 to sucessfully
1875 > detect devices.
1876 > mount -o bind /sys <path-to-gentoo/sys should suffice.
1877 > proc and dev should be mounted according to the manual.
1878 >
1879 > If you use a /boot- partition mount it, when you are inside the chroot.
1880 > Doing so it worked like a charm for all devices I installed that way
1881 > (3 in the last 3 months, if I recall correctly).
1882 >
1883 > With kind regards,
1884 >
1885 > Hinnerk
1886 >
1887 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1888 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
1889 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
1890 >
1891 > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPs2UIAAoJEJwwOFaNFkYcgrcIALVB1QY/HOX/xkDesJkRSLjS
1892 > rvK4m/WDde6FsmT2B3XSSZ9W6aVAfdJO8+GM+0MolpRT64fp7wNtAr0yaV4ALRr8
1893 > tNxk0YqWXPcSmh4LIsagKKnMuCCajHXZMK7AWPqnyAtifKPlP14j4H2T9cNegPvz
1894 > doR9DF2sU/TPyCzVrvq1ouMelXkao9EC7ejQ39nnZ12PrxrdqapITpkqjJ2OuTOn
1895 > NylZS6HQnZw+A8uLVuUD+Mclu/Z+sRbSEUAQelHSDe3knA7MZTkeXBrUoKj4g63r
1896 > 2YRnrJACxeeJkIVxGOuVTQIT7a0A5TZHzMiv8wWTbIfDstPUBkGd3iV6Jvl3ndM=
1897 > =tTo+
1898 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1899 >
1900 > Hello everybody,
1901 >
1902 > I was wondering if the following is possible:
1903 > - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default
1904 > - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time)
1905 >
1906 > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
1907 > services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
1908 > Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
1909 >
1910 > Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just
1911 > give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them
1912 > could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with
1913 > openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know,
1914 > whether I need anything else.
1915 >
1916 > Thanks for help,
1917 > Ignas A.
1918 >
1919 > On 15 May 2012 23:19, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
1920 > > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 22:08:17 you wrote:
1921 >
1922 > >> I don't see anything wrong with the rest of your config. I honestly
1923 > >> think you are dealing with a chromium feature not a chromium bug.
1924 > >>
1925 > >> Have you searched chromium-specific sites to see what others have to
1926 > >> say?
1927 > >
1928 > > I haven't yet, because it is not just Chromium that's not working as it
1929 > is
1930 > > supposed to (although it is the most vocal app on the terminal when
1931 > called
1932 > > with tsocks). I haven't yet found an app which will work with tsocks at
1933 > all.
1934 >
1935 > OK, I just noticed that launching chromium from a terminal brings up
1936 > this error, so it is not tsocks specific:
1937 >
1938 > $ chromium
1939 > [4163:4174:213397467:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(239)] Failed to call
1940 > method: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
1941 > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files
1942 >
1943 >
1944 > > The fact that proxychains does not work at all (applications completely
1945 > ignore
1946 > > it and run outside the tunnel) made me question the sanity of my set up.
1947 > Is
1948 > > there anything other than coincidence that would cause both apps to fail?
1949 >
1950 > Yep, it is a coincidence it seems:
1951 >
1952 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408427
1953 >
1954 > --
1955 > Regards,
1956 > Mick
1957 >
1958 > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius
1959 > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
1960 > > Hello everybody,
1961 > >
1962 > > I was wondering if the following is possible:
1963 > > - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default
1964 > > - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time)
1965 > >
1966 > > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
1967 > > services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
1968 > > Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
1969 > >
1970 > > Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just
1971 > > give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them
1972 > > could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with
1973 > > openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know,
1974 > > whether I need anything else.
1975 >
1976 > Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported,
1977 > and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine
1978 > I have access to that still uses OpenRC.
1979 >
1980 > You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box)
1981 > exactly what you want to.
1982 >
1983 > Regards.
1984 > --
1985 > Canek Peláez Valdés
1986 > Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
1987 > Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
1988 >
1989 > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
1990 > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius
1991 > > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
1992 > >> Hello everybody,
1993 > >>
1994 > >> I was wondering if the following is possible:
1995 > >> - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default
1996 > >> - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time)
1997 > >>
1998 > >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
1999 > >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
2000 > >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
2001 > >>
2002 > >> Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just
2003 > >> give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them
2004 > >> could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with
2005 > >> openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know,
2006 > >> whether I need anything else.
2007 > >
2008 > > Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported,
2009 > > and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine
2010 > > I have access to that still uses OpenRC.
2011 > >
2012 > > You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box)
2013 > > exactly what you want to.
2014 > >
2015 > > Regards.
2016 >
2017 >
2018 > Just to add for the OP, this was discussed on -dev and it was removed,
2019 > although you can still try it if you want, a good while back because it
2020 > was causing problems. I don't know anything much about systemsd but
2021 > according to the devs, you shouldn't use the parallel option with openRC
2022 > unless you want to keep up with the problems.
2023 >
2024 > Dale
2025 >
2026 > :-) :-)
2027 >
2028 > --
2029 > I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
2030 > how you interpreted my words!
2031 >
2032 > Miss the compile output? Hint:
2033 > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
2034 >
2035 > On 05/16/2012 01:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius wrote:
2036 >
2037 > > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
2038 > > services are being started
2039 >
2040 > I can barely remember when I was young enough to care about saving
2041 > a few seconds. (But, good for you :)
2042 >
2043 > Have you heard of systemd? Yet another evil conspiracy spawned by
2044 > Lennart Poettering, father of pulseaudio and scourge of old fossils
2045 > (like many of us here) who avoid any form of progress.
2046 >
2047 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd
2048 >
2049 > My evil twin, Walter Dnes, has been agitating for systemd in this
2050 > mailing list for months. He actually knows how systemd works and
2051 > can be persuaded to... well, I expect he'll be along shortly to
2052 > tell you about it.
2053 >
2054 >
2055 > Hello,
2056 >
2057 > I do need the ruby-gem linecache19-0.5.12. Usually, there are two ways to
2058 > install a gem, right? Via emerge and via gem install. But here, only one
2059 > way works. dev-ruby/linecache only builds the
2060 > ruby18-version
2061 > of
2062 > this gem, so I'm stuck with gem install. But gem install fails with the
2063 > following error:
2064 >
2065 > trace_nums.c:(.text+0x22): undefined reference to `ruby_current_thread'
2066 >
2067 >
2068 > I am using ruby-1.9.3p194, but tried with different versions as well.
2069 >
2070 > Does anyone have a clue what I can do to solve the problem and get
2071 > linecache19-0.5.12 installed?
2072 >
2073 > Thanks in advance,
2074 >
2075 > Christian.
2076 >
2077 > On Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:26 +0100, Ignas Anikevicius wrote:
2078 >
2079 > > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
2080 > > services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
2081 > > Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
2082 >
2083 > Yes it is. The initscripts themselves have such a mechanism, using the
2084 > before and after statements, for example making sure that network
2085 > services are started after the network is brought up. You can add your
2086 > own rules to the daemons' config files in /etc/conf.d or to /etc/rc.conf.
2087 >
2088 > To have bitlbee start after xdm either add
2089 >
2090 > rc_after="xdm"
2091 >
2092 > to /etc/conf.d/bitlbee or put
2093 >
2094 > rc_bitlbee_after="xdm"
2095 >
2096 > in /etc/rc.conf. Both have the same effect, it depends on whether you
2097 > want to put all these settings together or in the individual services'
2098 > config files.
2099 >
2100 >
2101 > --
2102 > Neil Bothwick
2103 >
2104 > Tact is for people who don't understand sarcasm.
2105 >
2106 > On 16/05/12 14:15, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2107 > > On Wed, 16 May 2012 09:40:26 +0100, Ignas Anikevicius wrote:
2108 > >
2109 > >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
2110 > >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
2111 > >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
2112 > >
2113 > > Yes it is. The initscripts themselves have such a mechanism, using the
2114 > > before and after statements, for example making sure that network
2115 > > services are started after the network is brought up. You can add your
2116 > > own rules to the daemons' config files in /etc/conf.d or to /etc/rc.conf.
2117 > >
2118 > > To have bitlbee start after xdm either add
2119 > >
2120 > > rc_after="xdm"
2121 > >
2122 > > to /etc/conf.d/bitlbee or put
2123 > >
2124 > > rc_bitlbee_after="xdm"
2125 > >
2126 > > in /etc/rc.conf. Both have the same effect, it depends on whether you
2127 > > want to put all these settings together or in the individual services'
2128 > > config files.
2129 > >
2130 >
2131 > Thanks for the tip!, I will use this to see how much difference do I
2132 > get. :)
2133 >
2134 > Cheers,
2135 > Ignas
2136 >
2137 > On 16/05/12 13:13, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
2138 > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius
2139 > > <anikevicius@×××××.com> wrote:
2140 > >> Hello everybody,
2141 > >>
2142 > >> I was wondering if the following is possible:
2143 > >> - Add a lot of daemons to a newly created runlevel post-default
2144 > >> - Switch to it after the xdm is started (or after some time)
2145 > >>
2146 > >> I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial
2147 > >> services are being started (e.g. fcron, bitlbee, ntpd to name a few).
2148 > >> Maybe it is possible to somehow prioritize the initscripts?
2149 > >>
2150 > >> Another related question is that I come from Arch and there I could just
2151 > >> give the *order* of the daemons/initscripts to start and some of them
2152 > >> could be started and 'in background'. Is it possible to do that with
2153 > >> openrc? I saw the rc_parallel option in rc.conf, but I do not know,
2154 > >> whether I need anything else.
2155 > >
2156 > > Be aware that the rc_parallel option has never been really supported,
2157 > > and it actually doesn't appear in the /etc/rc.conf of the one machine
2158 > > I have access to that still uses OpenRC.
2159 > >
2160 > > You may want to try systemd, it sounds like it does (out of the box)
2161 > > exactly what you want to.
2162 > >
2163 > > Regards.
2164 >
2165 > I did know, that this was removed. If I experience problems I'll remove
2166 > the option, but maybe I'll remove it all together.
2167 >
2168 > I have systemd installed as I wanted to try, but I do not like the way
2169 > everything is managed. I like the idea of simple bash initscripts, which
2170 > can be easily extended if needed. I can also write bash scripts, which
2171 > configure my system the way I want (i.e. set battery charging thresholds
2172 > or something similar).
2173 >
2174 > I do not care for a split second advantage, but I just do not see a lot
2175 > of point in waiting for bitlbee to start before xdm so that I might need
2176 > maybe a while after I boot into my computer.
2177 >
2178 > Thanks for suggestions to everybody.
2179 >
2180 > Cheers,
2181 > Ignas
2182 >
2183 >
2184 > Hello,
2185 >
2186 > I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
2187 > emerge I get the following
2188 >
2189 > [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking
2190 > media-video/libav-0.8.2)
2191 >
2192 > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
2193 > * installed at the same time on the same system.
2194 >
2195 > (media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
2196 > pulled in by media-video/ffmpeg required by @selected
2197 >
2198 > (media-video/libav-0.8.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
2199 > in by
2200 >
2201 > >=media-video/libav-0.8.1[X,encode,-jpeg2k,-mp3,-sdl,-theora,-threads,-truetype,-vaapi,-vdpau,-x264]
2202 > required by (virtual/ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
2203 > merge)
2204 >
2205 >
2206 > This happens for several use flags (mp3 aac)
2207 >
2208 >
2209 > Does this mean that ffmpeg no longer supports mp3 x264 theora etc?
2210 >
2211 > And if I need to codecise an mp3 I cannot use ffmpeg?
2212 >
2213 > Or have I lost the plot?
2214 > --
2215 > John D Maunder
2216 >
2217 > On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:29:11 +0000
2218 > john <jdm@××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2219 >
2220 > >
2221 > > Hello,
2222 > >
2223 > > I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
2224 > > emerge I get the following
2225 > >
2226 > > [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking
2227 > > media-video/libav-0.8.2)
2228 > >
2229 > > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
2230 > > * installed at the same time on the same system.
2231 > >
2232 > > (media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
2233 > > pulled in by media-video/ffmpeg required by @selected
2234 > >
2235 > > (media-video/libav-0.8.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
2236 > > in by
2237 > >
2238 > >=media-video/libav-0.8.1[X,encode,-jpeg2k,-mp3,-sdl,-theora,-threads,-truetype,-vaapi,-vdpau,-x264]
2239 > > required by (virtual/ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
2240 > > merge)
2241 > >
2242 > >
2243 > > This happens for several use flags (mp3 aac)
2244 > >
2245 > >
2246 > > Does this mean that ffmpeg no longer supports mp3 x264 theora etc?
2247 >
2248 > No, it means that ffmpeg and libav provide the same functionalityand
2249 > thus cannot both be installed on the same machine at the same time,
2250 > you need to pick one (libav is actually a fork of ffmpeg). See here:
2251 >
2252 >
2253 > http://blogs.gentoo.org/scarabeus/2012/05/14/media-videolibav-stable-on-most-important-archs/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed
2254 >
2255 >
2256 > >
2257 > > And if I need to codecise an mp3 I cannot use ffmpeg?
2258 > >
2259 > > Or have I lost the plot?
2260 >
2261 >
2262 >
2263 > --
2264 > Alan McKinnnon
2265 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
2266 >
2267 >
2268 > Hi, Gentoo!
2269 >
2270 > Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of
2271 > <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is
2272 > regardless of which application is currently active. This is
2273 > particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the
2274 > screen.
2275 >
2276 > I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event
2277 > library (I can't remember exactly what this was).
2278 >
2279 > I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it
2280 > stop?
2281 >
2282 > --
2283 > Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
2284 >
2285 > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote:
2286 > > Hi, Gentoo!
2287 > >
2288 > > Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of
2289 > > <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is
2290 > > regardless of which application is currently active. This is
2291 > > particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the
2292 > > screen.
2293 > >
2294 > > I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event
2295 > > library (I can't remember exactly what this was).
2296 > >
2297 > > I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it
2298 > > stop?
2299 >
2300 > I would downgrade to previous version of the evdev driver and see if
2301 > it helps. Or disable/change the shortcut for print screen as a
2302 > temporary workaround.
2303 >
2304 > On 05/16/2012 03:00 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
2305 > > Hi, Gentoo!
2306 > >
2307 > > Just this past hour, I've noticed that in Gnome 2, any depression of
2308 > > <up> wants to create a .png image of my current desktop. This is
2309 > > regardless of which application is currently active. This is
2310 > > particularly irritating in Firefox, where I want <up> to scroll the
2311 > > screen.
2312 > >
2313 > > I suspect this might have been caused by a recent update to the ?event
2314 > > library (I can't remember exactly what this was).
2315 > >
2316 > > I hate it when people do "clever" things like this. How can I make it
2317 > > stop?
2318 >
2319 > You did me a huge favor by asking that question, thanks! While poking
2320 > around in the keyboard settings applet I discovered a well-hidden option
2321 > to disable the Caps-Lock key. I hit that stupid thing by accident at
2322 > least ten times/hour and say very vulgar things when it happens ;)
2323 >
2324 > The keyboard-shortcuts applet does have an option to change the screenshot
2325 > hotkey, so maybe something changed it behind your back?
2326 >
2327 >
2328 >
2329 >
2330 > On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:12:25 -0400
2331 > Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote:
2332 >
2333 > > 120515 Philip Webb wrote:
2334 > > > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote:
2335 > > >> I just tried with fotoxx.
2336 > > >> This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the
2337 > > >> resulting image.
2338 > >
2339 > > I've installed Fotoxx & it does a very good job !
2340 > >
2341 > > >> The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg.
2342 > >
2343 > > There's no sign of it on my version :
2344 > > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/brum-3.jpg
2345 > >
2346 > > >> It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging
2347 > > >> and therefore the clock and the face on the image
2348 > > >> borders stay in the image.
2349 > >
2350 > > They're on my image, but I can't find out how to turn it
2351 > > into a rectangle. NB there are noticeable curves at the
2352 > > R-hand edge not in the original: look at the sidewalk
2353 > > curve & at the building pediment. Any suggestions ? --
2354 > > otherwise, this looks like the tool to use.
2355 > >
2356 >
2357 > Transform -> Unbend Image
2358 > Play with the vertical values, this is very easy, fast and
2359 > intuitive. With brum-3.jpg the best combination was:
2360 > vertical linear 5, vertical curved -16, Done
2361 > and after that
2362 > Transform -> Trim Image or even easier
2363 > Transform -> Auto-Trim Image to get rid of the black areas.
2364 >
2365 > In the case of brum-3.jpg apply a little bit of
2366 > Retouch -> Gamma Curves, (bend the left part of the curve
2367 > a little bit to the bottom, and the right part to the top)
2368 > to enhance the image contrast.
2369 > Normally the image looses a little bit of sharpness during
2370 > the panorama stitching. You can correct this with:
2371 > Retouch -> Sharpen Image.
2372 >
2373 > But: If you would like to make an exhibit, then you get
2374 > better image quality if you bring the negatives to an old
2375 > fashioned photographer for direct enlargement on B&W photo
2376 > paper.
2377 >
2378 > Urs
2379 >
2380 > On 05/16/2012 07:08 PM, walt wrote:
2381 >
2382 >> You did me a huge favor by asking that question, thanks! While poking
2383 >> around in the keyboard settings applet I discovered a well-hidden option to
2384 >> disable the Caps-Lock key. I hit that stupid thing by accident at least ten
2385 >> times/hour and say very vulgar things when it happens ;) The
2386 >> keyboard-shortcuts applet does have an option to change the screenshot
2387 >> hotkey, so maybe something changed it behind your back?
2388 >>
2389 > Could you amplify a little bit and reveal exactly what applet you used and
2390 > where the little option is located?
2391 >
2392 > Thanks,
2393 > --
2394 > G.Wolfe Woodbury
2395 > aka redwolfe
2396 >
2397 >
2398 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] UN-subscribe -- Digest of gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>