| 1 |
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:24 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> 081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here |
| 5 |
> >> ? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It's this [details snipped: thanks]: |
| 8 |
> > So basically it is dependant on the nsplugin USE flag |
| 9 |
> > and will look for xulrunner or seamonkey to build against. |
| 10 |
> > If neither are found, you have an error condition. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Thanks: Xulrunner is a big pkg in itself, but it seems unavoidable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
For probably the first time ever, I just had a look at that. And I'm asking |
| 15 |
myself - why does OOo have nsplugins support at all? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It's an office suite - I use it mostly to read documents other people send me, |
| 18 |
and because antiword is a little too minimal. What could OOo possibly do in |
| 19 |
my specific case that requires browser plugins? It's not like I'm in the |
| 20 |
habit of embedding java and flash applets into impress presentations |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives