1 |
Raffaele Belardi wrote: |
2 |
> One (~x86) LXDE system completed the switch with no problem, the other (~amd64) built all |
3 |
> except two packaged (sdlmame and torcs) which did not build with gcc-7.2 even before the |
4 |
> switch to 17.0. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Gentoo devs and arch testers did a good job as usual. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'll do the switch on the Gnome system in the next days but up to now I can say that the |
9 |
> switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major compiler version. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> raffaele |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
I'm having trouble with these: |
17 |
|
18 |
net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 |
19 |
dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3 |
20 |
net-libs/webkit-gtk |
21 |
|
22 |
Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be |
23 |
profile switch related. If I had to guess, it just happened to pop up |
24 |
and isn't related to the switch. They are back in the rear compiling as |
25 |
I type. |
26 |
|
27 |
I still have a issue with openshot and I think my nvidia drivers to deal |
28 |
with too. It has some sort of issue but I haven't looked into what the |
29 |
cause is for it yet. However, that will be fixed before my next full |
30 |
rebuild. Once I get all these little issues dealt with, I plan to do a |
31 |
emerge -e world again just to be sure. It's cool here so the heat will |
32 |
be good. ;-) |
33 |
|
34 |
Over all tho, it went fairly well here too. The issues I have ran into |
35 |
are most likely not related to the switch. Generally speaking, some of |
36 |
the switches in the past have been pretty major changes. This one seems |
37 |
to fall into that category to me at least. As you said, not to painful |
38 |
really. Just a little time consuming at times. |
39 |
|
40 |
Dale |
41 |
|
42 |
:-) :-) |