Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:04:31
Message-Id: 201105271002.18707.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ? by Paul Hartman
1 Apparently, though unproven, at 07:07 on Friday 27 May 2011, Paul Hartman did
2 opine thusly:
3
4 > This is a new one to me. I've only been using kernel 2.6.39 (vanilla)
5 > for a bit over a day. A few hours ago, this happened while I was away
6 > from my computer:
7 >
8 > [150561.346968] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
9 > [150562.060113] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
10 > [150562.776438] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
11 > [150563.491950] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
12 > [150564.205886] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
13 > [150564.922472] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
14 > [150565.635036] ip_rt_bug: 0.0.0.0 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
15 >
16 > (this message repeated at this rate for 35 seconds in total)
17 >
18 > Weird... I don't know what it could be. Do you?
19
20 Dunno either. But I'm having weird issues with 2.6.39 too - LibreOffice
21 segfaults and kills my kdm session!
22
23 Perhaps 2.6.39 is not as stable as we would like it to be ?
24
25
26 --
27 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com