1 |
On 01/29/2019 01:08 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> Obviously. Hence the reason I said that it shouldn't matter if the |
3 |
> module is built in-kernel. |
4 |
|
5 |
I'm saying it does matter. |
6 |
|
7 |
> I'm not sure why it seems like we're talking past each other here... |
8 |
|
9 |
You seem to be focusing on the second kernel that the initramfs execs. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'm talking about the first kernel that the initramfs uses. |
12 |
|
13 |
The initramfs won't be able to do crap if it doesn't have the device and |
14 |
file system drives necessary for the initramfs kernel & init scripts to |
15 |
boot. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Now, it might not support a kernel that doesn't support module loading |
18 |
> at all, though I'm not sure why not. If it doesn't I could see why the |
19 |
> developers wouldn't be bothered to address the use case. |
20 |
|
21 |
Yet another possible reason to dislike dracut. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Grant. . . . |
27 |
unix || die |