1 |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM, <Meino.Cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> yes the option was set for what reason ever...I will clear that. |
4 |
> Next question...: Do I need v86d still then? |
5 |
|
6 |
Probably not, but I have no idea why you even had it in the first place. |
7 |
|
8 |
> |
9 |
> Another thing which drives me crazy: |
10 |
> Linux-headers! |
11 |
> emerge insists of installing linux-headers-4.10. I am runnig |
12 |
> 4.9.12. Unstable is globally set (~amd64). |
13 |
|
14 |
In general I don't think matching the exact kernel version is |
15 |
important, though perhaps v86d cares if you need that. |
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> But giviing |
19 |
> |
20 |
> emerge sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9 |
21 |
> or |
22 |
> emerge 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9' |
23 |
> |
24 |
> gives me |
25 |
> |
26 |
> !!! 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9' is not a valid package atom. |
27 |
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Even |
30 |
> |
31 |
> emerge sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10 |
32 |
> or |
33 |
> emerge 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10' |
34 |
> |
35 |
> results in |
36 |
> |
37 |
> !!! 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10' is not a valid package atom. |
38 |
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details. |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
The syntax would be emerge '=sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9' |
42 |
|
43 |
The = is critical, since that makes it an atom. Depending on your |
44 |
shell you might or might not need quotes. |
45 |
|
46 |
Again, I'm not sure you really need to worry about it. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Rich |